Literature DB >> 20864879

International classification of reliability for implanted cochlear implant receiver stimulators.

Rolf-Dieter Battmer1, Douglas D Backous, Thomas J Balkany, Robert J S Briggs, Bruce J Gantz, Andrew van Hasselt, Chong Sun Kim, Takeshi Kubo, Thomas Lenarz, Harold C Pillsbury, Gerard M O'Donoghue.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To design an international standard to be used when reporting reliability of the implanted components of cochlear implant systems to appropriate governmental authorities, cochlear implant (CI) centers, and for journal editors in evaluating manuscripts involving cochlear implant reliability. STUDY
DESIGN: The International Consensus Group for Cochlear Implant Reliability Reporting was assembled to unify ongoing efforts in the United States, Europe, Asia, and Australia to create a consistent and comprehensive classification system for the implanted components of CI systems across manufacturers.
SETTING: All members of the consensus group are from tertiary referral cochlear implant centers.
INTERVENTIONS: None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: A clinically relevant classification scheme adapted from principles of ISO standard 5841-2:2000 originally designed for reporting reliability of cardiac pacemakers, pulse generators, or leads.
RESULTS: Standard definitions for device failure, survival time, clinical benefit, reduced clinical benefit, and specification were generated. Time intervals for reporting back to implant centers for devices tested to be "out of specification," categorization of explanted devices, the method of cumulative survival reporting, and content of reliability reports to be issued by manufacturers was agreed upon by all members. The methodology for calculating Cumulative survival was adapted from ISO standard 5841-2:2000.
CONCLUSION: The International Consensus Group on Cochlear Implant Device Reliability Reporting recommends compliance to this new standard in reporting reliability of implanted CI components by all manufacturers of CIs and the adoption of this standard as a minimal reporting guideline for editors of journals publishing cochlear implant research results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20864879      PMCID: PMC4886654          DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e3181d2798e

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otol Neurotol        ISSN: 1531-7129            Impact factor:   2.311


  4 in total

1.  European consensus statement on cochlear implant failures and explantations.

Authors: 
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 2.311

Review 2.  Cochlear implant soft failures consensus development conference statement.

Authors:  T J Balkany; A V Hodges; C A Buchman; W M Luxford; C H Pillsbury; P S Roland; J K Shallop; D D Backous; D Franz; J M Graham; B Hirsch; M Luntz; J K Niparko; J Patrick; S L Payne; F F Telischi; E A Tobey; E Truy; S Staller
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 2.311

3.  A multicenter study of device failure in European cochlear implant centers.

Authors:  Rolf-Dieter Battmer; Gerard M O'Donoghue; Thomas Lenarz
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  Standardization of reliability reporting for cochlear implants: an interim report.

Authors:  Douglas D Backous; Stacey D Watson
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 3.570

  4 in total
  5 in total

1.  Multicenter evaluation of Neurelec Digisonic® SP cochlear implant reliability.

Authors:  Luminiţa Rădulescu; Sebastian Cozma; Casimir Niemczyk; Nicolas Guevara; Ivan Gahide; John Economides; Jean-Pierre Lavieille; Renaud Meller; Jean-Pierre Bébéar; Emilien Radafy; Philippe Bordure; Djamel Djennaoui; Eric Truy
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2012-11-18       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Simultaneous communication supports learning in noise by cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Helen Blom; Marc Marschark; Elizabeth Machmer
Journal:  Cochlear Implants Int       Date:  2016-12-23

3.  HiRes Ultra Series Recall: Failure Rates and Revision Speech Recognition Outcomes.

Authors:  Nathan R Lindquist; Nathan D Cass; Ankita Patro; Elizabeth L Perkins; René H Gifford; David S Haynes; Jourdan T Holder
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2022-08-01       Impact factor: 2.619

Review 4.  Cochlear implant - state of the art.

Authors:  Thomas Lenarz
Journal:  GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2018-02-19

Review 5.  Research Status and Future Development of Cochlear Reimplantation.

Authors:  Xinyi Yao; Haotian Liu; Jinyuan Si; Xiuyong Ding; Yu Zhao; Yun Zheng
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-03-21       Impact factor: 4.677

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.