PURPOSE: To evaluate the potential of diffusion-weighted (DW) magnetic resonance (MR) imaging with an apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) map in the prediction of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study was approved by the institutional review board, which waived the informed consent requirement. Fifty-three consecutive women (mean age, 43.7 years; median age, 42.0 years; age range, 24-65 years) with 53 invasive breast cancers (mean diameter, 5.0 cm; median diameter, 4.2 cm; diameter range, 2.0-13.3 cm) who had undergone chemotherapy were included. Both DW MR imaging (b values, 0 and 750 sec/mm(2)) and dynamic contrast material-enhanced (DCE) MR imaging were performed at 1.5 T before and after chemotherapy prior to surgery. Mean time from initiation of chemotherapy to posttreatment ADC measurement was 54 days (range, 48-62 days). Average ADC for three regions of interest per tumor on ADC maps was calculated. Patients with a reduction in tumor diameter of at least 30% after chemotherapy at DCE MR imaging were defined as responders. Pretreatment ADCs and percentage increases in ADC after chemotherapy in responders and nonresponders were compared. The best pretreatment ADC cutoff with which to differentiate between responders and nonresponders was calculated with receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. RESULTS: After chemotherapy, 36 (68%) patients were classified as responders, and 17 (32%) were classified as nonresponders. Pretreatment mean ADC ([1.036 ± 0.015] × 10(-3) mm(2)/sec [standard error]) of responders was significantly lower than that of nonresponders ([1.299 ± 0.079] × 10(-3) mm(2)/sec) (P = .004). Furthermore, mean percentage ADC increase of responders (47.9% ± 4.8) was higher than that of nonresponders (18.1% ± 4.5) (P < .001). The best pretreatment ADC cutoff with which to differentiate between responders and nonresponders was 1.17 × 10(-3) mm(2)/sec, which yielded a sensitivity of 94% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 81%, 99%) and a specificity of 71% (95% CI: 44%, 90%). CONCLUSION: Patients with breast cancer and a low pretreatment ADC tended to respond better to chemotherapy. Prediction of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy with DW MR imaging might help physicians individualize treatments and avoid ineffective chemotherapy.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the potential of diffusion-weighted (DW) magnetic resonance (MR) imaging with an apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) map in the prediction of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study was approved by the institutional review board, which waived the informed consent requirement. Fifty-three consecutive women (mean age, 43.7 years; median age, 42.0 years; age range, 24-65 years) with 53 invasive breast cancers (mean diameter, 5.0 cm; median diameter, 4.2 cm; diameter range, 2.0-13.3 cm) who had undergone chemotherapy were included. Both DW MR imaging (b values, 0 and 750 sec/mm(2)) and dynamic contrast material-enhanced (DCE) MR imaging were performed at 1.5 T before and after chemotherapy prior to surgery. Mean time from initiation of chemotherapy to posttreatment ADC measurement was 54 days (range, 48-62 days). Average ADC for three regions of interest per tumor on ADC maps was calculated. Patients with a reduction in tumor diameter of at least 30% after chemotherapy at DCE MR imaging were defined as responders. Pretreatment ADCs and percentage increases in ADC after chemotherapy in responders and nonresponders were compared. The best pretreatment ADC cutoff with which to differentiate between responders and nonresponders was calculated with receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. RESULTS: After chemotherapy, 36 (68%) patients were classified as responders, and 17 (32%) were classified as nonresponders. Pretreatment mean ADC ([1.036 ± 0.015] × 10(-3) mm(2)/sec [standard error]) of responders was significantly lower than that of nonresponders ([1.299 ± 0.079] × 10(-3) mm(2)/sec) (P = .004). Furthermore, mean percentage ADC increase of responders (47.9% ± 4.8) was higher than that of nonresponders (18.1% ± 4.5) (P < .001). The best pretreatment ADC cutoff with which to differentiate between responders and nonresponders was 1.17 × 10(-3) mm(2)/sec, which yielded a sensitivity of 94% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 81%, 99%) and a specificity of 71% (95% CI: 44%, 90%). CONCLUSION:Patients with breast cancer and a low pretreatment ADC tended to respond better to chemotherapy. Prediction of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy with DW MR imaging might help physicians individualize treatments and avoid ineffective chemotherapy.
Authors: Vincent Lai; Xiao Li; Victor Ho Fun Lee; Ka On Lam; Daniel Yee Tak Fong; Bingsheng Huang; Queenie Chan; Pek Lan Khong Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2013-08-29 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Alicia S Borggreve; Lucas Goense; Hylke J F Brenkman; Stella Mook; Gert J Meijer; Frank J Wessels; Marcel Verheij; Edwin P M Jansen; Richard van Hillegersberg; Peter S N van Rossum; Jelle P Ruurda Journal: Br J Radiol Date: 2019-03-05 Impact factor: 3.039
Authors: Yong Chen; Ananya Panda; Shivani Pahwa; Jesse I Hamilton; Sara Dastmalchian; Debra F McGivney; Dan Ma; Joshua Batesole; Nicole Seiberlich; Mark A Griswold; Donna Plecha; Vikas Gulani Journal: Radiology Date: 2018-10-30 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: R Prevos; M L Smidt; V C G Tjan-Heijnen; M van Goethem; R G Beets-Tan; J E Wildberger; M B I Lobbes Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2012-09-16 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Francesco De Cobelli; Francesco Giganti; Elena Orsenigo; Michaela Cellina; Antonio Esposito; Giulia Agostini; Luca Albarello; Elena Mazza; Alessandro Ambrosi; Carlo Socci; Carlo Staudacher; Alessandro Del Maschio Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2013-04-16 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Richard G Abramson; Lori R Arlinghaus; Jared A Weis; Xia Li; Adrienne N Dula; Eduard Y Chekmenev; Seth A Smith; Michael I Miga; Vandana G Abramson; Thomas E Yankeelov Journal: Breast Cancer (Dove Med Press) Date: 2012-10