Literature DB >> 20849011

Medical professionalism: what does the public think?

Madawa Chandratilake1, Sean McAleer, John Gibson, Sue Roff.   

Abstract

In the context of professionalism being viewed increasingly as a social contract, a survey was conducted to investigate the importance placed by the general public on doctors' professional attributes. A quota sample of 953 responded to a 55-item online inventory of professional attributes. The quotas closely represented the national census. The majority of the highly important attributes focused on the relationship with patients. Statistically, the responses emerged as a three-facet model (clinicianship, workmanship and citizenship) of medical professionalism. The general public did not equate professionalism with social standing, wealth production, physique or appearance. They recognised doctors as professionals by their good behaviour, high values and positive attitudes as clinicians, workmen and citizens. Although, their preference of professional attributes varied with the setting, eg patient consultation, working with others and behaving in society, they expected doctors to be confident, reliable, dependable, composed, accountable and dedicated across all settings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20849011      PMCID: PMC4952166          DOI: 10.7861/clinmedicine.10-4-364

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Med (Lond)        ISSN: 1470-2118            Impact factor:   2.659


  3 in total

1.  You are exactly my type! The traits of a good doctor: a factor analysis study on public's perspectives.

Authors:  Julia S Grundnig; Verena Steiner-Hofbauer; Viktoria Drexler; Anita Holzinger
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-07-08       Impact factor: 2.908

Review 2.  Risks and benefits of Twitter use by hematologists/oncologists in the era of digital medicine.

Authors:  Deanna J Attai; Patricia F Anderson; Michael J Fisch; David L Graham; Matthew S Katz; Jennifer Kesselheim; Merry Jennifer Markham; Nathan A Pennell; Mina S Sedrak; Michael A Thompson; Audun Utengen; Don S Dizon
Journal:  Semin Hematol       Date:  2017-08-12       Impact factor: 3.851

Review 3.  Assessing medical professionalism: A systematic review of instruments and their measurement properties.

Authors:  Honghe Li; Ning Ding; Yuanyuan Zhang; Yang Liu; Deliang Wen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-05-12       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.