Literature DB >> 12107039

The readiness to change questionnaire in subjects with hazardous alcohol consumption, alcohol misuse and dependence in a general population survey.

Wolfgang Hannöver1, Jochen René Thyrian, Ulfert Hapke, Hans-Jürgen Rumpf, Christian Meyer, Ulrich John.   

Abstract

AIMS: To investigate properties and aspects of validity of the Readiness to Change Questionnaire (RCQ) when applied to hazardous drinking, alcohol-abusing or alcohol-dependent subjects sampled from the general population.
METHODS: In a representative survey conducted in the general population of a region in northern Germany, participants were randomly selected from resident registration office files, contacted and interviewed personally (n = 4.075). A total of 302 subjects who showed hazardous drinking behaviour (n = 202) or met diagnostic criteria of alcohol misuse (n = 46) or alcohol dependence (n = 54) were assessed and diagnosed using the Munich Composite International Diagnostic Interview (M-CIDI) according to DSM-IV diagnostic criteria. The battery of self-report questionnaires comprised, among others, the RCQ, and two methods of allocation were used, the quick method and the refined method of allocation. According to the method of allocation used, the stages are: precontemplation (PC), contemplation (C), preparation (P) and action (A); P may only be assigned using the refined method.
RESULTS: The RCQ, a brief instrument to assess stages of change in individuals sampled from the general population, gave internal consistencies of: PC = 0.68, C = 0.79, A = 0.83. Allocation to stages of change according to the quick method resulted in 67% of subjects being allocated to PC, 24% to C and 8% to A and according to the refined method in 58% to PC, 15% to C, 4% to P, 4% to A, with 19% not being classified because of non-theory-consistent scale profiles.
CONCLUSIONS: Classification did not differ substantially according to the method of allocation. A three-factor solution, as reported in the literature, could not be replicated. Allocation to stages of change with the RCQ reflected predictions made from the Transtheoretical Model of behaviour change.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12107039     DOI: 10.1093/alcalc/37.4.362

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Alcohol Alcohol        ISSN: 0735-0414            Impact factor:   2.826


  11 in total

1.  Readiness to change and risk drinking women.

Authors:  Sonia Matwin; Grace Chang
Journal:  J Subst Abuse Treat       Date:  2010-12-28

2.  Preliminary program evaluation of emergency department HIV prevention counseling.

Authors:  Andrea P Sitlinger; Christopher J Lindsell; Andrew H Ruffner; D Beth Wayne; Kimberly W Hart; Alexander T Trott; Carl J Fichtenbaum; Michael S Lyons
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 5.721

3.  Factor, Concurrent and Predictive Validity of the Readiness to Change Questionnaire [Treatment Version] Among Non-Treatment-Seeking Individuals.

Authors:  Dylan K Richards; Osvaldo F Morera; José A Cabriales; Juliana Cardoso Smith; Craig A Field
Journal:  Alcohol Alcohol       Date:  2020-06-25       Impact factor: 2.826

4.  Readiness to change in adolescents screening positive for substance use in urban primary care clinics.

Authors:  Jack Stevens; Jennifer McGeehan; Kelly J Kelleher
Journal:  J Child Adolesc Subst Abuse       Date:  2010-04-01

5.  Which came first: the readiness or the change? Longitudinal relationships between readiness to change and drinking among college drinkers.

Authors:  Susan E Collins; Diane E Logan; Clayton Neighbors
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2010-09-20       Impact factor: 6.526

6.  @myTabu-A Placebo Controlled Randomized Trial of a Guided Web-Based Intervention for Individuals Who Sexually Abused Children and Individuals Who Consumed Child Sexual Exploitation Material: A Clinical Study Protocol.

Authors:  Peter Fromberger; Sonja Schröder; Louisa Bauer; Bruno Siegel; Safiye Tozdan; Peer Briken; Claudia Buntrock; Sonja Etzler; Martin Rettenberger; Andreas Leha; Jürgen L Müller
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2021-01-08       Impact factor: 4.157

7.  Proactive automatised lifestyle intervention (PAL) in general hospital patients: study protocol of a single-group trial.

Authors:  Jennis Freyer-Adam; Filipa Krolo; Anika Tiede; Christian Goeze; Kornelia Sadewasser; Marie Spielmann; Kristian Krause; Ulrich John
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-09-19       Impact factor: 3.006

8.  The readiness to change and insight in alcohol dependent patients.

Authors:  Kyoung Min Kim; Jong Sung Kim; Gap Jung Kim; Sung Soo Kim; Jin Gyu Jung; Seong Min Kim; Han Ju Pack; Dong Hoon Lee
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 2.153

9.  The challenge of patient adherence.

Authors:  Leslie R Martin; Summer L Williams; Kelly B Haskard; M Robin Dimatteo
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 2.423

10.  Evaluating the (cost-)effectiveness of guided and unguided Internet-based self-help for problematic alcohol use in employees--a three arm randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Leif Boß; Dirk Lehr; Matthias Berking; Heleen Riper; Michael Patrick Schaub; David Daniel Ebert
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2015-10-12       Impact factor: 3.295

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.