Literature DB >> 12468341

Laparoscopic staging compared with imaging techniques in the staging of advanced cervical cancer.

Hermann Hertel1, Christhardt Köhler, Tarek Elhawary, Wolfgang Michels, Marc Possover, Achim Schneider.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the evidence of laparoscopy for decision regarding treatment options in advanced cervical cancer patients.
METHODS: One hundred nine consecutive patients with cervical cancer FIGO stage Ib2 and higher underwent laparoscopic staging of the extent of disease. Laparoscopic and histopathologic evaluation of tumor involvement of the paraaortic and pelvic lymph nodes, wall of the bladder, and rectal pillar was compared with preoperative findings of MRI and/or CT.
RESULTS: Paraaortic lymphadenectomy was performed in 101 (92.7%) patients and 21 (19.3%) patients had positive paraaortic lymph nodes. Pelvic lymphadenectomy was performed in 75 (68.8%) patients and 20 (26.7%) patients had positive pelvic lymph nodes. In 11 patients (11.5%) infiltration of the bladder and in 6 patients (6.25%) infiltration of the rectal pillar or cul-de-sac was found. Intraoperative complications associated with laparoscopic staging occurred in 3.7% of patients. The negative predictive value for the evaluation of paraaortic or pelvic lymph nodes, the bladder wall, rectal pillar, and cul-de-sac ranged from 73% (CT for pelvic lymph nodes) to 96% (MRI for bladder wall). Lack of information about the extent of disease was adjusted on the basis of laparoscopic findings in 24 (22%) patients and improved treatment plans.
CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic staging of patients with advanced cervical cancer is accurate, associated with low morbidity, and helps to adjust treatment according to extent of disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12468341     DOI: 10.1006/gyno.2002.6722

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Oncol        ISSN: 0090-8258            Impact factor:   5.482


  16 in total

1.  Prognostic significance of MRI-detected bladder muscle and/or serosal invasion in patients with cervical cancer treated with radiotherapy.

Authors:  H Nam; S J Huh; W Park; D S Bae; B G Kim; J H Lee; C K Kim; B K Park
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Survival benefit of laparoscopic surgical staging-guided radiation therapy in locally advanced cervical cancer.

Authors:  Dae Gy Hong; Nae Yoon Park; Gun Oh Chong; Young Lae Cho; Il Soo Park; Yoon Soon Lee
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2010-09-28       Impact factor: 4.401

Review 3.  Pre-treatment surgical para-aortic lymph node assessment in locally advanced cervical cancer.

Authors:  Elly Brockbank; Fani Kokka; Andrew Bryant; Christophe Pomel; Karina Reynolds
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2011-04-13

4.  Transperitoneal versus extraperitoneal para-aortic lymphadenectomy in patients with cervical cancer.

Authors:  Marilyn Huang; Brian M Slomovitz; Pedro T Ramirez
Journal:  Rev Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2009

5.  Patterns of care in patients with cervical cancer 2012: results of a survey among German radiotherapy departments and out-patient health care centers.

Authors:  S Marnitz; C Köhler; A Rauer; A Schneider; V Budach; A Tsunoda; M Mangler
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2013-07-27       Impact factor: 3.621

6.  Rate of para-aortic lymph node micrometastasis in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer.

Authors:  Behrouz Zand; Elizabeth D Euscher; Pamela T Soliman; Kathleen M Schmeler; Robert L Coleman; Michael Frumovitz; Anuja Jhingran; Lois M Ramondetta; Pedro T Ramirez
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2010-09-15       Impact factor: 5.482

7.  Laparoscopic extraperitoneal para-aortic lymphadenectomy in locally advanced cervical cancer: a prospective correlation of surgical findings with positron emission tomography/computed tomography findings.

Authors:  Pedro T Ramirez; Anuja Jhingran; Homer A Macapinlac; Elizabeth D Euscher; Mark F Munsell; Robert L Coleman; Pamela T Soliman; Kathleen M Schmeler; Michael Frumovitz; Lois M Ramondetta
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2010-11-16       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Aspects of Therapy for Cervical Cancer in Germany 2012 - Results from a Survey of German Gynaecological Hospitals.

Authors:  M Mangler; N Zech; A Schneider; C Köhler; S Marnitz
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 2.915

9.  Uterine cervical cancer metastases to mediastinal lymph nodes diagnosed by endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration.

Authors:  Somashekar G Krishna; Yezaz A Ghouri; Rei Suzuki; Manoop S Bhutani
Journal:  Endosc Ultrasound       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 5.628

10.  The evaluation of older patients with cervical cancer.

Authors:  Ying Gao; Jin-lu Ma; Fei Gao; Li-ping Song
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2013-06-25       Impact factor: 4.458

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.