Literature DB >> 20862435

Advantages of toxicokinetic and toxicodynamic modelling in aquatic ecotoxicology and risk assessment.

Roman Ashauer1, Beate I Escher.   

Abstract

Toxicokinetic-toxicodynamic (TK-TD) models simulate the processes that lead to toxicity at the level of organisms over time. These dynamic simulation models quantify toxicity, but more importantly they also provide a conceptual framework to better understand the causes for variability in different species' sensitivity to the same compound as well as causes for different toxicity of different compounds to the same species. Thus TK-TD models bring advantages for very diverse ecotoxicological questions as they can address two major challenges: the large number of species that are potentially affected and the large number of chemicals of concern. The first important benefit of TK-TD models is the role that they can play to formalize established knowledge about toxicity of compounds, sensitivity of organisms, organism recovery times and carry-over toxicity. The second important aspect of TK-TD models is their ability to simulate temporal aspects of toxicity which makes them excellent extrapolation tools for risk assessment of fluctuating or pulsed exposures to pollutants. We provide a general introduction to the concept of TK-TD modelling for environmental scientists and discuss opportunities as well as current limitations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20862435     DOI: 10.1039/c0em00234h

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Environ Monit        ISSN: 1464-0325


  22 in total

1.  Reconsidering sufficient and optimal test design in acute toxicity testing.

Authors:  Tjalling Jager
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 2.823

2.  Experimental studies with nematodes in ecotoxicology: an overview.

Authors:  Arne Hägerbäumer; Sebastian Höss; Peter Heininger; Walter Traunspurger
Journal:  J Nematol       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 1.402

Review 3.  A framework for predicting impacts on ecosystem services from (sub)organismal responses to chemicals.

Authors:  Valery E Forbes; Chris J Salice; Bjorn Birnir; Randy J F Bruins; Peter Calow; Virginie Ducrot; Nika Galic; Kristina Garber; Bret C Harvey; Henriette Jager; Andrew Kanarek; Robert Pastorok; Steve F Railsback; Richard Rebarber; Pernille Thorbek
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 3.742

4.  Toxicokinetic-toxicodynamic modelling of survival of Gammarus pulex in multiple pulse exposures to propiconazole: model assumptions, calibration data requirements and predictive power.

Authors:  Anna-Maija Nyman; Kristin Schirmer; Roman Ashauer
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2012-05-05       Impact factor: 2.823

5.  Significance of xenobiotic metabolism for bioaccumulation kinetics of organic chemicals in Gammarus pulex.

Authors:  Roman Ashauer; Anita Hintermeister; Isabel O'Connor; Maline Elumelu; Juliane Hollender; Beate I Escher
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2012-02-28       Impact factor: 9.028

6.  Environmental risk assessment of fluctuating diazinon concentrations in an urban and agricultural catchment using toxicokinetic-toxicodynamic modeling.

Authors:  Roman Ashauer; Irene Wittmer; Christian Stamm; Beate I Escher
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2011-10-19       Impact factor: 9.028

7.  Predicting concentrations of organic chemicals in fish by using toxicokinetic models.

Authors:  Julita Stadnicka; Kristin Schirmer; Roman Ashauer
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2012-02-28       Impact factor: 9.028

8.  A method to predict and understand fish survival under dynamic chemical stress using standard ecotoxicity data.

Authors:  Roman Ashauer; Pernille Thorbek; Jacqui S Warinton; James R Wheeler; Steve Maund
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2013-03-04       Impact factor: 3.742

9.  A list of fish species that are potentially exposed to pesticides in edge-of-field water bodies in the European Union--a first step towards identifying vulnerable representatives for risk assessment.

Authors:  Lara Ibrahim; Thomas G Preuss; Hans Toni Ratte; Udo Hommen
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2013-01-17       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 10.  The pros and cons of ecological risk assessment based on data from different levels of biological organization.

Authors:  Jason R Rohr; Christopher J Salice; Roger M Nisbet
Journal:  Crit Rev Toxicol       Date:  2016-06-24       Impact factor: 6.184

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.