RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVE: The M-band represents a transverse structure in the center of the sarcomeric A-band and provides an anchor for the myosin-containing thick filaments. In contrast to other sarcomeric structures, eg, the Z-disc, only few M-band-specific proteins have been identified to date, and its exact molecular composition remains unclear. METHODS AND RESULTS: Using a bioinformatic approach to identify novel heart- and muscle-specific genes, we found a leucine rich protein, myomasp (Myosin-interacting, M-band-associated stress-responsive protein)/LRRC39. RT-PCR and Northern and Western blot analyses confirmed a cardiac-enriched expression pattern, and immunolocalization of myomasp revealed a strong and specific signal at the sarcomeric M-band. Yeast 2-hybrid screens, as well as coimmunoprecipitation experiments, identified the C terminus of myosin heavy chain (MYH)7 as an interaction partner for myomasp. Knockdown of myomasp in neonatal rat ventricular myocytes (NRVCMs) led to a significant upregulation of the stretch-sensitive genes GDF-15 and BNP. Conversely, the expression of MYH7 and the M-band proteins myomesin-1 and -2 was found to be markedly reduced. Mechanistically, knockdown of myomasp in NRVCM led to a dose-dependent suppression of serum response factor-dependent gene expression, consistent with earlier observations linking the M-band to serum response factor-mediated signaling. Finally, downregulation of myomasp/LRRC39 in spontaneously beating engineered heart tissue constructs resulted in significantly lower force generation and reduced fractional shortening. Likewise, knockdown of the myomasp/LRRC39 ortholog in zebrafish resulted in severely impaired heart function and cardiomyopathy in vivo. CONCLUSIONS: These findings reveal myomasp as a previously unrecognized component of an M-band-associated signaling pathway that regulates cardiomyocyte gene expression in response to biomechanical stress.
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVE: The M-band represents a transverse structure in the center of the sarcomeric A-band and provides an anchor for the myosin-containing thick filaments. In contrast to other sarcomeric structures, eg, the Z-disc, only few M-band-specific proteins have been identified to date, and its exact molecular composition remains unclear. METHODS AND RESULTS: Using a bioinformatic approach to identify novel heart- and muscle-specific genes, we found a leucine rich protein, myomasp (Myosin-interacting, M-band-associated stress-responsive protein)/LRRC39. RT-PCR and Northern and Western blot analyses confirmed a cardiac-enriched expression pattern, and immunolocalization of myomasp revealed a strong and specific signal at the sarcomeric M-band. Yeast 2-hybrid screens, as well as coimmunoprecipitation experiments, identified the C terminus of myosin heavy chain (MYH)7 as an interaction partner for myomasp. Knockdown of myomasp in neonatal rat ventricular myocytes (NRVCMs) led to a significant upregulation of the stretch-sensitive genes GDF-15 and BNP. Conversely, the expression of MYH7 and the M-band proteins myomesin-1 and -2 was found to be markedly reduced. Mechanistically, knockdown of myomasp in NRVCM led to a dose-dependent suppression of serum response factor-dependent gene expression, consistent with earlier observations linking the M-band to serum response factor-mediated signaling. Finally, downregulation of myomasp/LRRC39 in spontaneously beating engineered heart tissue constructs resulted in significantly lower force generation and reduced fractional shortening. Likewise, knockdown of the myomasp/LRRC39 ortholog in zebrafish resulted in severely impaired heart function and cardiomyopathy in vivo. CONCLUSIONS: These findings reveal myomasp as a previously unrecognized component of an M-band-associated signaling pathway that regulates cardiomyocyte gene expression in response to biomechanical stress.
Authors: Franziska Dierck; Christian Kuhn; Claudia Rohr; Susanne Hille; Julia Braune; Samuel Sossalla; Sibylle Molt; Peter F M van der Ven; Dieter O Fürst; Norbert Frey Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2017-07-17 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: Subham Dasgupta; Vanessa Cheng; Sara M F Vliet; Constance A Mitchell; David C Volz Journal: Environ Sci Technol Date: 2018-09-10 Impact factor: 9.028
Authors: Matthew J Brody; Li Feng; Adrian C Grimes; Timothy A Hacker; Timothy M Olson; Timothy J Kamp; Ravi C Balijepalli; Youngsook Lee Journal: Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol Date: 2015-11-25 Impact factor: 4.733
Authors: Matthew J Brody; Timothy A Hacker; Jitandrakumar R Patel; Li Feng; Junichi Sadoshima; Sergei G Tevosian; Ravi C Balijepalli; Richard L Moss; Youngsook Lee Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-12-07 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Roman Schoenauer; Maximilian Y Emmert; Allison Felley; Elisabeth Ehler; Chad Brokopp; Benedikt Weber; Mohamed Nemir; Giuseppe G Faggian; Thierry Pedrazzini; Volkmar Falk; Simon P Hoerstrup; Irina Agarkova Journal: Basic Res Cardiol Date: 2010-11-11 Impact factor: 17.165