Literature DB >> 20848603

Measuring recollection and familiarity in the medial temporal lobe.

John T Wixted1, Laura Mickes, Larry R Squire.   

Abstract

Many recent studies have investigated how the structures of the medial temporal lobe (MTL) support recollection and familiarity, which are two processes widely thought to support recognition memory. The behavioral methods that are used to isolate recollection and familiarity in neuroimaging and lesion studies typically assume that recollection is a categorical process and not a continuous process. A categorical process is one that either occurs or does not occur for a particular test item (yielding high confidence and high accuracy when it does occur), whereas a continuous process is one that comes in degrees (yielding varying degrees of confidence and accuracy). Studies suggesting that the hippocampus selectively supports the recollection process (such as those that use the Remember/Know procedure or rely on Receiver Operating Characteristic analysis) generally depend on the categorical view of recollection, but much recent evidence suggests that recollection is a continuous process. If recollection is a continuous process (i.e., if recollection comes in degrees), then evidence that has been taken to mean that the hippocampus selectively supports recollection is also compatible with the idea that the hippocampus supports both recollection and familiarity. We suggest that an alternative method can be used to effectively investigate recollection and familiarity in the MTL, one that is valid whether recollection is a categorical or a continuous process.
© 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20848603      PMCID: PMC2975576          DOI: 10.1002/hipo.20854

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hippocampus        ISSN: 1050-9631            Impact factor:   3.899


  42 in total

1.  Familiarity and recollection in item and associative recognition.

Authors:  W E Hockley; A Consoli
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1999-07

2.  Recollection-like memory retrieval in rats is dependent on the hippocampus.

Authors:  Norbert J Fortin; Sean P Wright; Howard Eichenbaum
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-09-09       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  In defense of the signal detection interpretation of remember/know judgments.

Authors:  John T Wixted; Vincent Stretch
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-08

4.  Separating the brain regions involved in recollection and familiarity in recognition memory.

Authors:  Andrew P Yonelinas; Leun J Otten; Kendra N Shaw; Michael D Rugg
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2005-03-16       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  A dissociation of encoding and retrieval processes in the human hippocampus.

Authors:  Laura L Eldridge; Stephen A Engel; Michael M Zeineh; Susan Y Bookheimer; Barbara J Knowlton
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2005-03-30       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Sparing of the familiarity component of recognition memory in a patient with hippocampal pathology.

Authors:  John P Aggleton; Seralynne D Vann; Christine Denby; Sophie Dix; Andrew R Mayes; Neil Roberts; Andrew P Yonelinas
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2005-03-16       Impact factor: 3.139

7.  Support for a continuous (single-process) model of recognition memory and source memory.

Authors:  Scott D Slotnick; Chad S Dodson
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2005-01

8.  Recognition memory ROCs for item and associative information: the contribution of recollection and familiarity.

Authors:  A P Yonelinas
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1997-11

9.  Remembering and knowing: two means of access to the personal past.

Authors:  S Rajaram
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1993-01

10.  The hippocampus supports both the recollection and the familiarity components of recognition memory.

Authors:  Peter E Wais; John T Wixted; Ramona O Hopkins; Larry R Squire
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2006-02-02       Impact factor: 17.173

View more
  34 in total

1.  Hippocampal activity during recognition memory co-varies with the accuracy and confidence of source memory judgments.

Authors:  Sarah S Yu; Jeffrey D Johnson; Michael D Rugg
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2011-11-11       Impact factor: 3.899

2.  Effects of modality on the neural correlates of encoding processes supporting recollection and familiarity.

Authors:  Lauren J Gottlieb; Michael D Rugg
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2011-08-18       Impact factor: 2.460

Review 3.  Towards a functional organization of episodic memory in the medial temporal lobe.

Authors:  Howard Eichenbaum; Magdalena Sauvage; Norbert Fortin; Robert Komorowski; Paul Lipton
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2011-07-23       Impact factor: 8.989

4.  The Effects of Age on the Neural Correlates of Recollection Success, Recollection-Related Cortical Reinstatement, and Post-Retrieval Monitoring.

Authors:  Tracy H Wang; Jeffrey D Johnson; Marianne de Chastelaine; Brian E Donley; Michael D Rugg
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2015-01-28       Impact factor: 5.357

5.  Stability of age-related deficits in the mnemonic similarity task across task variations.

Authors:  Shauna M Stark; Rebecca Stevenson; Claudia Wu; Samantha Rutledge; Craig E L Stark
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 1.912

6.  Neural correlates of confidence during item recognition and source memory retrieval: evidence for both dual-process and strength memory theories.

Authors:  Scott M Hayes; Norbou Buchler; Jared Stokes; James Kragel; Roberto Cabeza
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2011-07-07       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Source accuracy data reveal the thresholded nature of human episodic memory.

Authors:  Iain M Harlow; David I Donaldson
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-04

Review 8.  Item memory, context memory and the hippocampus: fMRI evidence.

Authors:  Michael D Rugg; Kaia L Vilberg; Julia T Mattson; Sarah S Yu; Jeffrey D Johnson; Maki Suzuki
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2012-06-23       Impact factor: 3.139

9.  Serial position functions following selective hippocampal lesions in monkeys: effects of delays and interference.

Authors:  Jocelyne Bachevalier; Anthony A Wright; Jeffrey S Katz
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2012-12-16       Impact factor: 1.777

10.  The human hippocampus contributes to both the recollection and familiarity components of recognition memory.

Authors:  Maxwell B Merkow; John F Burke; Michael J Kahana
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-11-02       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.