Literature DB >> 20847346

The costs of diabetic foot: the economic case for the limb salvage team.

Vickie R Driver1, Matteo Fabbi, Lawrence A Lavery, Gary Gibbons.   

Abstract

In 2007, the treatment of diabetes and its complications in the United States generated at least $116 billion in direct costs; at least 33% of these costs were linked to the treatment of foot ulcers. Although the team approach to diabetic foot problems is effective in preventing lower-extremity amputations, the costs associated with implementing a diabetic-foot-care team are not well understood. An analysis of these costs provides the basis for this report. Diabetic foot problems impose a major economic burden, and costs increase disproportionately to the severity of the condition. Compared with diabetic patients without foot ulcers, the cost of care for those with foot ulcers is 5.4 times higher in the year after the first ulcer episode and 2.8 times higher in the second year. Costs for treating the highest-grade ulcers are 8 times higher than are those for treating low-grade ulcers. Patients with diabetic foot ulcers require more frequent emergency department visits and are more commonly admitted to the hospital, requiring longer lengths of stay. Implementation of the team approach to manage diabetic foot ulcers in a given region or health-care system has been reported to reduce long-term amputation rates 62% to 82%. Limb salvage efforts may include aggressive therapy such as revascularization procedures and advanced wound-healing modalities. Although these procedures are costly, the team approach gradually leads to improved screening and prevention programs and earlier interventions and, thus, seems to reduce long-term costs. To date, aggressive limb preservation management for patients with diabetic foot ulcers has not usually been paired with adequate reimbursement. It is essential to direct efforts in patient-caregiver education to allow early recognition and management of all diabetic foot problems and to build integrated pathways of care that facilitate timely access to limb salvage procedures. Increasing evidence suggests that the costs of implementing diabetic foot teams can be offset in the long term by improved access to care and reductions in foot complications and amputation rates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20847346     DOI: 10.7547/1000335

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Podiatr Med Assoc        ISSN: 1930-8264


  37 in total

1.  The use of a portable, wearable form of pulsed radio frequency electromagnetic energy device for the healing of recalcitrant ulcers: a case report.

Authors:  Ian M Rawe; Tracey C Vlahovic
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2011-09-20       Impact factor: 3.315

2.  Pilot study to evaluate a novel three-dimensional wound measurement device.

Authors:  Jessica D Bills; Sandra J Berriman; Debby L Noble; Lawrence A Lavery; Kathryn E Davis
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2015-11-11       Impact factor: 3.315

Review 3.  Macroscale delivery systems for molecular and cellular payloads.

Authors:  Cathal J Kearney; David J Mooney
Journal:  Nat Mater       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 43.841

4.  Reduction in wound healing times, cost of consumables and number of visits treated through the implementation of an electronic wound care system in rural Australia.

Authors:  Hanan Khalil; Marianne Cullen; Helen Chambers; Matthew Carroll; Judi Walker
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2015-02-09       Impact factor: 3.315

Review 5.  Multidisciplinary Approach to PAD: Who's on Your Team?

Authors:  Sabeen Dhand
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2019-02-05       Impact factor: 1.513

Review 6.  Wound samples: moving towards a standardised method of collection and analysis.

Authors:  Sarah Ramsay; Linda Cowan; Jeffrey M Davidson; Lillian Nanney; Gregory Schultz
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2015-01-11       Impact factor: 3.315

7.  Smoking, chronic wound healing, and implications for evidence-based practice.

Authors:  Jodi C McDaniel; Kristine K Browning
Journal:  J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs       Date:  2014 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.741

8.  Degradable Hydrogels for the Delivery of Immune-modulatory Proteins in the Wound Environment.

Authors:  Margarete Johnson; Jessica Lloyd; Srinivas Tekkam; Stephen N Crooke; Deborah A Witherden; Wendy L Havran; M G Finn
Journal:  ACS Appl Bio Mater       Date:  2020-07-18

9.  Effect of intensive nursing education on the prevention of diabetic foot ulceration among patients with high-risk diabetic foot: a follow-up analysis.

Authors:  Meng Ren; Chuan Yang; Diao Zhu Lin; Hui Sheng Xiao; Li Fang Mai; Yi Chen Guo; Li Yan
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2014-07-08       Impact factor: 6.118

Review 10.  Vascular assessment of wound healing: a clinical review.

Authors:  William W Li; Marissa J Carter; Elad Mashiach; Stephen D Guthrie
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2016-07-04       Impact factor: 3.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.