Literature DB >> 20846984

Prognostic significance of MRI-detected bladder muscle and/or serosal invasion in patients with cervical cancer treated with radiotherapy.

H Nam1, S J Huh, W Park, D S Bae, B G Kim, J H Lee, C K Kim, B K Park.   

Abstract

In cervical cancer, the prognostic significance of bladder wall invasion on MRI without pathological evidence of mucosal invasion is not known. From 454 consecutive patients with cervical cancer who were treated with radiation, we reviewed images and analysed the outcome of 92 patients with the Federation of International Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage IIIB-IVA. We analysed the patients in three groups, normal, wall (muscle and/or serosal) invasion and mucosal invasion, according to the findings on the MRI. Kaplan-Meier life table analysis and the log-rank test were used to assess the survival rates and differences according to prognostic factors. MRI detected abnormalities in the bladder wall in 42 patients (45.6%): wall invasion in 24 and mucosal invasion in 18. 5 of 18 patients, suspected on MRI to have mucosal invasion, showed no pathological evidence of mucosal invasion. Median follow-up period was 34 months. 3-year cause-specific survival (CSS) in the normal group compared with the wall invasion group was 76.2% vs 71.4% (p = 0.48). 3-year CSS for the wall invasion group compared with the mucosal invasion group was 71.4% vs 54.3% (p = 0.04). Mucosal invasion on MRI (p = 0.03) and concurrent chemoradiotherapy (p = 0.01) was significant for CSS. The prognosis for patients with cervical cancer with evidence of muscle and/or serosal invasion of the bladder on MRI may not differ from that for patients without abnormality on MRI. In patients with the MRI finding of bladder mucosal invasion, further studies should be conducted regarding the role of cystoscopy to determine the need for pathological confirmation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20846984      PMCID: PMC3473754          DOI: 10.1259/bjr/66646798

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  12 in total

1.  Laparoscopic staging compared with imaging techniques in the staging of advanced cervical cancer.

Authors:  Hermann Hertel; Christhardt Köhler; Tarek Elhawary; Wolfgang Michels; Marc Possover; Achim Schneider
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 5.482

2.  Can MRI rule out bladder and rectal invasion in cervical cancer to help select patients for limited EUA?

Authors:  A G Rockall; S Ghosh; F Alexander-Sefre; S Babar; M T S Younis; S Naz; I J Jacobs; R H Reznek
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2005-11-28       Impact factor: 5.482

3.  Carcinoma of the cervix uteri. FIGO 26th Annual Report on the Results of Treatment in Gynecological Cancer.

Authors:  M A Quinn; J L Benedet; F Odicino; P Maisonneuve; U Beller; W T Creasman; A P M Heintz; H Y S Ngan; S Pecorelli
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 3.561

4.  Early invasive cervical cancer: tumor delineation by magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography, and clinical examination, verified by pathologic results, in the ACRIN 6651/GOG 183 Intergroup Study.

Authors:  Donald G Mitchell; Bradley Snyder; Fergus Coakley; Caroline Reinhold; Gillian Thomas; Marco Amendola; Lawrence H Schwartz; Paula Woodward; Harpreet Pannu; Hedvig Hricak
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-12-20       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Invasion of the urinary bladder by uterine cervical carcinoma: evaluation with MR imaging.

Authors:  S H Kim; M C Han
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 3.959

6.  2002 annual report of the Korea Central Cancer Registry: based on registered data from 139 hospitals.

Authors:  Hai-Rim Shin; Kyu-Won Jung; Young-Joo Won; Jae-Gahb Park
Journal:  Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2004-04-30       Impact factor: 4.679

7.  Invasive cervical carcinoma: comparison of MR imaging and surgical findings.

Authors:  H Hricak; C G Lacey; L G Sandles; Y C Chang; M L Winkler; J L Stern
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Results and complications of operative staging in cervical cancer: experience of the Gynecologic Oncology Group.

Authors:  L D Lagasse; W T Creasman; H M Shingleton; J H Ford; J A Blessing
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  1980-02       Impact factor: 5.482

9.  The value of cystoscopy and intravenous urography after magnetic resonance imaging or computed tomography in the staging of cervical carcinoma.

Authors:  H Chung; H S Ahn; Y S Kim; E J Lee; H S Ryu; K H Chang; S J Kim
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 2.759

10.  Invasive cervical carcinoma: role of MR imaging in pretreatment work-up--cost minimization and diagnostic efficacy analysis.

Authors:  H Hricak; C B Powell; K K Yu; E Washington; L L Subak; J L Stern; M G Cisternas; R L Arenson
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  4 in total

1.  Indications for endoscopy according to the revised FIGO staging for cervical cancer after MRI and CT scanning.

Authors:  Bae Kwon Jeong; Seung Jae Huh; Doo Ho Choi; Won Park; Dongryul Oh; Taegyu Kim; Hye Bin Lee
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2012-04-03       Impact factor: 4.401

Review 2.  The role of imaging in pelvic exenteration for gynecological cancers.

Authors:  Pamela Ines Causa Andrieu; Sungmin Woo; Eric Rios-Doria; Yukio Sonoda; Soleen Ghafoor
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-05-07       Impact factor: 3.629

Review 3.  Implications of the new FIGO staging and the role of imaging in cervical cancer.

Authors:  Aki Kido; Yuji Nakamoto
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 3.629

Review 4.  [Uterine Cervical Cancer: Emphasis on Revised FIGO Staging 2018 and MRI].

Authors:  Weon Jang; Ji Soo Song
Journal:  Taehan Yongsang Uihakhoe Chi       Date:  2021-09-27
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.