Literature DB >> 20857280

Peripherally inserted central venous catheters and central venous catheters related thrombosis in post-critical patients.

Manuela Bonizzoli1, Stefano Batacchi, Giovanni Cianchi, Giovanni Zagli, Francesco Lapi, Valentina Tucci, Giacomo Martini, Simona Di Valvasone, Adriano Peris.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Peripherally inserted central venous catheters (PICC) have been proposed as an alternative to central venous catheters (CVC). The aim of this study was to determine the thrombosis rate in relation to PICC placement in patients discharged from the intensive care unit (ICU).
METHODS: Data of patients admitted to the ICU (Careggi Teaching Hospital, Florence, Italy; January-August 2008) and discharged with a central venous device were sequentially studied. During the first 4 months, CVCs were used (CVC group), whereas during the last 4 months, PICCs were used (PICC group). Demographic/clinical and catheter-related data were collected. Intensivists performed Doppler examination at ICU discharge and 7, 15, and 30 days after placement.
RESULTS: Data of 239 patients were analyzed (125 of CVC group, 114 of PICC group). A total of 2,747 CVC-days and 4,024 PICC-days of observation were included. Patient characteristics were comparable between groups. Patients with PICC had a significantly higher incidence rate of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) than patients with CVC (27.2 vs. 9.6%, P = 0.0012). The rate of DVT/1,000 catheter days was 4.4 for CVCs and 7.7 for PICCs. Eighty percent of DVTs occurred within 2 weeks after insertion. Binary logistic analysis showed a two-fold increased risk for women and a three-fold increased risk when using the left basilic vein in the PICC group.
CONCLUSIONS: In our post-critically ill population, PICCs were associated with a higher rate of DVT complications than CVCs. Routine ultrasound surveillance for the first 2 weeks after patient discharge from the ICU with a PICC and preferential use of CVC for these patients may be warranted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20857280     DOI: 10.1007/s00134-010-2043-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Intensive Care Med        ISSN: 0342-4642            Impact factor:   17.440


  12 in total

1.  Venous thrombosis associated with the placement of peripherally inserted central catheters.

Authors:  A W Allen; J L Megargell; D B Brown; F C Lynch; H Singh; Y Singh; P N Waybill
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2000 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.464

2.  A review of an anaesthetic led vascular access list.

Authors:  S Galloway; A Sharma; J Ward; A R Bodenham
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 6.955

Review 3.  Upper extremity venous Doppler ultrasound.

Authors:  Therese M Weber; Mark E Lockhart; Michelle L Robbin
Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 2.303

Review 4.  Management of venous port systems in oncology: a review of current evidence.

Authors:  S Vescia; A K Baumgärtner; V R Jacobs; M Kiechle-Bahat; A Rody; S Loibl; N Harbeck
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2007-09-09       Impact factor: 32.976

Review 5.  Peripherally inserted central venous catheters are not superior to central venous catheters in the acute care of surgical patients on the ward.

Authors:  Simon Turcotte; Serge Dubé; Gilles Beauchamp
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Incidence of central vein stenosis and occlusion following upper extremity PICC and port placement.

Authors:  Carin F Gonsalves; David J Eschelman; Kevin L Sullivan; Nancy DuBois; Joseph Bonn
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  2003-03-06       Impact factor: 2.740

7.  Guidelines for the prevention of intravascular catheter-related infections. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Authors:  Naomi P O'Grady; Mary Alexander; E Patchen Dellinger; Julie L Gerberding; Stephen O Heard; Dennis G Maki; Henry Masur; Rita D McCormick; Leonard A Mermel; Michele L Pearson; Issam I Raad; Adrienne Randolph; Robert A Weinstein
Journal:  MMWR Recomm Rep       Date:  2002-08-09

8.  The incidence of PICC line-associated thrombosis with and without the use of prophylactic anticoagulants.

Authors:  James D Paauw; Heather Borders; Nichole Ingalls; Sarah Boomstra; Susan Lambke; Brian Fedeson; Austin Goldsmith; Alan T Davis
Journal:  JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr       Date:  2008 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.016

Review 9.  Post-thrombotic syndrome: prevalence, prognostication and need for progress.

Authors:  Paolo Prandoni; Susan R Kahn
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  2009-02-13       Impact factor: 6.998

Review 10.  PICCing the best access for your patient.

Authors:  Mohammed Tariq; David T Huang
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 9.097

View more
  26 in total

1.  Risk factors associated with peripherally inserted central venous catheter-related large vein thrombosis in neurological intensive care patients.

Authors:  Thomas J Wilson; Devin L Brown; William J Meurer; William R Stetler; D Andrew Wilkinson; Jeffrey J Fletcher
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2011-11-24       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 2.  Focus on peripherally inserted central catheters in critically ill patients.

Authors:  Paolo Cotogni; Mauro Pittiruti
Journal:  World J Crit Care Med       Date:  2014-11-04

3.  Catheter-related thrombosis: A practical approach.

Authors:  Caroline Wall; John Moore; Jecko Thachil
Journal:  J Intensive Care Soc       Date:  2015-12-03

4.  Impact of postplacement adjustment of peripherally inserted central catheters on the risk of bloodstream infection and venous thrombus formation.

Authors:  Sanjiv M Baxi; Emily K Shuman; Christy A Scipione; Benrong Chen; Aditi Sharma; Jennifer J K Rasanathan; Carol E Chenoweth
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  2013-06-18       Impact factor: 3.254

5.  The clinical significance of peripherally inserted central venous catheter-related deep vein thrombosis.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Fletcher; William Stetler; Thomas J Wilson
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 3.210

6.  Peripherally inserted central venous catheter safety in burn care: a single-center retrospective cohort review.

Authors:  Ryan E Austin; Shahriar Shahrokhi; Siavash Bolourani; Marc G Jeschke
Journal:  J Burn Care Res       Date:  2015 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.845

Review 7.  Thrombosis in cancer patients: etiology, incidence, and management.

Authors:  Rahul A Sheth; Andrew Niekamp; Keith B Quencer; Fadi Shamoun; Martha-Gracia Knuttinen; Sailendra Naidu; Rahmi Oklu
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2017-12

Review 8.  Central venous catheter-related thrombosis and thromboprophylaxis in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  E Vidal; A Sharathkumar; J Glover; E V S Faustino
Journal:  J Thromb Haemost       Date:  2014-06-19       Impact factor: 5.824

9.  Increased risk of symptomatic upper-extremity venous thrombosis with multiple peripherally inserted central catheter insertions in pediatric patients.

Authors:  Ralph Gnannt; Nicolas Waespe; Michael Temple; Afsaneh Amirabadi; Kuan Liu; Leonardo R Brandão; Bairbre L Connolly
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2018-02-27

10.  A Randomized Trial of Central Venous Catheter Type and Thrombosis in Critically Ill Neurologic Patients.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Fletcher; Thomas J Wilson; Venkatakrishna Rajajee; William R Stetler; Teresa L Jacobs; Kyle M Sheehan; Devin L Brown
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 3.210

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.