Literature DB >> 20864239

Looking upstream to understand low back pain and return to work: psychosocial factors as the product of system issues.

Sophie Soklaridis1, Carlo Ammendolia, David Cassidy.   

Abstract

Low back pain (LBP) is the most common and expensive musculoskeletal (MSK) disorder in industrialized countries. There is evidence that personal and occupational psychosocial variables play a more important role than spinal pathology or the physical demands of the job. However, it is unclear which psychosocial variables are most important. The objective of this study is to understand which psychosocial variables are deemed most important to various workplace stakeholders involved in the process of returning a worker with LBP to work. Nine focus groups were convened with injured workers, small and large employers, unions, health and safety associations, physicians and non-physician clinicians, return to work coordinators and compensation board representatives in Ontario, Canada. A qualitative grounded theory approach was applied to explore, from their perspectives, important psychosocial factors that prevent the promotion of early and safe return to work (RTW) for individuals with LBP. While the study began by asking questions related to the various psychosocial factors and their association to LBP and RTW, it took an interesting turn. The majority of study participants described how psychosocial factors were the product of larger systemic/organizational issues. Rather than focusing solely on individual psychosocial factors, respondents described how the context of a much larger system, and the complex interplay between the many different components of that system, contributes directly or indirectly to the treatment of LBP and RTW. It is the interrelationships between these systems that determine the process of returning an injured worker with LBP back to work. Although it is important to understand how psychosocial factors affect RTW, organizational structures within our social context seem to play a role in shaping how all stakeholders see and emotionally respond to LBP and RTW, as well as the degree to which they can envision taking action on them. We need to consider moving beyond a psychosocial conceptualization of LBP and RTW into a sociopolitical and economic conceptualization. This reconceptualization provides insight into the "upstream factors" associated with LBP and RTW.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20864239     DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.08.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  18 in total

1.  The 'ability' paradigm in vocational rehabilitation: challenges in an Ontario injured worker retraining program.

Authors:  E MacEachen; A Kosny; S Ferrier; K Lippel; C Neilson; R L Franche; D Pugliese
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2012-03

2.  Quality of physiotherapy services for injured workers compensated by workers' compensation in Quebec: a focus group study of physiotherapy professionals.

Authors:  Anne Hudon; Maude Laliberté; Matthew Hunt; Debbie Ehrmann Feldman
Journal:  Healthc Policy       Date:  2015-02

3.  Personal resources and support when regaining the ability to work: an interview study with Exhaustion Disorder patients.

Authors:  Sofia Norlund; Anncristine Fjellman-Wiklund; Maria Nordin; Therese Stenlund; Christina Ahlgren
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2013-06

4.  Barriers to Return-to-Work for Linguistic Minorities in Ontario: An Analysis of Narratives from Appeal Decisions.

Authors:  Stephanie Premji
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2015-06

5.  Psychosocial Factors Impacting Workplace Injury Rehabilitation: Evaluation of a Concise Screening Tool.

Authors:  Sareen McLinton; Sarven Savia McLinton; Martin van der Linden
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2018-03

6.  Experiences, impacts and service needs of injured and ill workers in the WSIB process: evidence from Thunder Bay and District (Ontario, Canada).

Authors:  Chelsea Noël; Deborah Scharf; Joshua Hawkins; Jessie Lund; Jewel Kozik; Anna Péfoyo Koné
Journal:  Health Promot Chronic Dis Prev Can       Date:  2022-07       Impact factor: 2.725

7.  Framing the Care of Injured Workers: An Empirical Four-Jurisdictional Comparison of Workers' Compensation Boards' Healthcare Policies.

Authors:  Anne Hudon; Ellen MacEachen; Katherine Lippel
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2022-01-17

8.  Consequences of musculoskeletal disorders on occupational events: a life-long perspective from a national survey.

Authors:  Annette Leclerc; Pauline Pascal; Jean-François Chastang; Alexis Descatha
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2014-06

9.  Can chiropractors contribute to work disability prevention through sickness absence management for musculoskeletal disorders? - a comparative qualitative case study in the Scandinavian context.

Authors:  Mette Jensen Stochkendahl; Ole Kristoffer Larsen; Casper Glissmann Nim; Iben Axén; Julia Haraldsson; Ole Christian Kvammen; Corrie Myburgh
Journal:  Chiropr Man Therap       Date:  2018-04-26

10.  Returning to work after stroke: perspectives of employer stakeholders, a qualitative study.

Authors:  Carol Coole; Kathryn Radford; Mary Grant; Jane Terry
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2013-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.