BACKGROUND: The vitamin D receptor (VDR) has been studied as a novel target for cancer therapy in many tissue types as VDR ligands decrease cell proliferation in vitro and decrease tumor growth in vivo in sensitive cells. The objective of this study was to analyze the response to VDR agonist therapy in a panel of validated thyroid cancer cells and assess genetic markers predicting sensitivity and resistance to calcitriol and the noncalcemic analog DP006. METHODS: Thyroid cancer cell lines were analyzed for VDR and RXR protein by Western blot. Cell growth after VDR agonist treatment (calcitriol or DP006) was assessed after 6 days of treatment by viable cell assay. To investigate calcitriol/DP006 resistance in VDR-expressing cells, the VDR was sequenced and 1-α and 24-hydroxylase mRNA expression was assessed. RESULTS: VDR protein was variably expressed in the thyroid cancer cell lines and its presence was not sufficient for decreased viable cell count in response to calcitriol or DP006. The most sensitive cells (TPC1) have an ff FokI VDR polymorphism and the most resistant cells (HTh7 and 8505C) have an FF FokI VDR. This is a unique finding given that the balance of the literature of VDR polymorphisms describes an association of the ff FokI polymorphism with cancer risk and/or decreased VDR transactivation. 1-α and 24-hydroxylase mRNA expression before and after VDR agonist therapy was examined. 1-α-Hydroxylase levels did not change after calcitriol treatment. However, we found that higher baseline 24-hydroxylase levels and/or lower stimulation of 24-hydroxylase levels after calcitriol treatment were associated with relative resistance to calcitriol/DP006. CONCLUSIONS: The VDR represents a novel therapeutic target in poorly differentiated thyroid cancer; however, the efficacy of VDR agonist therapy to decrease viable thyroid cancer cell count cannot be predicted solely on the presence of the VDR. The FF FokI VDR genotype and high baseline 24-hydroxylase levels were associated with relative resistance to calcitriol and DP006. Therefore, identifiable markers of sensitivity or resistance to VDR agonist therapy may allow for a personalized use of these agents in poorly differentiated thyroid cancer.
BACKGROUND: The vitamin D receptor (VDR) has been studied as a novel target for cancer therapy in many tissue types as VDR ligands decrease cell proliferation in vitro and decrease tumor growth in vivo in sensitive cells. The objective of this study was to analyze the response to VDR agonist therapy in a panel of validated thyroid cancer cells and assess genetic markers predicting sensitivity and resistance to calcitriol and the noncalcemic analog DP006. METHODS:Thyroid cancer cell lines were analyzed for VDR and RXR protein by Western blot. Cell growth after VDR agonist treatment (calcitriol or DP006) was assessed after 6 days of treatment by viable cell assay. To investigate calcitriol/DP006 resistance in VDR-expressing cells, the VDR was sequenced and 1-α and 24-hydroxylase mRNA expression was assessed. RESULTS:VDR protein was variably expressed in the thyroid cancer cell lines and its presence was not sufficient for decreased viable cell count in response to calcitriol or DP006. The most sensitive cells (TPC1) have an ff FokI VDR polymorphism and the most resistant cells (HTh7 and 8505C) have an FF FokI VDR. This is a unique finding given that the balance of the literature of VDR polymorphisms describes an association of the ff FokI polymorphism with cancer risk and/or decreased VDR transactivation. 1-α and 24-hydroxylase mRNA expression before and after VDR agonist therapy was examined. 1-α-Hydroxylase levels did not change after calcitriol treatment. However, we found that higher baseline 24-hydroxylase levels and/or lower stimulation of 24-hydroxylase levels after calcitriol treatment were associated with relative resistance to calcitriol/DP006. CONCLUSIONS: The VDR represents a novel therapeutic target in poorly differentiated thyroid cancer; however, the efficacy of VDR agonist therapy to decrease viable thyroid cancer cell count cannot be predicted solely on the presence of the VDR. The FF FokI VDR genotype and high baseline 24-hydroxylase levels were associated with relative resistance to calcitriol and DP006. Therefore, identifiable markers of sensitivity or resistance to VDR agonist therapy may allow for a personalized use of these agents in poorly differentiated thyroid cancer.
Authors: D G Albertson; B Ylstra; R Segraves; C Collins; S H Dairkee; D Kowbel; W L Kuo; J W Gray; D Pinkel Journal: Nat Genet Date: 2000-06 Impact factor: 38.330
Authors: Yingyu Ma; Wei-Dong Yu; Pamela A Hershberger; Geraldine Flynn; Rui-Xian Kong; Donald L Trump; Candace S Johnson Journal: Mol Cancer Ther Date: 2008-09 Impact factor: 6.261
Authors: Shelley S Tworoger; Margaret A Gates; Margaret A Gate; I-Min Lee; Julie E Buring; Linda Titus-Ernstoff; Daniel Cramer; Susan E Hankinson Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2009-02-17 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Angie L Bookout; Yangsik Jeong; Michael Downes; Ruth T Yu; Ronald M Evans; David J Mangelsdorf Journal: Cell Date: 2006-08-25 Impact factor: 41.582
Authors: Robert G Bennett; Shannon E Wakeley; Frederick G Hamel; Robin R High; Christopher Korch; Whitney S Goldner Journal: Oncology Date: 2012-09-05 Impact factor: 2.935
Authors: M P Yavropoulou; G Panagiotou; K Topouridou; G Karayannopoulou; T Koletsa; T Zarampoukas; A Goropoulos; E Chatzaki; J G Yovos; K Pazaitou-Panayiotou Journal: J Endocrinol Invest Date: 2017-06-06 Impact factor: 4.256
Authors: Marissa Penna-Martinez; Elizabeth Ramos-Lopez; Julienne Stern; Heinrich Kahles; Nora Hinsch; Martin-Leo Hansmann; Ivan Selkinski; Frank Grünwald; Christian Vorländer; Wolf O Bechstein; Stefan Zeuzem; Katharina Holzer; Klaus Badenhoop Journal: Thyroid Date: 2012-06-12 Impact factor: 6.568
Authors: Andra-Maria Cocolos; Andrei Muresan; Andra Caragheorgheopol; Mircea Ghemigian; Dumitru Ioachim; Catalina Poiana Journal: In Vivo Date: 2022 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 2.406
Authors: B Balla; B Tobiás; J P Kósa; J Podani; P Horváth; Z Nagy; J Horányi; B Járay; E Székely; L Krenács; K Árvai; M Dank; Z Putz; B Szabó; B Szili; Z Valkusz; B Vasas; G Győri; P Lakatos; I Takács Journal: J Endocrinol Invest Date: 2014-09-09 Impact factor: 4.256
Authors: Audrey H Poon; Li Gong; Charlotte Brasch-Andersen; Augusto A Litonjua; Benjamin A Raby; Qutayba Hamid; Catherine Laprise; Scott T Weiss; Russ B Altman; Teri E Klein Journal: Pharmacogenet Genomics Date: 2012-10 Impact factor: 2.089
Authors: Grégoire B Morand; Sabrina Daniela da Silva; Michael P Hier; Moulay A Alaoui-Jamali Journal: Front Oncol Date: 2014-11-04 Impact factor: 6.244
Authors: June Young Choi; Jin Wook Yi; Jun Hyup Lee; Ra-Yeong Song; Hyeongwon Yu; Hyungju Kwon; Young Jun Chai; Su-Jin Kim; Kyu Eun Lee Journal: Endocr Connect Date: 2017-02-21 Impact factor: 3.335