Literature DB >> 20868899

Dedicated breast computed tomography: the optimal cross-sectional imaging solution?

Karen K Lindfors1, John M Boone, Mary S Newell, Carl J D'Orsi.   

Abstract

Dedicated breast computed tomography (DBCT) is a burgeoning technology that has many advantages over current breast-imaging systems. Three-dimensional visualization of the breast mitigates the limiting effects of superimposition noted with mammography. Postprocessing capabilities will allow application of advanced technologies, such as creation of maximum-intensity projection and subtraction images, and the use of both computer-aided detection and possible computer-aided diagnosis algorithms. Excellent morphologic detail and soft tissue contrast can be achieved, due in part to the isotropic image data that DBCT produces. The expected cost should be more reasonable than magnetic resonance imaging. At present, because the breast is not compressed, patients find it more comfortable than mammography. Physiologic information can be obtained when intravenous contrast material is used and/or when DBCT is combined with single photon emission-computed tomography or positron emission tomography. DBCT provides an excellent platform for multimodality systems including integration with interventional and therapeutic procedures. With a slightly altered design, the DBCT platform may also be useful for external-beam radiation with image guidance.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20868899      PMCID: PMC2972197          DOI: 10.1016/j.rcl.2010.06.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am        ISSN: 0033-8389            Impact factor:   2.303


  24 in total

1.  Why should breast tumour detection go three dimensional?

Authors:  Zikuan Chen; Ruola Ning
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2003-07-21       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  A comprehensive analysis of DgN(CT) coefficients for pendant-geometry cone-beam breast computed tomography.

Authors:  J M Boone; N Shah; T R Nelson
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Contrast-enhanced dedicated breast CT: initial clinical experience.

Authors:  Nicolas D Prionas; Karen K Lindfors; Shonket Ray; Shih-Ying Huang; Laurel A Beckett; Wayne L Monsky; John M Boone
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 4.  Functional imaging in CT.

Authors:  Peter Dawson
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2006-09-18       Impact factor: 3.528

5.  Analysis of a novel offset cone-beam computed mammotomography system geometry for accomodating various breast sizes.

Authors:  Randolph L McKinley; Martin P Tornai; Caryl Brzymialkiewicz; Priti Madhav; Ehsan Samei; James E Bowsher
Journal:  Phys Med       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.685

Review 6.  Tumour angiogenesis and its relation to contrast enhancement on computed tomography: a review.

Authors:  K A Miles
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 3.528

7.  Evaluation of a prospective scoring system designed for a multicenter breast MR imaging screening study.

Authors:  Ruth M L Warren; Deborah Thompson; Linda J Pointon; Rebecca Hoff; Fiona J Gilbert; Anwar R Padhani; Douglas F Easton; Sunil R Lakhani; Martin O Leach
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Diagnostic accuracy of mammography, clinical examination, US, and MR imaging in preoperative assessment of breast cancer.

Authors:  Wendie A Berg; Lorena Gutierrez; Moriel S NessAiver; W Bradford Carter; Mythreyi Bhargavan; Rebecca S Lewis; Olga B Ioffe
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2004-10-14       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Combined screening with ultrasound and mammography vs mammography alone in women at elevated risk of breast cancer.

Authors:  Wendie A Berg; Jeffrey D Blume; Jean B Cormack; Ellen B Mendelson; Daniel Lehrer; Marcela Böhm-Vélez; Etta D Pisano; Roberta A Jong; W Phil Evans; Marilyn J Morton; Mary C Mahoney; Linda Hovanessian Larsen; Richard G Barr; Dione M Farria; Helga S Marques; Karan Boparai
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2008-05-14       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 10.  Breast CT.

Authors:  Stephen J Glick
Journal:  Annu Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 9.590

View more
  22 in total

1.  Automated detection of mass lesions in dedicated breast CT: a preliminary study.

Authors:  I Reiser; R M Nishikawa; M L Giger; J M Boone; K K Lindfors; K Yang
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Local curvature analysis for classifying breast tumors: Preliminary analysis in dedicated breast CT.

Authors:  Juhun Lee; Robert M Nishikawa; Ingrid Reiser; John M Boone; Karen K Lindfors
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Impact of lesion segmentation metrics on computer-aided diagnosis/detection in breast computed tomography.

Authors:  Hsien-Chi Kuo; Maryellen L Giger; Ingrid Reiser; Karen Drukker; John M Boone; Karen K Lindfors; Kai Yang; Alexandra Edwards
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2014-12-24

4.  Level set segmentation of breast masses in contrast-enhanced dedicated breast CT and evaluation of stopping criteria.

Authors:  Hsien-Chi Kuo; Maryellen L Giger; Ingrid Reiser; John M Boone; Karen K Lindfors; Kai Yang; Alexandra Edwards
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 4.056

5.  Radiation doses in volume-of-interest breast computed tomography--A Monte Carlo simulation study.

Authors:  Chao-Jen Lai; Yuncheng Zhong; Ying Yi; Tianpeng Wang; Chris C Shaw
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Lack of agreement between radiologists: implications for image-based model observers.

Authors:  Juhun Lee; Robert M Nishikawa; Ingrid Reiser; Margarita L Zuley; John M Boone
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2017-05-03

7.  Generation of a suite of 3D computer-generated breast phantoms from a limited set of human subject data.

Authors:  Christina M L Hsu; Mark L Palmeri; W Paul Segars; Alexander I Veress; James T Dobbins
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Quantitative analysis for breast density estimation in low dose chest CT scans.

Authors:  Woo Kyung Moon; Chung-Ming Lo; Jin Mo Goo; Min Sun Bae; Jung Min Chang; Chiun-Sheng Huang; Jeon-Hor Chen; Violeta Ivanova; Ruey-Feng Chang
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2014-03-19       Impact factor: 4.460

9.  Neutrosophic segmentation of breast lesions for dedicated breast computed tomography.

Authors:  Juhun Lee; Robert M Nishikawa; Ingrid Reiser; John M Boone
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2018-03-06

Review 10.  Ultrasound Imaging Technologies for Breast Cancer Detection and Management: A Review.

Authors:  Rongrong Guo; Guolan Lu; Binjie Qin; Baowei Fei
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2017-10-26       Impact factor: 2.998

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.