| Literature DB >> 20860788 |
Lisa VanHoose1, Youssef Sawers, Rajprasad Loganathan, James L Vacek, Lisa Stehno-Bittel, Lesya Novikova, Muhammed Al-Jarrah, Irina V Smirnova.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Early markers of diabetic autonomic neuropathy (DAN) in an electrocardiogram (ECG) include elevated R wave amplitudes, widening of QTc intervals and decreased heart rate variability (HRV). The severity of DAN has a direct relationship with mortality risk. Aerobic exercise training is a common recommendation for the delay and possible reversal of cardiac dysfunction. Limited research exists on ECG measures for the evaluation of aerobic exercise training in Zucker Diabetic Fatty (ZDF) rat, a model of type 2 diabetes. The objective of this study was to assess whether aerobic exercise training may attenuate diabetes induced ECG changes.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2010 PMID: 20860788 PMCID: PMC2954909 DOI: 10.1186/1475-2840-9-56
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cardiovasc Diabetol ISSN: 1475-2840 Impact factor: 9.951
Animal characteristics at baseline and termination
| Sedentary Control | Sedentary Diabetic | Exercised Control | Exercised Diabetic | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baseline | Term | Baseline | Term | Baseline | Term | Baseline | Term | |
| 326 ± 13 | 381 ± 13 | 409 ± 34a, b, f | 457 ± 41a, b, f | 309 ± 30c, f | 366 ± 22c, f | 374 ± 24b, c, e | 390 ± 23b, c | |
| 115 ± 9 | 145 ± 9 | 433 ± 144a, f | 579 ± 35a, f | 111 ± 11c, f | 156 ± 12c, f | 491 ± 136c | 584 ± 22c, e | |
| ND | 4.2 ± 0.3 | ND | 13.0 ± 0.0a, f | ND | 4.7 ± 0.3c, d, f | ND | 13.0 ± 0.0c, e | |
| 355 ± 148 | 416 ± 190 | 393 ± 68 | 423 ± 84 | 358 ± 139 | 408 ± 100 | 397 ± 73 | 413 ± 81 | |
| 1.24 ± 0.12 | 1.29 ± 0.09f | 1.15 ± 0.08d, f | 1.22 ± 0.10 | |||||
| 3.27 ± 0.04 | 3.02 ± 0.03 | 3.16 ± 0.02 | 3.09 ± 0.03 | |||||
Data are means ± SEs for each group with n as indicated. Statistical significance: Between group differences at baseline or termination (term) of p ≤ 0.05; ND - not determined; aSC vs SD, bSD vs ED, cEC vs ED, dSC vs EC, eSC vs ED and fSD vs EC.
Figure 1Weekly mean body weight measurements. Data are means ± SEs for each group with n = 12 for sedentary diabetic (SD) and exercised control (EC); and n = 10 for sedentary control (SC) and exercise diabetic (ED) rats.
Figure 2Mean R wave amplitude changes. Data are means ± SEs for each group with n = 12 for sedentary diabetic (SD) and exercised control (EC); and n = 10 for sedentary control (SC) and exercise diabetic (ED) rats. Statistical significance with p ≤ 0.05; aSC vs SD, bSD vs ED and fSD vs EC.
Figure 3Mean T wave amplitudes. Data are means ± SEs for each group with n = 12 for sedentary diabetic (SD) and exercised control (EC); and n = 10 for sedentary control (SC) and exercise diabetic (ED) rats. Statistical significance with p ≤ 0.05; bSD vs ED.
Figure 4Mean P wave amplitudes. Data are means ± SEs for each group with n = 12 for sedentary diabetic (SD) and exercised control (EC); and n = 10 for sedentary control (SC) and exercise diabetic (ED) rats. Statistical significance (p < 0.001) between baseline and termination values was found in all four animal groups.
ECG interval measurements
| Sedentary Control | Sedentary Diabetic | Exercised Control | Exercised Diabetic | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baseline | Term | Baseline | Term | Baseline | Term | Baseline | Term | |
| 0.195 ± 0.077 | 0.152 ± 0.041 | 0.158 ± 0.033 | 0.132 ± 0.012 | 0.191 ± 0.073 | 0.158 ± 0.048 | 0.157 ± 0.036 | 0.135 ± 0.012 | |
| 0.016 ± 0.005 | 0.022 ± 0.002 | 0.020 ± 0.002a, f | 0.022 ± 0.004 | 0.016 ± 0.004c, f | 0.023 ± 0.003 | 0.020 ± 0.002c, e | 0.021 ± 0.004 | |
| 0.043 ± 0.012 | 0.040 ± 0.005 | 0.064 ± 0.013a, f | 0.051 ± 0.012a, f | 0.045 ± 0.012c, f | 0.041 ± 0.006c, f | 0.062 ± 0.011c, e | 0.052 ± 0.013c, e | |
| 0.105 ± 0.043 | 0.105 ± 0.020 | 0.163 ± 0.033a, f | 0.134 ± 0.034a, f | 0.111 ± 0.043c, f | 0.106 ± 0.018c, f | 0.159 ± 0.026c, e | 0.134 ± 0.037c, e | |
| 0.032 ± 0.010 | 0.030 ± 0.006 | 0.045 ± 0.011a, f | 0.034 ± 0.008 | 0.036 ± 0.012c, f | 0.030 ± 0.005 | 0.046 ± 0.011c, e | 0.034 ± 0.009 | |
Data are means ± SEs for each group with n as indicated. Statistical significance: Between group differences at baseline or termination (term) of p ≤ 0.05; aSC vs SD, cEC vs ED, eSC vs ED and fSD vs EC.