| Literature DB >> 20846459 |
Peng Guo-Qing1, Yang Yuan, Zhong Cai-Gao, Yin Hongling, Hu Gonghua, Tian Yan.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Human 8-oguanine glycosylase 1(hOGG1), voltage-dependent anion channel 1(VDAC1), hexokinase 2(HK-2), represented the process of oxidative DNA damage, cell apoptosis and glycolysis, respectively. This study aims to explore the association between expression of hOGG1, VDAC1, HK-2 and cervical carcinoma.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2010 PMID: 20846459 PMCID: PMC2949824 DOI: 10.1186/1756-9966-29-129
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Exp Clin Cancer Res ISSN: 0392-9078
Figure 1The expression of hOGG1, VDAC1, HK-2 was displayed by figure a,b,c,d,e,f in turn, figure a,c,e were representative of negative expression, while figure b,d,f were indicative of positive expression, respectively.
Distribution of expression of hOGG1, VDAC1, HK-2 in control and case
| groups | n | hOGG1 | VDAC1 | HK-2 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | + | +% | - | + | +% | - | + | +% | ||
| Control | 20 | 17 | 3 | 15.0 | 5 | 15 | 75.0 | 12 | 8 | 40.0 |
| Case | 45 | 10 | 35 | 77.8 | 5 | 40 | 88.9 | 10 | 35 | 77.8 |
| total | 65 | 27 | 38 | 58.5 | 10 | 55 | 84.6 | 22 | 43 | 66.2 |
| 22.47 | 1.12 | 8.83 | ||||||||
| 0.000 | 0.289 | 0.003 | ||||||||
Note: P value of χis indicative of result of comparison between control and Cases, When P value is below standard of 0.05, the level of difference is significant.
Figure 2Distribution of expression of hOGG1, VDAC1, HK-2 in control and case.
Expression of hOGG1, VDAC1, HK-2 in classified cervical biopsy samples
| hOGG1 | VDAC1 | HK-2 | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | + | +% | - | + | +% | - | + | +% | |
| Control | 17 | 3 | 15.0 | 5 | 15 | 75.0 | 12 | 8 | 40.0 |
| MCC | 6 | 9 | 60.0 | 1 | 14 | 93.3 | 4 | 11 | 73.3 |
| ICC | 3 | 14 | 82.4 | 3 | 14 | 82.4 | 2 | 15 | 88.2 |
| SCC | 1 | 12 | 92.3 | 1 | 12 | 92.3 | 4 | 9 | 69.2 |
| 23.295 | 1.171 | 5.207 | |||||||
| 0.000 | 0.279 | 0.023 | |||||||
Note: MCC, ICC and SCC were explained in abbreviations, Linear χwas used to analyze trend of expression from control, MCC, ICC to SCC in order. When P < 0.05, the trend is significant.
Figure 3Expression of hOGG1, VDAC1, HK-2 in classified cervical biopsy samples.
The consistency level of expression of hOGG1, VDAC1, HK-2 in cervical samples
| VDAC1 | HK-2 | HK-2 | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | + | - | + | - | + | ||||
| hOGG1 | - | 5 | 22 | 14 | 13 | VDAC1 | - | 5 | 4 |
| + | 5 | 33 | 8 | 30 | + | 17 | 39 | ||
| 9.48 | 0.76 | 6.86 | |||||||
| 0.002 | 0.383 | 0.007 | |||||||
| 0.059 | 0.316 | 0.157 | |||||||
Note: Pair χor McNemarχis used to analyze consistency level commonly, When P < 0.05, the consistency level is not significant. Similarly, When Kappa < 0.45, indicating a low consistency level.
Relationship between expression degree of hOGG1, VDAC1, HK-2 and pathology types
| hOGG1 | VDAC1 | HK-2 | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | ± | + | ++ | - | ± | + | ++ | - | ± | + | ++ | |
| Control | 17 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 10 | 4 | 12 | 4 | 4 | 0 |
| MCC | 6 | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 7 | 7 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 2 |
| ICC | 3 | 0 | 7 | 7 | 3 | 3 | 7 | 4 | 2 | 5 | 9 | 1 |
| SCC | 1 | 1 | 7 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 7 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 1 |
| 33.54 | 0.049 | 8.358 | ||||||||||
| 0.000 | 0.825 | 0.004 | ||||||||||
Note: The χwas used to analyze the bidirectional trend of hOGG1, VDAC1 and HK-2, When P < 0.05, the trend was significant.