BACKGROUND: Imatinib is an effective tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) for patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in chronic phase (CP). Although some patients may fail on therapy with imatinib, effective salvage therapy is available with second-generation TKIs. Current measurement of efficacy for each therapy is judged by its individual impact on overall survival and event-free survival (EFS). METHODS: In total, 586 patients with CML in CP who received imatinib were included in this analysis in 2 cohorts: imatinib as front-line therapy (n = 281) or after failure on interferon-α (IFN-α) (n = 305). By accounting for successful salvage treatment (ie, regain of complete cytogenetic response), the current EFS (CEFS) rate was calculated to obtain a more accurate impression of the outcome of patients with CML who received treatment with sequential TKIs. RESULTS: For patients who received imatinib after failing on IFN-α, the 7-year EFS rate was 61%, whereas the CEFS rate was 69%. The 7-year EFS rate for patients who received imatinib as initial therapy was 81% compared with a 7-year CEFS rate of 88%. CONCLUSIONS: CEFS provided a more accurate representation of the outcome of patients with CML in CP. These patients may frequently be treated successfully with subsequent TKIs after experiencing failure on the first TKI.
BACKGROUND:Imatinib is an effective tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) for patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in chronic phase (CP). Although some patients may fail on therapy with imatinib, effective salvage therapy is available with second-generation TKIs. Current measurement of efficacy for each therapy is judged by its individual impact on overall survival and event-free survival (EFS). METHODS: In total, 586 patients with CML in CP who received imatinib were included in this analysis in 2 cohorts: imatinib as front-line therapy (n = 281) or after failure on interferon-α (IFN-α) (n = 305). By accounting for successful salvage treatment (ie, regain of complete cytogenetic response), the current EFS (CEFS) rate was calculated to obtain a more accurate impression of the outcome of patients with CML who received treatment with sequential TKIs. RESULTS: For patients who received imatinib after failing on IFN-α, the 7-year EFS rate was 61%, whereas the CEFS rate was 69%. The 7-year EFS rate for patients who received imatinib as initial therapy was 81% compared with a 7-year CEFS rate of 88%. CONCLUSIONS: CEFS provided a more accurate representation of the outcome of patients with CML in CP. These patients may frequently be treated successfully with subsequent TKIs after experiencing failure on the first TKI.
Authors: F Guilhot; C Chastang; M Michallet; A Guerci; J L Harousseau; F Maloisel; R Bouabdallah; D Guyotat; N Cheron; F Nicolini; J F Abgrall; J Tanzer Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1997-07-24 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: C Craddock; R M Szydlo; J P Klein; F Dazzi; E Olavarria; F van Rhee; C Pocock; K Cwynarski; J F Apperley; J M Goldman Journal: Blood Date: 2000-07-01 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Hagop Kantarjian; Ricardo Pasquini; Vincent Lévy; Saengsuree Jootar; Jerzy Holowiecki; Nelson Hamerschlak; Timothy Hughes; Eric Bleickardt; David Dejardin; Jorge Cortes; Neil P Shah Journal: Cancer Date: 2009-09-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Neil P Shah; Hagop M Kantarjian; Dong-Wook Kim; Delphine Réa; Pedro E Dorlhiac-Llacer; Jorge H Milone; Jorge Vela-Ojeda; Richard T Silver; H Jean Khoury; Aude Charbonnier; Nina Khoroshko; Ronald L Paquette; Michael Deininger; Robert H Collins; Irma Otero; Timothy Hughes; Eric Bleickardt; Lewis Strauss; Stephen Francis; Andreas Hochhaus Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2008-06-09 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Hagop M Kantarjian; Moshe Talpaz; Susan O'Brien; Terry L Smith; Francis J Giles; Stefan Faderl; Deborah A Thomas; Guillermo Garcia-Manero; Jean-Pierre J Issa; Michael Andreeff; Steven M Kornblau; Charles Koller; Milosav Beran; Michael Keating; Mary Beth Rios; Jenny Shan; Debra Resta; Renaud Capdeville; Kimberly Hayes; Maher Albitar; Emil J Freireich; Jorge E Cortes Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2002-07 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Hagop M Kantarjian; Susan O'Brien; Jorge E Cortes; Jianqin Shan; Francis J Giles; Mary Beth Rios; Stefan H Faderl; William G Wierda; Alessandra Ferrajoli; Srdan Verstovsek; Michael J Keating; Emil J Freireich; Moshe Talpaz Journal: Cancer Date: 2003-02-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Jorge E Cortes; Hagop M Kantarjian; Stuart L Goldberg; Bayard L Powell; Francis J Giles; Meir Wetzler; Luke Akard; John M Burke; Robert Kerr; Mansoor Saleh; August Salvado; Karen McDougall; Maher Albitar; Jerald Radich Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2009-08-31 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Joshua F Zeidner; Marianna Zahurak; Gary L Rosner; Christopher D Gocke; Richard J Jones; B Douglas Smith Journal: Leuk Lymphoma Date: 2014-06-16
Authors: Tomáš Pavlík; Eva Janoušová; Zdeněk Pospíšil; Jan Mužík; Daniela Záčková; Zdeněk Ráčil; Hana Klamová; Petr Cetkovský; Marek Trněný; Jiří Mayer; Ladislav Dušek Journal: BMC Med Res Methodol Date: 2011-10-11 Impact factor: 4.615