Literature DB >> 12616419

Incidence of central vein stenosis and occlusion following upper extremity PICC and port placement.

Carin F Gonsalves1, David J Eschelman, Kevin L Sullivan, Nancy DuBois, Joseph Bonn.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence of central vein stenosis and occlusion following upper extremity placement of peripherally inserted central venous catheters (PICCs) and venous ports. One hundred fifty-four patients who underwent venography of the ipsilateral central veins prior to initial and subsequent venous access device insertion were retrospectively identified. All follow-up venograms were interpreted at the time of catheter placement by one interventional radiologist over a 5-year period and compared to the findings on initial venography. For patients with central vein abnormalities, hospital and home infusion service records and radiology reports were reviewed to determine catheter dwell time and potential alternative etiologies of central vein stenosis or occlusion. The effect of catheter caliber and dwell time on development of central vein abnormalities was evaluated. Venography performed prior to initial catheter placement showed that 150 patients had normal central veins. Three patients had central vein stenosis, and one had central vein occlusion. Subsequent venograms (n = 154) at the time of additional venous access device placement demonstrated 8 patients with occlusions and 10 with stenoses. Three of the 18 patients with abnormal follow-up venograms were found to have potential alternative causes of central vein abnormalities. Excluding these 3 patients and the 4 patients with abnormal initial venograms, a 7% incidence of central vein stenosis or occlusion was found in patients with prior indwelling catheters and normal initial venograms. Catheter caliber showed no effect on the subsequent development of central vein abnormalities. Patients who developed new or worsened central vein stenosis or occlusion had significantly (p = 0.03) longer catheter dwell times than patients without central vein abnormalities. New central vein stenosis or occlusion occurred in 7% of patients following upper arm placement of venous access devices. Patients with longer catheter dwell time were more likely to develop central vein abnormalities. In order to preserve vascular access for dialysis fistulae and grafts and adhere to Dialysis Outcomes Quality Initiative guidelines, alternative venous access sites should be considered for patients with chronic renal insufficiency and end-stage renal disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12616419     DOI: 10.1007/s00270-002-2628-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol        ISSN: 0174-1551            Impact factor:   2.740


  26 in total

1.  Fibrin sheath angioplasty: a technique to prevent superior vena cava stenosis secondary to dialysis catheters.

Authors:  Robert I Hacker; Lorena De Marco Garcia; Ankur Chawla; Thomas F Panetta
Journal:  Int J Angiol       Date:  2012-09

Review 2.  Pediatric vascular access.

Authors:  James S Donaldson
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2006-03-15

3.  Arm port implantation in cancer patients.

Authors:  Pierre-Yves Marcy; Andrea Figl; Nicolas Amoretti; Antoine Ianessi
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-03-02       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  Association between prior peripherally inserted central catheters and lack of functioning arteriovenous fistulas: a case-control study in hemodialysis patients.

Authors:  Mireille El Ters; Gregory J Schears; Sandra J Taler; Amy W Williams; Robert C Albright; Bernice M Jenson; Amy L Mahon; Andrew H Stockland; Sanjay Misra; Scott L Nyberg; Andrew D Rule; Marie C Hogan
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2012-06-15       Impact factor: 8.860

5.  High-flow hemodialysis arteriovenous shunt with concurrent central vein stenosis masquerading as sigmoid sinus dural arteriovenous fistula.

Authors:  C-F Chen; S-W Hsu; S-F Ko; K-Y Chen
Journal:  Clin Neuroradiol       Date:  2011-12-04       Impact factor: 3.649

6.  Patterns and Predictors of Short-Term Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter Use: A Multicenter Prospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  David Paje; Anna Conlon; Scott Kaatz; Lakshmi Swaminathan; Tanya Boldenow; Steven J Bernstein; Scott A Flanders; Vineet Chopra
Journal:  J Hosp Med       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 2.960

7.  Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters and Hemodialysis Outcomes.

Authors:  Rita L McGill; Robin Ruthazer; Klemens B Meyer; Dana C Miskulin; Daniel E Weiner
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2016-06-23       Impact factor: 8.237

8.  Neurologic and ophthalmologic complications of vascular access in a hemodialysis patient.

Authors:  Roxana Cleper; Nitza Goldenberg-Cohen; Liora Kornreich; Irit Krause; Miriam Davidovits
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2007-05-09       Impact factor: 3.714

9.  Peripherally inserted central catheters and other intravascular devices: how safe are they for hemodialysis patients?

Authors:  Roman Shingarev; Michael Allon
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 8.860

10.  Upper extremity arteriovenous dialysis fistula resulting in cavernous sinus arterialized blood flow.

Authors:  R R Watson; C Russo
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2007 Jun-Jul       Impact factor: 3.825

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.