Literature DB >> 20861170

Imaging the reconstruction of true and false memories using sensory reactivation and the misinformation paradigms.

Craig E L Stark1, Yoko Okado, Elizabeth F Loftus.   

Abstract

Many current theories of false memories propose that, when we retrieve a memory, we are not reactivating a veridical, fixed representation of a past event, but are rather reactivating incomplete fragments that may be accurate or distorted and may have arisen from other events. By presenting the two phases of the misinformation paradigm in different modalities, we could observe sensory reactivation of the auditory and visual cortex during the retrieval phase. Overall, true and false memories showed similar brain activation, but could be distinguished by this reactivation. This was true only in the early regions of the sensory cortex.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20861170     DOI: 10.1101/lm.1845710

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Learn Mem        ISSN: 1072-0502            Impact factor:   2.460


  24 in total

1.  Whatever gave you that idea? False memories following equivalence training: a behavioral account of the misinformation effect.

Authors:  Danna M Challies; Maree Hunt; Maryanne Garry; David N Harper
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Memory and law: what can cognitive neuroscience contribute?

Authors:  Daniel L Schacter; Elizabeth F Loftus
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 24.884

3.  The relationship between DRM and misinformation false memories.

Authors:  Bi Zhu; Chuansheng Chen; Elizabeth F Loftus; Chongde Lin; Qi Dong
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2013-08

4.  The neurocognitive basis of borrowed context information.

Authors:  Meagan O'Neill; Rachel A Diana
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2017-01-30       Impact factor: 4.027

5.  False recognition of objects in visual scenes: findings from a combined direct and indirect memory test.

Authors:  Yana Weinstein; Robert A Nash
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2013-01

Review 6.  Memory distortion: an adaptive perspective.

Authors:  Daniel L Schacter; Scott A Guerin; Peggy L St Jacques
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2011-09-09       Impact factor: 20.229

7.  What's the gist? The influence of schemas on the neural correlates underlying true and false memories.

Authors:  Christina E Webb; Indira C Turney; Nancy A Dennis
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2016-09-30       Impact factor: 3.139

8.  Neural context reinstatement predicts memory misattribution.

Authors:  Samuel J Gershman; Anna C Schapiro; Almut Hupbach; Kenneth A Norman
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-05-15       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Statistical improvements in functional magnetic resonance imaging analyses produced by censoring high-motion data points.

Authors:  Joshua S Siegel; Jonathan D Power; Joseph W Dubis; Alecia C Vogel; Jessica A Church; Bradley L Schlaggar; Steven E Petersen
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2013-07-17       Impact factor: 5.038

10.  Assessing recollection and familiarity of similar lures in a behavioral pattern separation task.

Authors:  Jennifer Kim; Michael A Yassa
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2013-02-08       Impact factor: 3.899

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.