| Literature DB >> 20846415 |
Milagros Vargas1, Carlos Montero, Dunia Sánchez, Danny Pérez, Mario Valdés, Aymé Alfonso, Marisdania Joglar, Héctor Machado, Elsa Rodríguez, Luis Méndez, Ricardo Lleonart, Marisela Suárez, Erlinda Fernández, Mario P Estrada, Alina Rodríguez-Mallón, Omar Farnós.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The cattle tick, Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus, affects livestock production in many regions of the world. Up to now, the widespread use of chemical acaricides has led to the selection of acaricide-resistant ticks and to environmental contamination. Gavacplus is a subunit vaccine based on the recombinant Bm86 tick antigen expressed in yeast, capable to control infestations of R. microplus under controlled and production conditions. The vaccine constitutes the core element of broad control programs against this ectoparasite, in which acquired immunity in cattle to Bm86 is combined with a rational use of acaricides. At present, the conventional vaccine scheme consists of three doses that should be administered at weeks 0, 4 and 7, followed by a booster every six months.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2010 PMID: 20846415 PMCID: PMC2949828 DOI: 10.1186/1746-6148-6-43
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Vet Res ISSN: 1746-6148 Impact factor: 2.741
Figure 1Geometric mean of antibody titers against Bm86 determined by ELISA. At week 0 specific antibodies to Bm86 were not detected. A Friedman's test was employed at each time point for comparison of GMT. No statistical differences were found when the three immunization schemes were compared. Standard deviation bars in the positive sense are indicated.
Figure 2Average values of tick weight (A) and weight of eggs laid by an individual tick (B) measured at the beginning and at week 27 of the experiment. After vaccination, these variables showed a statistically significant reduction in the three schemes assayed (indicated with an asterisk at week 27), according to a Mann-Whitney's test with p < 0.05. Mean values measured from ticks engorged on unvaccinated animals did not show a significant variation. Standard deviation bars in the positive sense are indicated.
Average weight of engorging female ticks detached from immunized cattle.
| Average weight (in mg) of engorging females [95% confidence interval] | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 202 [183-220]a | 215 [197-229]a | 189 [167-201]a |
| 4 | 178 [127-224]a | 186 [125 -285]a | 146 [121-152]a |
| 7 | 169 [141-192]a | 170 [157-196]a | 150 [138-166]a |
| 10 | 161 [152-173]a | 175 [163-192]a | 179 [161-194]a |
| 16 | 174 [170-191]a | 176 [136-202]a | 187 [168-201]a |
| 20 | 171 [156-187]a | 181 [171-188]a | 175 [160-192]a |
| 27 | 129 [117-141]a | 145 [141-157]a | 138 [126-144]a |
Identical letters within the same row indicate that no statistically significant differences were found when the three schemes were compared. A Friedman's test was employed.
Mean values of normalized weight of eggs laid from ticks engorged on vaccinated animals.
| Mean weight (in mg) of eggs laid by individual ticks [confidence interval 95%] | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 525 [385-613]a | 512 [477-585]a | 548 [512-604]a |
| 7 | 456 [413-503]a | 493 [432-556]a | 475 [415-542]a |
| 10 | 421 [385-443]a | 435 [384-485]a | 463 [448-509]a |
| 16 | 480 [464-509]a | 489 [371-576]a | 498 [472-523]a |
| 20 | 448 [401-470]a | 442 [374-459]a | 449 [395-512]a |
| 27 | 425 [372-475]a | 415 [375-491]a | 440 [396-479]a |
Identical letters within the same row indicate that no statistically significant differences were found when the three schemes were compared. A Friedman test was used for comparison.
Figure 3Ticks detached from cattle immunized at weeks 0 and 4 were visibly damaged showing a characteristic dark-red/yellow color and a dehydrated appearance.
Percentage of eggs that hatched determined from ticks engorged on vaccinated cattle before and after immunizations.
| Medians of hatchability (%) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Immunization scheme | 0, 4, 7 | 0, 4 | 0, 7 |
| Before immunization | 96.77 | 96.10 | 94.89 |
| After immunization | 83.16 | 83.14 | 90.71* |
| Reduction (%) | 13.61 | 12.96 | 4.18* |
*Indicates a statistically significant difference (p < 0.05) with respect to the groups immunized following the 0, 4, 7 and the 0, 4 schemes.
Figure 4Average weight of eggs laid by ticks engorged on groups of cattle immunized at weeks 0 and 4, showing anti-Bm86 antibody titers ranging from 1:640 to 1:81920. Animals included in the comparison were randomly selected from vaccinated and unvaccinated animals. The mean weight of eggs laid (black lines), confidence interval for 95% (grey squares) and standard deviation bars (in both senses) are indicated. A statistically significant difference (Friedman's test, indicated with an asterisk) was found between the negative control group and vaccinated animals. n: indicates the number of bovines that were grouped by antibody titers as indicated in the abscise axis.