BACKGROUND: Systolic blood pressure and pulse pressure are substantially higher in older adults. The relative contributions of increased forward versus reflected pressure wave amplitude or earlier arrival of the reflected wave to elevated pulse pressure remain controversial. METHODS AND RESULTS: We measured proximal aortic pressure and flow, forward pressure wave amplitude, global wave reflection, reflected wave timing, and pulse wave velocity noninvasively in 6417 (age range, 19 to 90 years; 53 women) Framingham Heart Study Third Generation and Offspring participants. Variation in forward wave amplitude paralleled pulse pressure throughout adulthood. In contrast, wave reflection and pulse pressure were divergent across adulthood: In younger participants, pulse pressure was lower and wave reflection was higher with advancing age, whereas in older participants, pulse pressure was higher and wave reflection was lower with age. Reflected wave timing differed modestly across age groups despite considerable differences in pulse wave velocity. Forward wave amplitude explained 80 (central) and 66 (peripheral) of the variance in pulse pressure in younger participants (<50 years) and 90 and 84 in the older participants (≥ 50 years; all P<0.0001). In a stepwise model that evaluated age-pulse pressure relations in the full sample, the late accelerated increases in central and peripheral pulse pressure were markedly attenuated when variation in forward wave amplitude was considered. CONCLUSIONS: Higher pulse pressure at any age and higher pulse pressure with advancing age is associated predominantly with a larger forward pressure wave. The influence of wave reflection on age-related differences in pulse pressure was minor.
BACKGROUND: Systolic blood pressure and pulse pressure are substantially higher in older adults. The relative contributions of increased forward versus reflected pressure wave amplitude or earlier arrival of the reflected wave to elevated pulse pressure remain controversial. METHODS AND RESULTS: We measured proximal aortic pressure and flow, forward pressure wave amplitude, global wave reflection, reflected wave timing, and pulse wave velocity noninvasively in 6417 (age range, 19 to 90 years; 53 women) Framingham Heart Study Third Generation and Offspring participants. Variation in forward wave amplitude paralleled pulse pressure throughout adulthood. In contrast, wave reflection and pulse pressure were divergent across adulthood: In younger participants, pulse pressure was lower and wave reflection was higher with advancing age, whereas in older participants, pulse pressure was higher and wave reflection was lower with age. Reflected wave timing differed modestly across age groups despite considerable differences in pulse wave velocity. Forward wave amplitude explained 80 (central) and 66 (peripheral) of the variance in pulse pressure in younger participants (<50 years) and 90 and 84 in the older participants (≥ 50 years; all P<0.0001). In a stepwise model that evaluated age-pulse pressure relations in the full sample, the late accelerated increases in central and peripheral pulse pressure were markedly attenuated when variation in forward wave amplitude was considered. CONCLUSIONS: Higher pulse pressure at any age and higher pulse pressure with advancing age is associated predominantly with a larger forward pressure wave. The influence of wave reflection on age-related differences in pulse pressure was minor.
Authors: Francis Verbeke; Patrick Segers; Steven Heireman; Raymond Vanholder; Pascal Verdonck; Luc M Van Bortel Journal: Hypertension Date: 2005-05-23 Impact factor: 10.190
Authors: Greta Lee Splansky; Diane Corey; Qiong Yang; Larry D Atwood; L Adrienne Cupples; Emelia J Benjamin; Ralph B D'Agostino; Caroline S Fox; Martin G Larson; Joanne M Murabito; Christopher J O'Donnell; Ramachandran S Vasan; Philip A Wolf; Daniel Levy Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2007-03-19 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Patrick Segers; Ernst R Rietzschel; Marc L De Buyzere; Sebastian J Vermeersch; Dirk De Bacquer; Luc M Van Bortel; Guy De Backer; Thierry C Gillebert; Pascal R Verdonck Journal: Hypertension Date: 2007-04-02 Impact factor: 10.190
Authors: Aram V Chobanian; George L Bakris; Henry R Black; William C Cushman; Lee A Green; Joseph L Izzo; Daniel W Jones; Barry J Materson; Suzanne Oparil; Jackson T Wright; Edward J Roccella Journal: Hypertension Date: 2003-12-01 Impact factor: 10.190
Authors: Carmel M McEniery; Barry McDonnell; Margaret Munnery; Sharon M Wallace; Chloe V Rowe; John R Cockcroft; Ian B Wilkinson Journal: Hypertension Date: 2008-04-21 Impact factor: 10.190
Authors: Gary F Mitchell; Helen Parise; Emelia J Benjamin; Martin G Larson; Michelle J Keyes; Joseph A Vita; Ramachandran S Vasan; Daniel Levy Journal: Hypertension Date: 2004-05-03 Impact factor: 10.190
Authors: Gary F Mitchell; Mark A van Buchem; Sigurdur Sigurdsson; John D Gotal; Maria K Jonsdottir; Ólafur Kjartansson; Melissa Garcia; Thor Aspelund; Tamara B Harris; Vilmundur Gudnason; Lenore J Launer Journal: Brain Date: 2011-11 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: Alyssa Torjesen; Leroy L Cooper; Jian Rong; Martin G Larson; Naomi M Hamburg; Daniel Levy; Emelia J Benjamin; Ramachandran S Vasan; Gary F Mitchell Journal: Hypertension Date: 2017-04 Impact factor: 10.190