AIMS: Although readiness to change (RTC) is cited as a key mechanism underlying drinking behavior change, empirical evidence supporting RTC as a predictor of college drinking has been mixed. Considering methodological limitations of previous studies, the current aim was to conduct a more comprehensive test of longitudinal relationships between readiness to change and college drinking. DESIGN: In this correlational, longitudinal study, we used a series of cross-lagged path analyses to test associations between RTC and college drinking outcomes over a 2-year period. SETTING: Data collection was conducted via online surveys on a university campus in the US Pacific Northwest. PARTICIPANTS: Participants (n = 818; 58% women) were college students who reported at least one heavy-drinking episode in the past month and participated in a randomized controlled trial of personalized normative feedback interventions. MEASUREMENTS: Drinking quantity-frequency items and the Rutgers Alcohol Problem Index assessed drinking outcomes. The Readiness to Change Questionnaire assessed RTC. FINDINGS: For drinking-related problems, the best-fitting model included cross-lagged paths between RTC and subsequent drinking-related problems. For drinking quantity-frequency, best-fitting models also included the cross-lagged paths between drinking quantity-frequency and subsequent RTC. Higher RTC almost uniformly predicted higher subsequent levels of drinking and greater experience of drinking-related problems, and drinking quantity-frequency variables were primarily positive predictors of subsequent RTC. CONCLUSIONS: Contrary to previous assumptions, 'the Readiness to Change Questionnaire' does not appear to be predictive of lower levels of subsequent drinking.
AIMS: Although readiness to change (RTC) is cited as a key mechanism underlying drinking behavior change, empirical evidence supporting RTC as a predictor of college drinking has been mixed. Considering methodological limitations of previous studies, the current aim was to conduct a more comprehensive test of longitudinal relationships between readiness to change and college drinking. DESIGN: In this correlational, longitudinal study, we used a series of cross-lagged path analyses to test associations between RTC and college drinking outcomes over a 2-year period. SETTING: Data collection was conducted via online surveys on a university campus in the US Pacific Northwest. PARTICIPANTS: Participants (n = 818; 58% women) were college students who reported at least one heavy-drinking episode in the past month and participated in a randomized controlled trial of personalized normative feedback interventions. MEASUREMENTS: Drinking quantity-frequency items and the Rutgers Alcohol Problem Index assessed drinking outcomes. The Readiness to Change Questionnaire assessed RTC. FINDINGS: For drinking-related problems, the best-fitting model included cross-lagged paths between RTC and subsequent drinking-related problems. For drinking quantity-frequency, best-fitting models also included the cross-lagged paths between drinking quantity-frequency and subsequent RTC. Higher RTC almost uniformly predicted higher subsequent levels of drinking and greater experience of drinking-related problems, and drinking quantity-frequency variables were primarily positive predictors of subsequent RTC. CONCLUSIONS: Contrary to previous assumptions, 'the Readiness to Change Questionnaire' does not appear to be predictive of lower levels of subsequent drinking.
Authors: Clayton Neighbors; Melissa A Lewis; David C Atkins; Megan M Jensen; Theresa Walter; Nicole Fossos; Christine M Lee; Mary E Larimer Journal: J Consult Clin Psychol Date: 2010-12
Authors: Christian S Hendershot; Susan E Collins; William H George; Tamara L Wall; Denis M McCarthy; Tiebing Liang; Mary E Larimer Journal: Alcohol Clin Exp Res Date: 2009-03-06 Impact factor: 3.455
Authors: John D Clapp; Mark B Reed; Jong W Min; Audrey M Shillington; Julie M Croff; Megan R Holmes; Ryan S Trim Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2009-02-27 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Ronald G Thompson; Jennifer C Elliott; Mei-Chen Hu; Christina Aivadyan; Efrat Aharonovich; Deborah S Hasin Journal: Addict Res Theory Date: 2016-06-21
Authors: Erica N Peters; Robert F Leeman; Lisa M Fucito; Benjamin A Toll; William R Corbin; Stephanie S O'Malley Journal: Addict Behav Date: 2011-12-03 Impact factor: 3.913
Authors: Samuel N Meisel; Jennifer P Read; Sarah Mullin; Kathleen Shyhalla; Craig R Colder; Rina D Eiden; Larry W Hawk; William F Wieczorek Journal: Psychol Addict Behav Date: 2018-10-04
Authors: María Luisa Gutiérrez García; Sara Blasco-Algora; Conrado M Fernández-Rodríguez Journal: World J Gastroenterol Date: 2015-07-28 Impact factor: 5.742