PURPOSE: Detection of light in the eye contributes both to spatial awareness (form vision) and to responses that acclimate an animal to gross changes in light (irradiance detection). This dual role means that eye disease that disrupts form vision can also adversely affect physiology and behavioral state. The purpose of this study was to investigate how inner retinal circuitry mediating rod-cone photoreceptor input contributes to functionally distinct irradiance responses and whether that might account for phenotypic diversity in retinal disease. METHODS: The sensitivity of the pupillary light reflex and negative masking (activity suppression by light) was measured in wild-type mice with intact inner retinal circuitry, Nob4 mice that lack ON-bipolar cell function, and rd1 mice that lack rods and cones and, therefore, have no input to ON or OFF bipolar cells. RESULTS: An expected increase in sensitivity to negative masking with loss of photoreceptor input in rd1 was duplicated in Nob4 mice. In contrast, sensitivity of the pupillary light reflex was more severely reduced in rd1 than in Nob4 mice. CONCLUSIONS: Absence of ON-bipolar cell-mediated rod-cone input can fully explain the phenotype of outer retina degeneration for negative masking but not for the pupillary light reflex. Therefore, inner retinal pathways mediating rod-cone input are different for negative masking and the pupillary light reflex.
PURPOSE: Detection of light in the eye contributes both to spatial awareness (form vision) and to responses that acclimate an animal to gross changes in light (irradiance detection). This dual role means that eye disease that disrupts form vision can also adversely affect physiology and behavioral state. The purpose of this study was to investigate how inner retinal circuitry mediating rod-cone photoreceptor input contributes to functionally distinct irradiance responses and whether that might account for phenotypic diversity in retinal disease. METHODS: The sensitivity of the pupillary light reflex and negative masking (activity suppression by light) was measured in wild-type mice with intact inner retinal circuitry, Nob4mice that lack ON-bipolar cell function, and rd1mice that lack rods and cones and, therefore, have no input to ON or OFF bipolar cells. RESULTS: An expected increase in sensitivity to negative masking with loss of photoreceptor input in rd1 was duplicated in Nob4mice. In contrast, sensitivity of the pupillary light reflex was more severely reduced in rd1 than in Nob4mice. CONCLUSIONS: Absence of ON-bipolar cell-mediated rod-cone input can fully explain the phenotype of outer retina degeneration for negative masking but not for the pupillary light reflex. Therefore, inner retinal pathways mediating rod-cone input are different for negative masking and the pupillary light reflex.
Authors: Ali D Güler; Jennifer L Ecker; Gurprit S Lall; Shafiqul Haq; Cara M Altimus; Hsi-Wen Liao; Alun R Barnard; Hugh Cahill; Tudor C Badea; Haiqing Zhao; Mark W Hankins; David M Berson; Robert J Lucas; King-Wai Yau; Samer Hattar Journal: Nature Date: 2008-04-23 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Stewart Thompson; Robert F Mullins; Alisdair R Philp; Edwin M Stone; N Mrosovsky Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2008-06 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Guosong Hong; Tian-Ming Fu; Mu Qiao; Robert D Viveros; Xiao Yang; Tao Zhou; Jung Min Lee; Hong-Gyu Park; Joshua R Sanes; Charles M Lieber Journal: Science Date: 2018-06-29 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Steven Hughes; Carina A Pothecary; Aarti Jagannath; Russell G Foster; Mark W Hankins; Stuart N Peirson Journal: Eur J Neurosci Date: 2012-01 Impact factor: 3.386
Authors: Rebecca E H Whiting; Gang Yao; Kristina Narfström; Jacqueline W Pearce; Joan R Coates; John R Dodam; Leilani J Castaner; Martin L Katz Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2013-08-13 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Corinne Kostic; Sylvain V Crippa; Catherine Martin; Randy H Kardon; Martin Biel; Yvan Arsenijevic; Aki Kawasaki Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2016-05-01 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Stewart Thompson; Frederick R Blodi; Demelza R Larson; Michael G Anderson; Steven F Stasheff Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2019-05-01 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Ethan O Contreras; Carley G Dearing; Crystal A Ashinhurst; Betty A Fish; Sajila N Hossain; Ariana M Rey; Primal D Silva; Stewart Thompson Journal: PLoS One Date: 2021-01-25 Impact factor: 3.240