Literature DB >> 20868835

Use of ventricular assist devices in children across the United States: analysis of 7.5 million pediatric hospitalizations.

David L S Morales1, Farhan Zafar, Joseph W Rossano, Jorge D Salazar, John L Jefferies, Daniel E Graves, Jeffrey S Heinle, Charles D Fraser.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Recently, there has been a surge of interest by clinicians, industry, and the government in the development and use of ventricular assist devices (VAD) in children. Despite this rapidly expanding interest, the incidence of VAD use in children across the United States is unknown. The Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (H-CUP) Kids' Inpatients Database (KID) was analyzed to characterize the current utilization of VADs in children nationwide.
METHODS: The most recent HCUP-KID (2006) was analyzed (n = 7.5 million). This database is a nationwide sampling of hospital discharges of patients less than 20 years old weighted to provide national estimates.
RESULTS: In 2006, 187 children had a VAD implanted in the United States. Mean age was 13 ± 7 years. Forty patients (21%) were bridged to VAD by extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Forty-nine patients (26%) were bridged to heart transplant. Fifty-six patients (30%) died in hospital. Eighty-six patients (46%) were discharged or transferred. Length of stay was 29 days (range, 0 to 285). Total cost was $174,743 (range, $4,230 to $1,911,588). Sixty-seven hospitals placed VADs; 66% of VADs (124) were implanted at large teaching hospitals (more than 500 beds), and 46% (85) were at high-volume hospitals (more than 5 VADs per year). High-volume, large teaching hospitals (10) had better survival (89% versus 61%; p < 0.001) and lower hospital cost ($236,000 ± $184,000 versus $300,000 ± $355,000; p = 0.002) compared with all other hospitals. On multivariate analysis, acute renal failure and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation were risk factors for mortality, whereas transplant and being at a high-volume large teaching hospital were protective factors from death.
CONCLUSIONS: Preliminary data suggest that the growing use of VADs in children may be better served in regard to resource utilization and outcomes if centralized to high-volume large teaching hospitals.
Copyright © 2010 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20868835     DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2010.04.107

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  20 in total

1.  Early Biventricular Assist Device Use in Children: A Single-Center Review of 31 Patients.

Authors:  Jacob R Miller; Deirdre J Epstein; Matthew C Henn; Tracey Guthrie; Richard B Schuessler; Kathleen E Simpson; Charles E Canter; Pirooz Eghtesady; Umar S Boston
Journal:  ASAIO J       Date:  2015 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.872

Review 2.  Collaboration and new data in ACTION: a learning health care system to improve pediatric heart failure and ventricular assist device outcomes.

Authors:  David M Peng; David N Rosenthal; Farhan Zafar; Lauren Smyth; Christina J VanderPluym; Angela Lorts
Journal:  Transl Pediatr       Date:  2019-10

3.  Influence of Transplant Center Procedural Volume on Survival Outcomes of Heart Transplantation for Children Bridged with Mechanical Circulatory Support.

Authors:  Alex Hsieh; Dmitry Tumin; Patrick I McConnell; Mark Galantowicz; Joseph D Tobias; Don Hayes
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2016-11-24       Impact factor: 1.655

4.  Mechanical circulatory support in pediatrics.

Authors:  Fabrizio Gandolfo; Fabrizio De Rita; Asif Hasan; Massimo Griselli
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2014-09

5.  Mechanical circulatory support costs in children bridged to heart transplantation - analysis of a linked database.

Authors:  Justin Godown; Andrew H Smith; Cary Thurm; Matt Hall; Debra A Dodd; Jonathan H Soslow; Bret A Mettler; David W Bearl; Brian Feingold
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2018-04-06       Impact factor: 4.749

Review 6.  Current approaches to device implantation in pediatric and congenital heart disease patients.

Authors:  Jacob R Miller; Timothy S Lancaster; Pirooz Eghtesady
Journal:  Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther       Date:  2015-03-03

7.  Initial experience with a juvenile sheep model for evaluation of the pediatric intracorporeal ventricular assist devices [corrected].

Authors:  Xufeng Wei; Tieluo Li; Pablo G Sanchez; Pablo Sanchez; Amelia Watkins; Shuying Li; Christopher DeFilippi; Zhongjun J Wu; Bartley P Griffith
Journal:  ASAIO J       Date:  2013 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.872

8.  Outcomes of children with congenital heart disease implanted with ventricular assist devices: An analysis of the Pediatric Interagency Registry for Mechanical Circulatory Support (Pedimacs).

Authors:  David M Peng; Devin A Koehl; Ryan S Cantor; Kristen N McMillan; Aliessa P Barnes; Patrick I McConnell; Jessica Jordan; Nicholas D Andersen; James D St Louis; Katsuhide Maeda; James K Kirklin; Steven J Kindel
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2018-10-31       Impact factor: 10.247

9.  Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation versus counterpulsatile, pulsatile, and continuous left ventricular unloading for pediatric mechanical circulatory support.

Authors:  Carlo R Bartoli; Steven C Koenig; Constantine Ionan; Kevin J Gillars; Mike E Mitchell; Erle H Austin; Laman A Gray; George M Pantalos
Journal:  Pediatr Crit Care Med       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 3.624

10.  Hospital Charges for Pediatric Heart Failure-Related Hospitalizations from 2000 to 2009.

Authors:  Deipanjan Nandi; Kimberly Y Lin; Matthew J O'Connor; Okan U Elci; Jeffrey J Kim; Jamie A Decker; Jack F Price; Farhan Zafar; David L S Morales; Susan W Denfield; William J Dreyer; John L Jefferies; Joseph W Rossano
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2015-12-08       Impact factor: 1.655

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.