Manjing Cao1, Sha Wang2,3, Jing Zou2,3, Wanpeng Wang2,3. 1. Department of Ophthalmology, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China. 2. Eye Center of Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China. 3. Hunan Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Retinoblastoma (RB) is one common pediatric malignant tumor with dismal outcomes. Heterogeneity of RB and subtypes of RB were identified but the association between the subtypes of RB and RB progression have not been fully investigated. METHODS: Four public datasets were downloaded from Gene expression omnibus and normalization was performed to remove batch effect. Two public datasets were explored to obtain the RB progression gene signatures by differentially expression analysis while another two datasets were iterated for RB subtypes identification using consensus clustering. After the RB progressive subtype gene signatures were identified, we tested the diagnostic capacity of these gene signatures by receiver operation curve. RESULTS: Three hundreds and forty six genes that were enriched in cell cycle were identified as the progression signature in RB from two independent datasets. Four subtypes of RB were stratified by consensus clustering. A total of 21 genes from RB progression signature were differentially expressed between RB subtypes. One subtype with low expression cell division genes have less progression of all four subtypes. A panel of five RB subtype genes (CLUL1, CNGB1, ROM1, LRRC39 and RDH12) predict progression of RB. CONCLUSION: Retinoblastoma is a highly heterogeneous tumor and the level of cell cycle related gene expression is associated with RB progression. A subpopulation of RB with high expression of visual perception has less progressive features. LRRC39 is potentially the RB progression subtype biomarker.
INTRODUCTION: Retinoblastoma (RB) is one common pediatric malignant tumor with dismal outcomes. Heterogeneity of RB and subtypes of RB were identified but the association between the subtypes of RB and RB progression have not been fully investigated. METHODS: Four public datasets were downloaded from Gene expression omnibus and normalization was performed to remove batch effect. Two public datasets were explored to obtain the RB progression gene signatures by differentially expression analysis while another two datasets were iterated for RB subtypes identification using consensus clustering. After the RB progressive subtype gene signatures were identified, we tested the diagnostic capacity of these gene signatures by receiver operation curve. RESULTS: Three hundreds and forty six genes that were enriched in cell cycle were identified as the progression signature in RB from two independent datasets. Four subtypes of RB were stratified by consensus clustering. A total of 21 genes from RB progression signature were differentially expressed between RB subtypes. One subtype with low expression cell division genes have less progression of all four subtypes. A panel of five RB subtype genes (CLUL1, CNGB1, ROM1, LRRC39 and RDH12) predict progression of RB. CONCLUSION: Retinoblastoma is a highly heterogeneous tumor and the level of cell cycle related gene expression is associated with RB progression. A subpopulation of RB with high expression of visual perception has less progressive features. LRRC39 is potentially the RB progression subtype biomarker.
Authors: Evan Z Macosko; Anindita Basu; Rahul Satija; James Nemesh; Karthik Shekhar; Melissa Goldman; Itay Tirosh; Allison R Bialas; Nolan Kamitaki; Emily M Martersteck; John J Trombetta; David A Weitz; Joshua R Sanes; Alex K Shalek; Aviv Regev; Steven A McCarroll Journal: Cell Date: 2015-05-21 Impact factor: 41.582
Authors: Roel G W Verhaak; Katherine A Hoadley; Elizabeth Purdom; Victoria Wang; Yuan Qi; Matthew D Wilkerson; C Ryan Miller; Li Ding; Todd Golub; Jill P Mesirov; Gabriele Alexe; Michael Lawrence; Michael O'Kelly; Pablo Tamayo; Barbara A Weir; Stacey Gabriel; Wendy Winckler; Supriya Gupta; Lakshmi Jakkula; Heidi S Feiler; J Graeme Hodgson; C David James; Jann N Sarkaria; Cameron Brennan; Ari Kahn; Paul T Spellman; Richard K Wilson; Terence P Speed; Joe W Gray; Matthew Meyerson; Gad Getz; Charles M Perou; D Neil Hayes Journal: Cancer Cell Date: 2010-01-19 Impact factor: 31.743
Authors: Carolina Rubio; Mónica Martínez-Fernández; Cristina Segovia; Iris Lodewijk; Cristian Suarez-Cabrera; Carmen Segrelles; Fernando López-Calderón; Ester Munera-Maravilla; Mirentxu Santos; Alejandra Bernardini; Ramón García-Escudero; Corina Lorz; Maria José Gómez-Rodriguez; Guillermo de Velasco; Irene Otero; Felipe Villacampa; Felix Guerrero-Ramos; Sergio Ruiz; Federico de la Rosa; Sara Domínguez-Rodríguez; Francisco X Real; Núria Malats; Daniel Castellano; Marta Dueñas; Jesus M Paramio Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2018-09-21 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: G Kapatai; M-A Brundler; H Jenkinson; P Kearns; M Parulekar; A C Peet; C M McConville Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2013-06-11 Impact factor: 7.640