Literature DB >> 20861867

Genetic correlation of blood pressure responses to dietary sodium and potassium intervention and cold pressor test in Chinese population.

H Mei1, T K Rice, D Gu, J E Hixson, C E Jaquish, Qi Zhao, J-C Chen, J Cao, J Li, T N Kelly, D C Rao, J He.   

Abstract

We examined the genetic association between blood pressure (BP) responses to dietary sodium and potassium intervention and to cold pressor test (CPT) in a large family-based dietary feeding study. The dietary intervention and CPT were conducted among 1906 participants in rural China. The dietary intervention included three 7-day periods of low-sodium feeding (51.3 mmol per day), high-sodium feeding (307.8 mmol per day) and high-sodium feeding plus potassium supplementation (60 mmol per day). BP responses to high-sodium intervention had strong genetic correlations (ρ(G)) with both BP responses to low sodium (ρ(G)=-0.43 to -0.54, P-values=0.0005 to 0.03) and to potassium supplementation (ρ(G)=-0.41 to -0.49, P-values=0.001 to 0.005) interventions. Most environmental correlations between BP responses to various dietary interventions were significant. The ρ(G) between BP responses to CPT and to high-sodium intervention and potassium supplementation were statistically significant. For example, the ρ(G) between maximum BP responses to CPT and BP responses to high-sodium intervention was 0.37 (P=0.006) for systolic BP (SBP) and 0.41 (P=0.002) for diastolic BP (DBP). The ρ(G) between maximum BP responses to CPT and BP responses to potassium intervention was -0.42 (P=0.001) for SBP and -0.46 (P=0.001) for SBP. Our study suggests that there are common genetic determinants that influence BP responses to dietary sodium and potassium interventions and to CPT.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20861867      PMCID: PMC3164824          DOI: 10.1038/jhh.2010.88

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hum Hypertens        ISSN: 0950-9240            Impact factor:   3.012


  36 in total

1.  Maximum-likelihood generalized heritability estimate for blood pressure in Nigerian families.

Authors:  C N Rotimi; R S Cooper; G Cao; O Ogunbiyi; M Ladipo; E Owoaje; R Ward
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 10.190

2.  Studies on genes and hypertension: a daunting task.

Authors:  Juan M Saavedra
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 4.844

3.  Heritability of salt sensitivity in black Americans.

Authors:  L P Svetkey; S P McKeown; A F Wilson
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 10.190

4.  Bivariate quantitative trait linkage analysis: pleiotropy versus co-incident linkages.

Authors:  L Almasy; T D Dyer; J Blangero
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 2.135

5.  Genetic and environmental contributions to cardiovascular risk factors in Mexican Americans. The San Antonio Family Heart Study.

Authors:  B D Mitchell; C M Kammerer; J Blangero; M C Mahaney; D L Rainwater; B Dyke; J E Hixson; R D Henkel; R M Sharp; A G Comuzzie; J L VandeBerg; M P Stern; J W MacCluer
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1996-11-01       Impact factor: 29.690

6.  Genetic influences on blood pressure with the cold-pressor test: a twin study.

Authors:  A Busjahn; H D Faulhaber; R J Viken; R J Rose; F C Luft
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 4.844

7.  Multipoint quantitative-trait linkage analysis in general pedigrees.

Authors:  L Almasy; J Blangero
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 11.025

8.  Effects of oral potassium on blood pressure. Meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials.

Authors:  P K Whelton; J He; J A Cutler; F L Brancati; L J Appel; D Follmann; M J Klag
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1997-05-28       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Effect of reduced dietary sodium on blood pressure: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  J P Midgley; A G Matthew; C M Greenwood; A G Logan
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1996 May 22-29       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Intersalt revisited: further analyses of 24 hour sodium excretion and blood pressure within and across populations. Intersalt Cooperative Research Group.

Authors:  P Elliott; J Stamler; R Nichols; A R Dyer; R Stamler; H Kesteloot; M Marmot
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-05-18
View more
  5 in total

1.  Common variants in epithelial sodium channel genes contribute to salt sensitivity of blood pressure: The GenSalt study.

Authors:  Qi Zhao; Dongfeng Gu; James E Hixson; De-Pei Liu; Dabeeru C Rao; Cashell E Jaquish; Tanika N Kelly; Fanghong Lu; Jixiang Ma; Jianjun Mu; Lawrence C Shimmin; Jichun Chen; Hao Mei; L Lee Hamm; Jiang He
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Genet       Date:  2011-05-11

2.  High-resolution mapping of a novel rat blood pressure locus on chromosome 9 to a region containing the Spp2 gene and colocalization of a QTL for bone mass.

Authors:  Ying Nie; Sivarajan Kumarasamy; Harshal Waghulde; Xi Cheng; Blair Mell; Piotr J Czernik; Beata Lecka-Czernik; Bina Joe
Journal:  Physiol Genomics       Date:  2016-04-25       Impact factor: 3.107

3.  Association between genetic variants of the ADD1 and GNB3 genes and blood pressure response to the cold pressor test in a Chinese Han population: the GenSalt Study.

Authors:  Laiyuan Wang; Shufeng Chen; Qi Zhao; James E Hixson; Dabeeru C Rao; Cashell E Jaquish; Jianfeng Huang; Xiangfeng Lu; Jichun Chen; Jie Cao; Jianxin Li; Hongfan Li; Jiang He; De-Pei Liu; Dongfeng Gu
Journal:  Hypertens Res       Date:  2012-04-05       Impact factor: 3.872

Review 4.  Towards Precision Medicine for Hypertension: A Review of Genomic, Epigenomic, and Microbiomic Effects on Blood Pressure in Experimental Rat Models and Humans.

Authors:  Sandosh Padmanabhan; Bina Joe
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2017-10-01       Impact factor: 37.312

5.  Associations of Dietary Sodium, Potassium, and Sodium to Potassium Ratio with Blood Pressure- Regional Disparities in China.

Authors:  Lina Huang; Huijun Wang; Zhihong Wang; Yun Wang; Bing Zhang; Gangqiang Ding
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2020-01-30       Impact factor: 5.717

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.