BACKGROUND: In patients with chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CP-CML), imatinib resistance is of increasing importance. Imatinib dose escalation was the main treatment option before dasatinib, which has 325-fold more potent inhibition than imatinib against unmutated Bcr-Abl in vitro. Data with a minimum of 2 years of follow-up were available for the current study of dasatinib and high-dose imatinib in CP-CML resistant to imatinib at daily doses from 400 mg to 600 mg. METHODS: A phase 2, open-label study was initiated of 150 patients with imatinib-resistant CP-CML who were randomized (2:1) to receive either dasatinib 70 mg twice daily (n=101) or high-dose imatinib 800 mg (400 mg twice daily; n=49). RESULTS: At a minimum follow-up of 2 years, dasatinib demonstrated higher rates of complete hematologic response (93% vs 82%; P=.034), major cytogenetic response (MCyR) (53% vs 33%; P=.017), and complete cytogenetic response (44% vs 18%; P=.0025). At 18 months, the MCyR was maintained in 90% of patients on the dasatinib arm and in 74% of patients on the high-dose imatinib arm. Major molecular response rates also were more frequent with dasatinib than with high-dose imatinib (29% vs 12%; P=.028). The estimated progression-free survival also favored dasatinib (unstratified log-rank test; P=.0012). CONCLUSIONS: After 2 years of follow-up, dasatinib demonstrated durable responses and improved response and progression-free survival rates relative to high-dose imatinib. Copyright (c) 2009 American Cancer Society.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: In patients with chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CP-CML), imatinib resistance is of increasing importance. Imatinib dose escalation was the main treatment option before dasatinib, which has 325-fold more potent inhibition than imatinib against unmutated Bcr-Abl in vitro. Data with a minimum of 2 years of follow-up were available for the current study of dasatinib and high-dose imatinib in CP-CML resistant to imatinib at daily doses from 400 mg to 600 mg. METHODS: A phase 2, open-label study was initiated of 150 patients with imatinib-resistant CP-CML who were randomized (2:1) to receive either dasatinib 70 mg twice daily (n=101) or high-dose imatinib 800 mg (400 mg twice daily; n=49). RESULTS: At a minimum follow-up of 2 years, dasatinib demonstrated higher rates of complete hematologic response (93% vs 82%; P=.034), major cytogenetic response (MCyR) (53% vs 33%; P=.017), and complete cytogenetic response (44% vs 18%; P=.0025). At 18 months, the MCyR was maintained in 90% of patients on the dasatinib arm and in 74% of patients on the high-dose imatinib arm. Major molecular response rates also were more frequent with dasatinib than with high-dose imatinib (29% vs 12%; P=.028). The estimated progression-free survival also favored dasatinib (unstratified log-rank test; P=.0012). CONCLUSIONS: After 2 years of follow-up, dasatinib demonstrated durable responses and improved response and progression-free survival rates relative to high-dose imatinib. Copyright (c) 2009 American Cancer Society.
Authors: Moshe Talpaz; Neil P Shah; Hagop Kantarjian; Nicholas Donato; John Nicoll; Ron Paquette; Jorge Cortes; Susan O'Brien; Claude Nicaise; Eric Bleickardt; M Anne Blackwood-Chirchir; Vishwanath Iyer; Tai-Tsang Chen; Fei Huang; Arthur P Decillis; Charles L Sawyers Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2006-06-15 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Neil P Shah; Hagop M Kantarjian; Dong-Wook Kim; Delphine Réa; Pedro E Dorlhiac-Llacer; Jorge H Milone; Jorge Vela-Ojeda; Richard T Silver; H Jean Khoury; Aude Charbonnier; Nina Khoroshko; Ronald L Paquette; Michael Deininger; Robert H Collins; Irma Otero; Timothy Hughes; Eric Bleickardt; Lewis Strauss; Stephen Francis; Andreas Hochhaus Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2008-06-09 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Timothy Hughes; Michael Deininger; Andreas Hochhaus; Susan Branford; Jerald Radich; Jaspal Kaeda; Michele Baccarani; Jorge Cortes; Nicholas C P Cross; Brian J Druker; Jean Gabert; David Grimwade; Rüdiger Hehlmann; Suzanne Kamel-Reid; Jeffrey H Lipton; Janina Longtine; Giovanni Martinelli; Giuseppe Saglio; Simona Soverini; Wendy Stock; John M Goldman Journal: Blood Date: 2006-03-07 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Tim P Hughes; Jaspal Kaeda; Susan Branford; Zbigniew Rudzki; Andreas Hochhaus; Martee L Hensley; Insa Gathmann; Ann E Bolton; Iris C van Hoomissen; John M Goldman; Jerald P Radich Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2003-10-09 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Jeffrey A Zonder; Pamela Pemberton; Helen Brandt; Anwar N Mohamed; Charles A Schiffer Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2003-06 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Thomas O'Hare; Denise K Walters; Eric P Stoffregen; Taiping Jia; Paul W Manley; Jürgen Mestan; Sandra W Cowan-Jacob; Francis Y Lee; Michael C Heinrich; Michael W N Deininger; Brian J Druker Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2005-06-01 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Koji Sasaki; Hagop M Kantarjian; Preetesh Jain; Elias J Jabbour; Farhad Ravandi; Marina Konopleva; Gautam Borthakur; Koichi Takahashi; Naveen Pemmaraju; Naval Daver; Sherry A Pierce; Susan M O'Brien; Jorge E Cortes Journal: Cancer Date: 2015-10-19 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Jorge E Cortes; Hagop M Kantarjian; Tim H Brümmendorf; Dong-Wook Kim; Anna G Turkina; Zhi-Xiang Shen; Ricardo Pasquini; H Jean Khoury; Steven Arkin; Angela Volkert; Nadine Besson; Richat Abbas; Junyuan Wang; Eric Leip; Carlo Gambacorti-Passerini Journal: Blood Date: 2011-08-24 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Jerald P Radich; Kenneth J Kopecky; Frederick R Appelbaum; Suzanne Kamel-Reid; Wendy Stock; Greg Malnassy; Elisabeth Paietta; Martha Wadleigh; Richard A Larson; Peter Emanuel; Martin Tallman; Jeff Lipton; A Robert Turner; Michael Deininger; Brian J Druker Journal: Blood Date: 2012-08-22 Impact factor: 22.113