Literature DB >> 20854402

Nonclinical influences, beyond diagnosis and severity, on clinical decision making in dermatology: understanding the gap between guidelines and practice.

F M Hajjaj1, M S Salek, M K A Basra, A Y Finlay.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Clinical decision making in dermatology is a complex process and might be influenced by a wide range of nonclinical factors.
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to explore the role of nonclinical influences, beyond diagnosis and severity, on clinical decision making in dermatology.
METHODS: Semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted with 46 clinicians working in departments of dermatology of nine different hospitals in Wales. Interviews were audio-recorded and later transcribed and their contents analysed.
RESULTS: Nonclinical factors influencing patient management decisions in dermatology that were identified related to patients, clinicians and practice characteristics. Patient-related factors included place of residence, socioeconomic circumstances, education and intelligence, ethnicity, age, treatment adherence, expectations from treatment, quality of life, concerns and worries, difficult patients, and family members or friends. Clinician-related factors included time constraints in clinic, clinicians' personal circumstances, relationship with colleagues, and relationship with pharmaceutical companies. Practice-related factors included working in private practice, cost of treatment to the National Health Service (NHS), prescribing bureaucracy, and availability of treatment service in the work place. There was a difference between the consultants' views and those of the other clinicians over the impact of pharmaceutical companies on clinicians' prescribing and the awareness of treatment costs to the NHS. Most of the factors identified could potentially influence the clinicians' decision-making process subconsciously. Some clinicians highlighted that these factors are untaught in the medical curriculum, and are usually ignored in clinical guidelines, and therefore represent a challenge to the practice of evidence-based medicine.
CONCLUSIONS: This study has described one aspect of the reality of medical decision making beyond the conventional evidence-based guidelines approach. Proper understanding of nonclinical influences on decision making is of paramount importance for the best patient-centred treatment outcomes.
© 2010 The Authors. Journal Compilation © 2010 British Association of Dermatologists.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20854402     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2010.09868.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Dermatol        ISSN: 0007-0963            Impact factor:   9.302


  8 in total

1.  Screening high risk individuals for hepatitis B: physician knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs.

Authors:  Temitope Foster; Huiming Hon; Fasiha Kanwal; Steven Han; Brennan Spiegel
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2011-10-15       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  An approach to improve the care of mid-life women through the implementation of a Women's Health Assessment Tool/Clinical Decision Support toolkit.

Authors:  Terry M Silvestrin; Anna W Steenrod; Karin S Coyne; David E Gross; Canan B Esinduy; Angela B Kodsi; Gayle J Slifka; Lucy Abraham; Anna L Araiza; Andrew G Bushmakin; Xuemei Luo
Journal:  Womens Health (Lond)       Date:  2016-08-24

Review 3.  The contribution of health services research to improved dermatologic care.

Authors:  Mary-Margaret Chren
Journal:  J Invest Dermatol       Date:  2011-11-10       Impact factor: 8.551

4.  Understanding clinician influences and patient perspectives on outpatient discharge decisions: a qualitative study.

Authors:  N A Harun; A Y Finlay; V Piguet; S Salek
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-03-06       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  The Ethic of Responsibility: Max Weber's Verstehen and Shared Decision-Making in Patient-Centred Care.

Authors:  Ariane Hanemaayer
Journal:  J Med Humanit       Date:  2021-03

6.  Dermatology relevance to graduates from the Universidade Estadual de Campinas Medical School.

Authors:  Ariel Falbel Lugão; Tânia Alencar de Caldas; Eneida Lazzarini de Castro; Elisabete Monteiro de Aguiar Pereira; Paulo Eduardo Neves Ferreira Velho
Journal:  An Bras Dermatol       Date:  2015 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.896

7.  Strengths and limitations of evidence-based dermatology.

Authors:  Hywel C Williams
Journal:  Indian J Dermatol       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 1.494

8.  General practitioners' accounts of negotiating antibiotic prescribing decisions with patients: a qualitative study on what influences antibiotic prescribing in low, medium and high prescribing practices.

Authors:  Marieke M van der Zande; Melanie Dembinsky; Giovanni Aresi; Tjeerd P van Staa
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2019-12-10       Impact factor: 2.497

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.