Literature DB >> 20854927

Strategies in case of positive in vivo results in genotoxicity testing.

Véronique Thybaud1, James T Macgregor, Lutz Müller, Riccardo Crebelli, Kerry Dearfield, George Douglas, Peter B Farmer, Elmar Gocke, Makoto Hayashi, David P Lovell, Werner K Lutz, Daniel Marzin, Martha Moore, Takehiko Nohmi, David H Phillips, Jan Van Benthem.   

Abstract

At the 2009 International Workshop on Genotoxicity Testing in Basel, an expert group gathered to provide guidance on suitable follow-up tests to describe risk when basic in vivo genotoxicity tests have yielded positive results. The working group agreed that non-linear dose-response curves occur in vivo with at least some DNA-reactive agents. Quantitative risk assessment in such cases requires the use of (1) adequate data, i.e., the use of all available data for the selection of reliable in vivo models to be used for quantitative risk assessment, (2) appropriate mathematical models and statistical analysis for characterizing the dose-response relationships and allowing the use of quantitative and dose-response information in the interpretation of results, (3) mode of action (MOA) information for the evaluation and analysis of risk, and (4) reliable assessments of the internal dose across species for deriving acceptable margins of exposure and risk levels. Hence, the elucidation of MOA and understanding of the mechanism underlying the dose-response curve are important components of risk assessment. The group agreed on the need for (i) the development of in vivo assays, especially multi-endpoint, multi-species assays, with emphasis on those applicable to humans, and (ii) consensus about the most appropriate mathematical models and statistical analyses for defining non-linear dose-responses and exposure levels associated with acceptable risk.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20854927     DOI: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2010.09.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mutat Res        ISSN: 0027-5107            Impact factor:   2.433


  3 in total

1.  When pigs fly: immunomagnetic separation facilitates rapid determination of Pig-a mutant frequency by flow cytometric analysis.

Authors:  Stephen D Dertinger; Steven M Bryce; Souk Phonethepswath; Svetlana L Avlasevich
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2011-01-28       Impact factor: 2.433

Review 2.  The various aspects of genetic and epigenetic toxicology: testing methods and clinical applications.

Authors:  Ning Ren; Manar Atyah; Wan-Yong Chen; Chen-Hao Zhou
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2017-05-22       Impact factor: 5.531

Review 3.  Ocular Cell Lines and Genotoxicity Assessment.

Authors:  Eliana B Souto; Joana R Campos; Raquel Da Ana; Carlos Martins-Gomes; Amélia M Silva; Selma B Souto; Massimo Lucarini; Alessandra Durazzo; Antonello Santini
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-03-19       Impact factor: 3.390

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.