Literature DB >> 20864218

The effect of pressure differential and care provider movement on airborne infectious isolation room containment effectiveness.

Noah J Adams1, David L Johnson, Robert A Lynch.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Airborne infectious isolation rooms (AIIRs) are maintained at a negative pressure relative to surrounding areas to prevent migration of potentially infectious droplet nuclei. Current US design standards require a pressure differential of only 2.5 Pascals (Pa), compared with 15 Pa in some other countries. The purpose of this work was to compare containment efficiency in a properly designed anteroom-equipped hospital AIIR at differential pressures ranging from 2.5 to 20 Pa under conditions of no provider traffic and simulated high provider traffic.
METHODS: Fluorescent microspheres were released into the AIIR to simulate infectious droplet nuclei. Airborne concentrations were measured inside the AIIR, in the anteroom, and at the corridor-anteroom door both with and without care provider movement through the AIIR under differential pressure conditions of 2.5, 11, and 20 Pa. Particles were collected by air sampling onto filters, with enumeration via fluorescent microscopy.
RESULTS: Reduced containment effectiveness during provider traffic was observed, consistent with previous studies. Containment increased with increasingly negative pressure differential and decreased with increasing provider traffic.
CONCLUSIONS: Provider traffic adversely affected containment. Containment improved with an increasing pressure differential. The anteroom plays an important role in limiting net particle escape, especially during provider movement through the space.
Copyright © 2011. Published by Mosby, Inc.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 20864218     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajic.2010.05.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Infect Control        ISSN: 0196-6553            Impact factor:   2.918


  11 in total

Review 1.  Ventilation control for airborne transmission of human exhaled bio-aerosols in buildings.

Authors:  Hua Qian; Xiaohong Zheng
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  Different types of door-opening motions as contributing factors to containment failures in hospital isolation rooms.

Authors:  Julian W Tang; Andre Nicolle; Jovan Pantelic; Christian A Klettner; Ruikun Su; Petri Kalliomaki; Pekka Saarinen; Hannu Koskela; Kari Reijula; Panu Mustakallio; David K W Cheong; Chandra Sekhar; Kwok Wai Tham
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-24       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Operationalization of an Expanded Anteroom in a COVID-19-Dedicated Hospital in South Korea.

Authors:  Kyoung Ja Moon; Soonyoung Shon; Hwasook Cho; Minseo Sung; Jin Young Kang; Younsuk Choi
Journal:  Inquiry       Date:  2022 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 2.099

Review 4.  The Effectiveness of the Anteroom (Vestibule) Area on Hospital Infection Control and Health Staff Safety: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Elham Andalib; Masoumeh Faghani; Seyyed Mahdi Zia Ziabari; Mohammad Shenagari; Hamid Salehiniya; Mohammad Hossein Keivanlou; Zahra Rafat
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-04-26

5.  Large Eddy Simulation of Air Escape through a Hospital Isolation Room Single Hinged Doorway--Validation by Using Tracer Gases and Simulated Smoke Videos.

Authors:  Pekka E Saarinen; Petri Kalliomäki; Julian W Tang; Hannu Koskela
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-07       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  Negative pressure of the environmental air in the cleaning area of the materials and sterilization center: a systematic review.

Authors:  Caroline Lopes Ciofi-Silva; Lisbeth Lima Hansen; Alda Graciele Claudio Dos Santos Almeida; Julia Yaeko Kawagoe; Maria Clara Padoveze; Kazuko Uchikawa Graziano
Journal:  Rev Lat Am Enfermagem       Date:  2016-09-01

7.  Implementing a negative-pressure isolation ward for a surge in airborne infectious patients.

Authors:  Shelly L Miller; Nicholas Clements; Steven A Elliott; Shobha S Subhash; Aaron Eagan; Lewis J Radonovich
Journal:  Am J Infect Control       Date:  2017-03-20       Impact factor: 2.918

8.  Isolation anterooms: important components of airborne infection control.

Authors:  Shobha S Subhash; Gio Baracco; Kevin P Fennelly; Michael Hodgson; Lewis J Radonovich
Journal:  Am J Infect Control       Date:  2012-10-02       Impact factor: 2.918

9.  Airflow patterns through single hinged and sliding doors in hospital isolation rooms - Effect of ventilation, flow differential and passage.

Authors:  Petri Kalliomäki; Pekka Saarinen; Julian W Tang; Hannu Koskela
Journal:  Build Environ       Date:  2016-07-15       Impact factor: 6.456

10.  Potential airborne pathogen transmission in a hospital with and without surge control ventilation system modifications.

Authors:  Francis J Offermann; Aaron Eagan; Aidan C Offermann; Shobha S Subhash; Shelly L Miller; Lewis J Radonovich
Journal:  Build Environ       Date:  2016-06-25       Impact factor: 6.456

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.