Literature DB >> 20864268

Greater biopsy core number is associated with improved biochemical control in patients treated with permanent prostate brachytherapy.

Nathan Bittner1, Gregory S Merrick, Robert W Galbreath, Wayne M Butler, Edward Adamovich, Kent E Wallner.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Standard prostate biopsy schemes underestimate Gleason score in a significant percentage of cases. Extended biopsy improves diagnostic accuracy and provides more reliable prognostic information. In this study, we tested the hypothesis that greater biopsy core number should result in improved treatment outcome through better tailoring of therapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: From April 1995 to May 2006, 1,613 prostate cancer patients were treated with permanent brachytherapy. Patients were divided into five groups stratified by the number of prostate biopsy cores (≤6, 7-9, 10-12, 13-20, and >20 cores). Biochemical progression-free survival (bPFS), cause-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS) were evaluated as a function of core number.
RESULTS: The median patient age was 66 years, and the median preimplant prostate-specific antigen was 6.5 ng/mL. The overall 10-year bPFS, CSS, and OS were 95.6%, 98.3%, and 78.6%, respectively. When bPFS was analyzed as a function of core number, the 10-year bPFS for patients with >20, 13-20, 10-12, 7-9 and ≤6 cores was 100%, 100%, 98.3%, 95.8%, and 93.0% (p < 0.001), respectively. When evaluated by treatment era (1995-2000 vs. 2001-2006), the number of biopsy cores remained a statistically significant predictor of bPFS. On multivariate analysis, the number of biopsy cores was predictive of bPFS but did not predict for CSS or OS.
CONCLUSION: Greater biopsy core number was associated with a statistically significant improvement in bPFS. Comprehensive regional sampling of the prostate may enhance diagnostic accuracy compared to a standard biopsy scheme, resulting in better tailoring of therapy.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20864268     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.02.068

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  4 in total

Review 1.  An appraisal of analytical tools used in predicting clinical outcomes following radiation therapy treatment of men with prostate cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  Elspeth Raymond; Michael E O'Callaghan; Jared Campbell; Andrew D Vincent; Kerri Beckmann; David Roder; Sue Evans; John McNeil; Jeremy Millar; John Zalcberg; Martin Borg; Kim Moretti
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2017-03-21       Impact factor: 3.481

2.  Cost-containment protocols for prostate core needle biopsies: hypothetical scenarios to reduce procedural costs.

Authors:  Roberto Ruiz-Cordero; Alia Gupta; Andre Pinto; Merce Jorda
Journal:  Prostate Int       Date:  2018-02-20

3.  Stratification of brachytherapy-treated intermediate-risk prostate cancer patients into favorable and unfavorable cohorts.

Authors:  Gregory S Merrick; Wayne M Butler; Robert W Galbreath; Ryan Fiano; Edward Adamovich
Journal:  J Contemp Brachytherapy       Date:  2015-12-30

4.  Tumor burden and location as prognostic factors in patients treated by iodine seed implant brachytherapy for localized prostate cancers.

Authors:  Claire Meynard; Andres Huertas; Charles Dariane; Sandra Toublanc; Quentin Dubourg; Saik Urien; Marc-Olivier Timsit; Arnaud Méjean; Nicolas Thiounn; Philippe Giraud
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2019-12-31       Impact factor: 3.481

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.