Literature DB >> 20861428

Microstimulation of posterior parietal cortex biases the selection of eye movement goals during search.

Koorosh Mirpour1, Wei Song Ong, James W Bisley.   

Abstract

People can find objects in a visual scene fast and effortlessly. It is thought that this may be accomplished by creating a map of the outside world that incorporates bottom-up sensory and top-down cognitive inputs--a priority map. Eye movements are made toward the location represented by the highest activity on the priority map. We hypothesized that the lateral intraparietal area (LIP) of posterior parietal cortex acts as such a map. To test this, we performed low current microstimulation on animals trained to perform a foraging task and asked whether we could bias the animals to make a saccade to a particular stimulus, by creating an artificial peak of activity at the location representing that stimulus on the map. We found that microstimulation slightly biased the animals to make saccades to visual stimuli at the stimulated location, without actively generating saccades. The magnitude of this effect was small, but it appeared to be similar for all visual stimuli. We interpret these results to mean that microstimulation slightly biased saccade goal selection to the object represented at the stimulated location in LIP.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20861428      PMCID: PMC3007667          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00397.2010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  54 in total

1.  Effects of similarity and history on neural mechanisms of visual selection.

Authors:  N P Bichot; J D Schall
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Microstimulation of cortical area MT affects performance on a visual working memory task.

Authors:  J W Bisley; D Zaksas; T Pasternak
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  A saliency-based search mechanism for overt and covert shifts of visual attention.

Authors:  L Itti; C Koch
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Neural correlates of decision variables in parietal cortex.

Authors:  M L Platt; P W Glimcher
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1999-07-15       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  The detection of visual signals by macaque frontal eye field during masking.

Authors:  K G Thompson; J D Schall
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 24.884

6.  Microstimulation of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex biases saccade target selection.

Authors:  Ioan Opris; Andrei Barborica; Vincent P Ferrera
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Electrical microstimulation distinguishes distinct saccade-related areas in the posterior parietal cortex.

Authors:  P Thier; R A Andersen
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 8.  Computational modelling of visual attention.

Authors:  L Itti; C Koch
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 34.870

9.  Control of eye movements and spatial attention.

Authors:  T Moore; M Fallah
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-01-16       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Subcortical modulation of attention counters change blindness.

Authors:  James Cavanaugh; Robert H Wurtz
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2004-12-15       Impact factor: 6.709

View more
  24 in total

1.  Dissociating activity in the lateral intraparietal area from value using a visual foraging task.

Authors:  Koorosh Mirpour; James W Bisley
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-06-05       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  LIP activity in the interstimulus interval of a change detection task biases the behavioral response.

Authors:  Fabrice Arcizet; Koorosh Mirpour; Daniel J Foster; Caroline J Charpentier; James W Bisley
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Evidence for differential top-down and bottom-up suppression in posterior parietal cortex.

Authors:  Koorosh Mirpour; James W Bisley
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-09-09       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  A pure salience response in posterior parietal cortex.

Authors:  Fabrice Arcizet; Koorosh Mirpour; James W Bisley
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2011-03-21       Impact factor: 5.357

5.  Remapping, Spatial Stability, and Temporal Continuity: From the Pre-Saccadic to Postsaccadic Representation of Visual Space in LIP.

Authors:  Koorosh Mirpour; James W Bisley
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2015-07-04       Impact factor: 5.357

6.  Parietal neurons encode expected gains in instrumental information.

Authors:  Nicholas C Foley; Simon P Kelly; Himanshu Mhatre; Manuel Lopes; Jacqueline Gottlieb
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-04-03       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Neurons in FEF Keep Track of Items That Have Been Previously Fixated in Free Viewing Visual Search.

Authors:  Koorosh Mirpour; Zeinab Bolandnazar; James W Bisley
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-01-15       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Distinct roles of prefrontal and parietal areas in the encoding of attentional priority.

Authors:  Panagiotis Sapountzis; Sofia Paneri; Georgia G Gregoriou
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-08-28       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Activity in LIP, But not V4, Matches Performance When Attention is Spread.

Authors:  Fabrice Arcizet; Koorosh Mirpour; Daniel J Foster; James W Bisley
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2018-12-01       Impact factor: 5.357

10.  Anticipatory remapping of attentional priority across the entire visual field.

Authors:  Koorosh Mirpour; James W Bisley
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-11-14       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.