OBJECTIVE: To examine the relationships of race, sex, adiposity, adipokines, and physical activity to telomere length in adolescents. STUDY DESIGN: Leukocyte telomere length (T/S ratio) was assessed cross-sectionally in 667 adolescents (aged 14-18 years; 48% African-Americans; 51% girls) using a quantitative polymerase chain reaction method. Generalized estimating equations analyses were performed. RESULTS: Telomere length was greater in the African-American adolescents than in the Caucasian adolescents (age- and sex-adjusted T/S ratio ± SE, 1.32 ± 0.01 vs 1.27 ± 0.01: P = .014) and greater in girls than in boys (age- and race-adjusted T/S ratio ± SE, 1.31 ± 0.01 vs 1.27 ± 0.01; P = .007). None of the adiposity or adipokine measures explained a significant proportion of the variance in telomere length. Vigorous physical activity was positively associated with telomere length (adjusted R(2) = 0.019; P = .009) and accounted for 1.9% of the total variance only in girls. CONCLUSIONS: This study, conducted in a biracial adolescent cohort, demonstrated that (1) race and sex differences in telomere length have already emerged during adolescence; (2) adiposity and adipokines are not associated with telomere length at this age; and (3) the antiaging effect of vigorous physical activity may begin in youth, especially in girls.
OBJECTIVE: To examine the relationships of race, sex, adiposity, adipokines, and physical activity to telomere length in adolescents. STUDY DESIGN: Leukocyte telomere length (T/S ratio) was assessed cross-sectionally in 667 adolescents (aged 14-18 years; 48% African-Americans; 51% girls) using a quantitative polymerase chain reaction method. Generalized estimating equations analyses were performed. RESULTS: Telomere length was greater in the African-American adolescents than in the Caucasian adolescents (age- and sex-adjusted T/S ratio ± SE, 1.32 ± 0.01 vs 1.27 ± 0.01: P = .014) and greater in girls than in boys (age- and race-adjusted T/S ratio ± SE, 1.31 ± 0.01 vs 1.27 ± 0.01; P = .007). None of the adiposity or adipokine measures explained a significant proportion of the variance in telomere length. Vigorous physical activity was positively associated with telomere length (adjusted R(2) = 0.019; P = .009) and accounted for 1.9% of the total variance only in girls. CONCLUSIONS: This study, conducted in a biracial adolescent cohort, demonstrated that (1) race and sex differences in telomere length have already emerged during adolescence; (2) adiposity and adipokines are not associated with telomere length at this age; and (3) the antiaging effect of vigorous physical activity may begin in youth, especially in girls.
Authors: O S Al-Attas; N Al-Daghri; A Bamakhramah; S Shaun Sabico; P McTernan; T T-K Huang Journal: Acta Paediatr Date: 2010-02-24 Impact factor: 2.299
Authors: S Misiti; S Nanni; G Fontemaggi; Y S Cong; J Wen; H W Hirte; G Piaggio; A Sacchi; A Pontecorvi; S Bacchetti; A Farsetti Journal: Mol Cell Biol Date: 2000-06 Impact factor: 4.272
Authors: Aedín Cassidy; Immaculata De Vivo; Yan Liu; Jiali Han; Jennifer Prescott; David J Hunter; Eric B Rimm Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2010-03-10 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Daniel Levy; Susan L Neuhausen; Steven C Hunt; Masayuki Kimura; Shih-Jen Hwang; Wei Chen; Joshua C Bis; Annette L Fitzpatrick; Erin Smith; Andrew D Johnson; Jeffrey P Gardner; Sathanur R Srinivasan; Nicholas Schork; Jerome I Rotter; Utz Herbig; Bruce M Psaty; Malinee Sastrasinh; Sarah S Murray; Ramachandran S Vasan; Michael A Province; Nicole L Glazer; Xiaobin Lu; Xiaojian Cao; Richard Kronmal; Massimo Mangino; Nicole Soranzo; Tim D Spector; Gerald S Berenson; Abraham Aviv Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2010-04-26 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Veryan Codd; Massimo Mangino; Pim van der Harst; Peter S Braund; Michael Kaiser; Alan J Beveridge; Suzanne Rafelt; Jasbir Moore; Chris Nelson; Nicole Soranzo; Guangju Zhai; Ana M Valdes; Hannah Blackburn; Irene Mateo Leach; Rudolf A de Boer; Masayuki Kimura; Abraham Aviv; Alison H Goodall; Willem Ouwehand; Dirk J van Veldhuisen; Wiek H van Gilst; Gerjan Navis; Paul R Burton; Martin D Tobin; Alistair S Hall; John R Thompson; Tim Spector; Nilesh J Samani Journal: Nat Genet Date: 2010-02-07 Impact factor: 38.330
Authors: Kathryn L Terry; Shelley S Tworoger; Allison F Vitonis; Jason Wong; Linda Titus-Ernstoff; Immaculata De Vivo; Daniel W Cramer Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2012-01-20 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Mengmeng Du; Jennifer Prescott; Peter Kraft; Jiali Han; Edward Giovannucci; Susan E Hankinson; Immaculata De Vivo Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2012-02-01 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Marissa Rewak; Stephen Buka; Jennifer Prescott; Immaculata De Vivo; Eric B Loucks; Ichiro Kawachi; Amy L Non; Laura D Kubzansky Journal: Biol Psychol Date: 2014-03-29 Impact factor: 3.251
Authors: Daniel K Leibel; Danielle Shaked; Danielle L Beatty Moody; Hans B Liu; Nan-Ping Weng; Michele K Evans; Alan B Zonderman; Shari R Waldstein Journal: Neuropsychology Date: 2019-10-14 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Naomi M Simon; Zandra E Walton; Eric Bui; Jennifer Prescott; Elizabeth Hoge; Aparna Keshaviah; Noah Schwarz; Taylor Dryman; Rebecca A Ojserkis; Benjamin Kovachy; David Mischoulon; John Worthington; Immaculata De Vivo; Maurizio Fava; Kwok-Kin Wong Journal: Psychoneuroendocrinology Date: 2015-04-13 Impact factor: 4.905
Authors: David H Chae; Amani M Nuru-Jeter; Nancy E Adler; Gene H Brody; Jue Lin; Elizabeth H Blackburn; Elissa S Epel Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2014-02 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Stacy S Drury; Emily Mabile; Zoë H Brett; Kyle Esteves; Edward Jones; Elizabeth A Shirtcliff; Katherine P Theall Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2014-06-16 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Hilary J Bethancourt; Mario Kratz; Shirley A A Beresford; M Geoffrey Hayes; Christopher W Kuzawa; Paulita L Duazo; Judith B Borja; Daniel T A Eisenberg Journal: Eur J Nutr Date: 2015-10-26 Impact factor: 5.614