OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the scalability and reliability of Qualidem, a quality of life observation instrument rated by professional caregivers of persons with mild to very severe dementia living in residential settings. METHOD: Data from four field surveys in the Netherlands were used. The instrument consists of nine subscales for mild to severe dementia; of which six can be applied in very severe dementia. The Mokken scaling model was used to compute scalability and reliability coefficients for each subscale and dementia group. RESULTS: Seven hundred fifty nine persons with mild to severe dementia and 214 persons with very severe dementia residing in 36 nursing homes and 4 homes for the elderly were included. In general, the subscales for the mild to severely demented group were scalable and (moderate) sufficiently reliable; the results confirmed the results of previous research to develop Qualidem. For the very severe demented group, four out of six subscales were scalable (Care relationship, H = 0.56; Positive affect, H = 0.55; Restless tense behavior, H = 0.42; and Social isolation, H = 0.34); they were also sufficiently reliable to measure quality of life (0.57 ≤ ρ ≤ 0.82). From the other two measured subscales, Social relations was considered not scalable (H = 0.26) and Negative affect was scalable (H = 0.36), but insufficiently reliable (ρ = 0.40). CONCLUSION: Qualidem is an easy to administer and overall moderately sufficient reliable rating scale that provides a quality of life profile of persons with mild to even very severe dementia living in residential settings.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the scalability and reliability of Qualidem, a quality of life observation instrument rated by professional caregivers of persons with mild to very severe dementia living in residential settings. METHOD: Data from four field surveys in the Netherlands were used. The instrument consists of nine subscales for mild to severe dementia; of which six can be applied in very severe dementia. The Mokken scaling model was used to compute scalability and reliability coefficients for each subscale and dementia group. RESULTS: Seven hundred fifty nine persons with mild to severe dementia and 214 persons with very severe dementia residing in 36 nursing homes and 4 homes for the elderly were included. In general, the subscales for the mild to severely demented group were scalable and (moderate) sufficiently reliable; the results confirmed the results of previous research to develop Qualidem. For the very severe demented group, four out of six subscales were scalable (Care relationship, H = 0.56; Positive affect, H = 0.55; Restless tense behavior, H = 0.42; and Social isolation, H = 0.34); they were also sufficiently reliable to measure quality of life (0.57 ≤ ρ ≤ 0.82). From the other two measured subscales, Social relations was considered not scalable (H = 0.26) and Negative affect was scalable (H = 0.36), but insufficiently reliable (ρ = 0.40). CONCLUSION: Qualidem is an easy to administer and overall moderately sufficient reliable rating scale that provides a quality of life profile of persons with mild to even very severe dementia living in residential settings.
Authors: Maartje S Klapwijk; Monique A A Caljouw; Marjoleine J C Pieper; Jenny T van der Steen; Wilco P Achterberg Journal: Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord Date: 2016-09-27 Impact factor: 2.959
Authors: Laura N Gitlin; Nancy Hodgson; Catherine Verrier Piersol; Edward Hess; Walter W Hauck Journal: Am J Geriatr Psychiatry Date: 2013-07-25 Impact factor: 4.105
Authors: Johannes Gräske; Hilde Verbeek; Paul Gellert; Thomas Fischer; Adelheid Kuhlmey; Karin Wolf-Ostermann Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2013-08-22 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Martin Nikolaus Dichter; Olga Dortmann; Margareta Halek; Gabriele Meyer; Daniela Holle; Johanna Nordheim; Sabine Bartholomeyczik Journal: Health Qual Life Outcomes Date: 2013-06-05 Impact factor: 3.186
Authors: Roxane Anthea Francesca Weijenberg; Frank Lobbezoo; Dirk Lucas Knol; Jori Tomassen; Erik Johan Anton Scherder Journal: BMC Neurol Date: 2013-03-16 Impact factor: 2.474
Authors: Geertje van de Ven; Irena Draskovic; Eddy M M Adang; Rogier Donders; Sytse U Zuidema; Raymond T C M Koopmans; Myrra J F J Vernooij-Dassen Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-07-02 Impact factor: 3.240