OBJECTIVE: In diagnosing symptomatic meniscal tear, clinicians often query patients with a "checklist" of symptoms such as "popping" or "catching." There has been little research on the reliability or diagnostic value of these terms. METHODS: We developed questions to elicit the presence of 11 checklist symptoms associated with meniscal tear and administered a survey with both "checklist" and expanded descriptions to study subjects. We examined the reliability of the checklist and expanded versions of each item. Validity was evaluated in relation to the clinical diagnosis of symptomatic meniscal tear, which consisted of the clinical impression of the treating orthopedic surgeon based upon physical examination, history, and magnetic resonance imaging. We developed a Meniscal Symptom Index, calculated as the sum of those expanded descriptive items that were independently associated with symptomatic meniscal tear in multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS: A total of 300 individuals (mean±SD age 52±12 years, 67% women) completed the survey. One hundred twenty-one had symptomatic meniscal tear. Test-retest reliability was higher for expanded descriptions than for checklist items. The Meniscal Symptom Index consisted of 4 expanded items: localized pain, clicking, catching, and giving way. Among the subjects with none of these symptoms, 16% (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 2%, 30%) had symptomatic meniscal tear, whereas among those with all 4 symptoms, 76% (95% CI 63%, 88%) had symptomatic meniscal tear (P for trend = 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Clinicians should use expanded symptom definitions when querying patients about meniscal symptoms. A newly developed Meniscal Symptom Index holds promise as a diagnostic tool and merits further validation.
OBJECTIVE: In diagnosing symptomatic meniscal tear, clinicians often query patients with a "checklist" of symptoms such as "popping" or "catching." There has been little research on the reliability or diagnostic value of these terms. METHODS: We developed questions to elicit the presence of 11 checklist symptoms associated with meniscal tear and administered a survey with both "checklist" and expanded descriptions to study subjects. We examined the reliability of the checklist and expanded versions of each item. Validity was evaluated in relation to the clinical diagnosis of symptomatic meniscal tear, which consisted of the clinical impression of the treating orthopedic surgeon based upon physical examination, history, and magnetic resonance imaging. We developed a Meniscal Symptom Index, calculated as the sum of those expanded descriptive items that were independently associated with symptomatic meniscal tear in multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS: A total of 300 individuals (mean±SD age 52±12 years, 67% women) completed the survey. One hundred twenty-one had symptomatic meniscal tear. Test-retest reliability was higher for expanded descriptions than for checklist items. The Meniscal Symptom Index consisted of 4 expanded items: localized pain, clicking, catching, and giving way. Among the subjects with none of these symptoms, 16% (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 2%, 30%) had symptomatic meniscal tear, whereas among those with all 4 symptoms, 76% (95% CI 63%, 88%) had symptomatic meniscal tear (P for trend = 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Clinicians should use expanded symptom definitions when querying patients about meniscal symptoms. A newly developed Meniscal Symptom Index holds promise as a diagnostic tool and merits further validation.
Authors: R Altman; E Asch; D Bloch; G Bole; D Borenstein; K Brandt; W Christy; T D Cooke; R Greenwald; M Hochberg Journal: Arthritis Rheum Date: 1986-08
Authors: Sandip Biswal; Trevor Hastie; Thomas P Andriacchi; Gabrielle A Bergman; Michael F Dillingham; Philipp Lang Journal: Arthritis Rheum Date: 2002-11
Authors: E M Tan; A S Cohen; J F Fries; A T Masi; D J McShane; N F Rothfield; J G Schaller; N Talal; R J Winchester Journal: Arthritis Rheum Date: 1982-11
Authors: Valentin Lance; Ursula R Heilmeier; Gabby B Joseph; Lynne Steinbach; Benjamin Ma; Thomas M Link Journal: Skeletal Radiol Date: 2014-11-16 Impact factor: 2.199
Authors: Jeffrey N Katz; Savannah R Smith; Heidi Y Yang; Scott D Martin; John Wright; Laurel A Donnell-Fink; Elena Losina Journal: Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) Date: 2017-03-03 Impact factor: 4.794
Authors: Denise O'Connor; Renea V Johnston; Romina Brignardello-Petersen; Rudolf W Poolman; Sheila Cyril; Per O Vandvik; Rachelle Buchbinder Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2022-03-03
Authors: Jeffrey N Katz; Christine E Chaisson; Brian Cole; Ali Guermazi; David J Hunter; Morgan Jones; Bruce A Levy; Lisa A Mandl; Scott Martin; Robert G Marx; Clare Safran-Norton; Frank W Roemer; Debra Skoniecki; Daniel H Solomon; Kurt P Spindler; John Wright; Rick W Wright; Elena Losina Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2012-09-05 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: Jeffrey N Katz; Robert H Brophy; Christine E Chaisson; Leigh de Chaves; Brian J Cole; Diane L Dahm; Laurel A Donnell-Fink; Ali Guermazi; Amanda K Haas; Morgan H Jones; Bruce A Levy; Lisa A Mandl; Scott D Martin; Robert G Marx; Anthony Miniaci; Matthew J Matava; Joseph Palmisano; Emily K Reinke; Brian E Richardson; Benjamin N Rome; Clare E Safran-Norton; Debra J Skoniecki; Daniel H Solomon; Matthew V Smith; Kurt P Spindler; Michael J Stuart; John Wright; Rick W Wright; Elena Losina Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2013-03-18 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Lindsey A MacFarlane; Heidi Yang; Jamie E Collins; Robert H Brophy; Brian J Cole; Kurt P Spindler; Ali Guermazi; Morgan H Jones; Lisa A Mandl; Scott Martin; Robert G Marx; Bruce A Levy; Michael Stuart; Clare Safran-Norton; John Wright; Rick W Wright; Elena Losina; Jeffrey N Katz Journal: Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) Date: 2022-05-06 Impact factor: 5.178
Authors: Bhushan R Deshpande; Elena Losina; Savannah R Smith; Scott D Martin; R John Wright; Jeffrey N Katz Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord Date: 2016-04-11 Impact factor: 2.362