BACKGROUND: Our study aims were to investigate breast cancer patients with micrometastases or isolated tumor cells (ITCs) in sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) to determine the rate of non-SLN metastasis and axillary recurrences, and to compare actual non-SLN metastasis rates with those predicted by the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) nomogram. METHODS: We identified 116 stage I to III breast cancer patients who underwent sentinel lymph node biopsy and had micrometastases or ITCs (<2-mm deposits). Patients underwent completion axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) (group 1) or had no further axillary surgery (group 2). P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Of 116 patients with micrometastases or ITCs in SLNs, 55 (47%) underwent completion ALND (group 1), and 61 (53%) had no further axillary surgery (group 2). The rate of non-SLN metastases in group 1 patients was 9 (16%) of 55, which was significantly less than that predicted by the MSKCC nomogram (median 30%, P < 0.001). Patient age, race, tumor histology, tumor grade, estrogen receptor/Her-2neu status, and lymphovascular invasion did not differ significantly between group 1 patients with positive non-SLNs and those with negative non-SLNs (P > 0.05 for each), but patients with positive non-SLNs had larger tumors (P < 0.001). No patient in group 1 experienced an axillary recurrence, while only one patient (1.6%) in group 2 experienced axillary recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: The actual rate of positive non-SLNs for breast cancer patients with SLN micrometastases or ITCs who underwent completion ALND was significantly less than that predicted by the MSKCC nomogram. The rate of axillary recurrence is negligible, regardless of the extent of axillary staging.
BACKGROUND: Our study aims were to investigate breast cancerpatients with micrometastases or isolated tumor cells (ITCs) in sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) to determine the rate of non-SLN metastasis and axillary recurrences, and to compare actual non-SLN metastasis rates with those predicted by the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) nomogram. METHODS: We identified 116 stage I to III breast cancerpatients who underwent sentinel lymph node biopsy and had micrometastases or ITCs (<2-mm deposits). Patients underwent completion axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) (group 1) or had no further axillary surgery (group 2). P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Of 116 patients with micrometastases or ITCs in SLNs, 55 (47%) underwent completion ALND (group 1), and 61 (53%) had no further axillary surgery (group 2). The rate of non-SLNmetastases in group 1 patients was 9 (16%) of 55, which was significantly less than that predicted by the MSKCC nomogram (median 30%, P < 0.001). Patient age, race, tumor histology, tumor grade, estrogen receptor/Her-2neu status, and lymphovascular invasion did not differ significantly between group 1 patients with positive non-SLNs and those with negative non-SLNs (P > 0.05 for each), but patients with positive non-SLNs had larger tumors (P < 0.001). No patient in group 1 experienced an axillary recurrence, while only one patient (1.6%) in group 2 experienced axillary recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: The actual rate of positive non-SLNs for breast cancerpatients with SLNmicrometastases or ITCs who underwent completion ALND was significantly less than that predicted by the MSKCC nomogram. The rate of axillary recurrence is negligible, regardless of the extent of axillary staging.
Authors: G Cserni; D Gregori; F Merletti; A Sapino; M P Mano; A Ponti; S Sandrucci; B Baltás; G Bussolati Journal: Br J Surg Date: 2004-10 Impact factor: 6.939
Authors: Jerri S Fant; Michael D Grant; Sally M Knox; Sheryl A Livingston; Kimberly Ridl; Ronald C Jones; Joseph A Kuhn Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2003-03 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Michael Knauer; Stella Mook; Emiel J T Rutgers; Richard A Bender; Michael Hauptmann; Marc J van de Vijver; Rutger H T Koornstra; Jolien M Bueno-de-Mesquita; Sabine C Linn; Laura J van 't Veer Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2010-03-05 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Kimberly J Van Zee; Donna-Marie E Manasseh; Jose L B Bevilacqua; Susan K Boolbol; Jane V Fey; Lee K Tan; Patrick I Borgen; Hiram S Cody; Michael W Kattan Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2003-12 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Arpana M Naik; Jane Fey; Mary Gemignani; Alexandra Heerdt; Leslie Montgomery; Jeanne Petrek; Elisa Port; Virgilio Sacchini; Lisa Sclafani; Kimberly VanZee; Raquel Wagman; Patrick I Borgen; Hiram S Cody Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2004-09 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: D P Joyce; A J Lowery; L B McGrath-Soo; E Downey; L Kelly; G T O'Donoghue; M Barry; A D K Hill Journal: Ir J Med Sci Date: 2015-01-17 Impact factor: 1.568
Authors: Antonio Piñero; Manuel Canteras; Arancha Moreno; Francisco Vicente; Julia Giménez; Ana Tocino; Edelmiro Iglesias; Sergi Vidal-Sicart; Luzdivina Santamaría; Miguel Lorenzo; Manuel García; Diego Ramirez Journal: Clin Transl Oncol Date: 2012-07-25 Impact factor: 3.405
Authors: Claire M T P Francissen; Pim J M Dings; Thijs van Dalen; Luc J A Strobbe; Hanneke W M van Laarhoven; Johannes H W de Wilt Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2012-08-14 Impact factor: 5.344