| Literature DB >> 20856858 |
Oleg Mediannikov1, Georges Diatta, Florence Fenollar, Cheikh Sokhna, Jean-François Trape, Didier Raoult.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Rickettsioses are one of the most important causes of systemic febrile illness among travelers from developed countries, but little is known about their incidence in indigenous populations, especially in West Africa. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPALEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2010 PMID: 20856858 PMCID: PMC2939048 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0000821
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS Negl Trop Dis ISSN: 1935-2727
Figure 1Map of Africa showing the countries where serological studies for SFG rickettsioses were performed before our study.
The numbers on the map indicate seroprevalence in %. The diagram represents relative seroprevalence in different countries and reference [in square brackets].
Geographic coordinates of tick collection sites.
| Region | Village | Coordinates |
| Sine-Saloum | Dielmo | 13°43′N;16°24′W |
| Ndiop | 13°41′N;16°22′W | |
| Medina | 13°42′N;16°24′W | |
| Passi | 13°42′N;16°23′W | |
| Niakhar | Ngangarlame | 14°34′N-16°29′W |
| Poudaye | 14°32′N-16°28′W | |
| Toucar | 14°32′N-16°28′W | |
| Poultok Diohine | 14°31′N-16°29′W | |
| Ngonine | 14°34′N-16°31′W | |
| Logdir | 14°29′N-16°29′W | |
| Ngayokheme | 14°31′N-16°26′W | |
| Diokoul | 14°29′N-16°26′W | |
| Sob | 14°29′N-16°26′W | |
| Diohine | 14°30′N-16°30′W | |
| Kalom | 14°31′N-16°25′W | |
| Sass-Ndiafadji | 14°30′N-16°24′W | |
| Mboyene | 14°31′N-16°27′W | |
| Ngan-Fissel | 14°30′N-16°26′W | |
| Ngardiame | 14°29′N-16°27′W | |
| Ngonine | 14°34′N-16°31′W |
Figure 2Map of Senegal with indicated locations of tick collection, species of ticks and a quantity collected.
Results of serological screening of the generally healthy population of two villages (Dielmo and Ndiop) of the Sine-Saloum region of Senegal.
| Dielmo | Ndiop | P value | ||||||
| Population screened, number of participants | ||||||||
| 238 | 241 | |||||||
| Positive with at least one SFG rickettsial antigen at titer of | ||||||||
| 51 (21.4%) | 123 (51%) | <10−3 | ||||||
| Age | No. of positives | % among screened of the same age | % among positives | Age | No. of positives | % among screened of the same age | % among positives | |
| 3–5 | 3 | 33.3 | 5.9 | 3–5 | 4 | 66.7 | 3.3 | |
| 6–10 | 11 | 25.6 | 21.6 | 6–10 | 26 | 57.8 | 21.1 | |
| 11–15 | 6 | 13.3 | 11.8 | 11–15 | 23 | 59.0 | 18.7 | |
| 16–20 | 4 | 14.3 | 7.8 | 16–20 | 22 | 52.4 | 17.9 | |
| 21–40 | 8 | 14. | 15.7 | 21–40 | 27 | 43.5 | 22.0 | |
| >40 | 19 | 33.9 | 37.3 | >40 | 21 | 44.7 | 17.1 | |
| Positive with | ||||||||
| 6 (2.4%) | 7 (2.9%) | 0.8 | ||||||
| Positive with | ||||||||
| 49 (20.6%; 96%) | 110 (45.6%; 89%) | <10−3 (0.1) | ||||||
| Positive with | ||||||||
| 35 (14.7%; 68.6%) | 93 (35.6%; 75.6%) | <10−3 (0.3) | ||||||
| Positive with at least one SFG rickettsial antigen at titer of higher than 1/50, number (% of screened; % of overall positive with rickettsial antigens) | ||||||||
| 3 (1.3%; 5.9%) | 15 (6.2%; 12%) | 0.004 (0.2) | ||||||
Tick species collected in Senegal and studied for SFG rickettsiae.
| Species | Collected | Positive for rickettsiae: number (%) | Species of rickettsial identified | Animals from which positive ticks were collected | ||
|
| ||||||
|
| 40 | 0 | - | - | ||
|
| 115 | 60 (51.3%) |
| Cows, donkeys, sheep, goats, horses | ||
|
| 67 | 4 (6%) |
| Cows, donkeys, sheep, goats, horses | ||
|
| 2090 | 14 (0.7%) 10 (0.5%) |
| Cows, donkeys, sheep, goats, horses | ||
|
| 49 | 11 (22.4%) |
| Predominantly donkeys (9), cows (2) | ||
|
| ||||||
| In total in region | Dielmo | Ndiop | ||||
|
| 5 | 1 (20%) | 0/1 (0%) | 0/2 (0%) |
| Cow |
|
| 58 | 26 (44.8%) | 0/2 (0%) | 19/43 (44%) |
| Cows, donkeys, sheep, goats, horses |
|
| 74 | 5 (6.8%) | 1/25 (4%) | 1/30 (3%) |
| Cows, donkeys, sheep, goats, horses |
| 10 (13.5%) | 5/25 (20%) | 3/30 (10%) |
| Cows, donkeys, sheep, goats, horses | ||
|
| 268 | 1 (0.4%) | 0/21 (0%) | 0/151 (0%) |
| Horse |
| 1 (0.4%) | 0/21 (0%) | 1/151 (0,7%) |
| Sheep | ||
|
| 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | - |
Separate columns represent data for two villages in the Sine-Saloum region (Dielmo and Ndiop) where serological and molecular studies in humans were performed.
Figure 3Photos of ticks studied with indication of rickettsiae found by PCR.
Figure 4Phylogenetic tree based on aligned complete sequences of gltA gene and constructed by neighbor-joining method. Numbers in nodes represent bootstrap values.
The tree shows the position of isolates and amplicons from ticks collected in Senegal.
Clinical and epidemiological characteristics of spotted fevers caused by rickettsiae found in this study.
| Species | Disease | Tick species associated (literature data) | Tick species associated (present study) | Fever, % | Diffuse rash, % | Eschar, % | Lymphadenopathy | Lymphangitis | Reported mortality rates,% |
|
| Mediterranean spotted fever |
|
| 100 | 97 | 72 | Rare | No | 1–5 |
|
| African tick-bite fever |
|
| 92 | 43 | 98%, often multiple | Yes | No | Very low |
|
| Lymphangitis-associated rickettsiosis |
|
| 100 | 78 | 89% | 55% | Yes, up to 44% | 0 |
|
| Unnamed |
|
| Yes | Yes | Yes | ? | ? | 0 |
|
| Unnamed (one case) |
|
| Yes | Yes | Yes | ? | ? | 0 |
Selected literature data on serological cross-protection among different spotted fever group rickettsiae in animal models.
| Compared rickettsiae | Animal model | Antigen | Results of the study | Reference |
|
| Guinea pigs | Sublethal doses alive rickettsiae | Absence of cross-immunity |
|
| Guinea pigs | Sublethal doses alive rickettsiae | Reciprocal cross-protection |
| |
|
| Guinea pigs | Sublethal doses alive rickettsiae | Reciprocal cross-protection |
|
|
| Guinea pigs | Sublethal doses alive rickettsiae | Absence of cross-immunity |
|
|
| Guinea pigs | Sublethal doses alive rickettsiae | Reciprocal cross-protection |
|
|
| Guinea pigs | Sublethal doses alive rickettsiae | Absence of cross-immunity |
|
|
| Guinea pigs | Sublethal doses alive rickettsiae | Reciprocal cross-protection |
|