Literature DB >> 2085558

Computer-assisted analysis of transrectal ultrasound images.

B L Craine1, G Oldani, J R Engel, R F Whitney, D Wright, E R Craine.   

Abstract

We have developed a microcomputer based system with an application specific software package which permits the direct digitization and analysis of transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) images. The system is highly flexible and enables access to a wide range of image analysis tools through relatively simple software modifications, which cannot be implemented using a standard ultrasound instrument. We have demonstrated the capability of the system by an analysis of a number of morphometric parameters and by a correlation of these measurements with the presence of prostatic cancer. We found that the measurement of the ratio of the anterior-posterior axis to transverse axis and the presumed circular area ratio (PCAR) were significant predictors of prostatic cancer. The sensitivity of the PCAR measurement was 93%, the specificity was 50%, the positive predictive value was 57%, and the negative predictive value was 91%. The high negative predictive values of these parameters may provide objective criteria to allow for selective biopsy of patients. This system provides researchers with an efficient, economical, and flexible method to aid in the analysis of TRUS images in a quantitative manner.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2085558     DOI: 10.1007/BF03168118

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Digit Imaging        ISSN: 0897-1889            Impact factor:   4.056


  9 in total

1.  Latent Carcinoma of the Prostate.

Authors:  G S Andrews
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1949-08       Impact factor: 3.411

2.  Quantitative analysis of ultrasonogram of the prostate.

Authors:  A Kimura; S Nakamura; M Niizuma; T Hoshino; T Niijima; Y Ohashi; T Higuchi
Journal:  J Clin Ultrasound       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 0.910

3.  Transrectal ultrasound for staging prior to radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  S W Hardeman; J Q Causey; D P Hickey; M S Soloway
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 2.649

4.  The use of relative operating characteristic (ROC) curves in test performance evaluation.

Authors:  J R Beck; E K Shultz
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 5.534

5.  Regional morphology and pathology of the prostate.

Authors:  J E McNeal
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  1968-03       Impact factor: 2.493

6.  Transrectal ultrasonotomography of the prostate.

Authors:  H Watanabe; D Igari; Y Tanahashi; K Harada; M Saitoh
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1975-11       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Relative value of prostate-specific antigen and prostatic acid phosphatase in diagnosis and management of adenocarcinoma of prostate. Ohio State University experience.

Authors:  J R Drago; R A Badalament; M G Wientjes; J J Smith; J A Nesbitt; J P York; J J Ashton; J C Neff
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 2.649

8.  Relative reliability of five serially measured markers for prognosis of progression in prostate cancer.

Authors:  C S Killian; L J Emrich; F P Vargas; N Yang; M C Wang; R L Priore; G P Murphy; T M Chu
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 13.506

9.  Prostate cancer: comparison of transrectal US and digital rectal examination for screening.

Authors:  F Lee; P J Littrup; S T Torp-Pedersen; C Mettlin; T A McHugh; J M Gray; G H Kumasaka; R D McLeary
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 11.105

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.