Literature DB >> 20843459

[REMEEX® system for the treatment of male urinary stress incontinence: our experience].

J D Jiménez Parra1, J L Cebrián Lostal, A Hualde Alfaro, S Alvarez Bandrés, D García García, L Torres Varas, J M Jiménez Calvo, A S González de Garibay.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: We evaluate the effectiveness of REMEEX® (readjustable sling) for the treatment of male urinary stress incontinence (SUI). MATERIALS AND
METHOD: Between February 2007 and December 2009, 14 male patients with mild to severe SUI were operated with the use of REMEEX® system. The origin of incontinence was radical open prostatectomy (n=9), laparoscopic prostatectomy (n=4) and TUR (n=1). We evaluate postoperatively complications in three groups: intraoperatively, early complications (before 1 month) and late complications (after 1 month). Follow up was done at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after intervention.
RESULTS: The mean age was 68,5 years (range: 62-71). The average follow-up time was 18,6 months (range: 10,1-35,2). The mean of readjustment was 3,7 (range: 1-6). Twelve patients were readjusted during the early period (24-72h after intervention). The mesh was removed in 3 cases (21,4%) owing to infection in one and the others because patients didn't want more system readjustment. There were four (28,5%) intraoperative bladder perforations. The early complication more frequent was acute urinary retention with five cases (35,7%). To the year of follow-up 41,7% of the patients are totally continent (5/12) and 33,3% presents light urinary incontinence (4/12).
CONCLUSIONS: The REMEEX® system for the treatment of male SUI presents (in our experience) a 75% of good results (continent patients or patients with light urinary incontinence) at the year of follow-up with a high rate of light complications. Readjustment are frequent at the first six months after intervention and it's necessary an intense follow-up. We need more studies that evaluate the long-term efficiency of this system.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20843459

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Actas Urol Esp        ISSN: 0210-4806            Impact factor:   0.994


  6 in total

1.  Systematic review and meta-analysis comparing Adjustable Transobturator Male System (ATOMS) and male Readjustment Mechanical External (REMEEX) system for post-prostatectomy incontinence.

Authors:  Javier C Angulo; Sonia Ruiz; Martín Lozano; Ignacio Arance; Miguel Virseda; David Lora
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2020-06-11       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Effectiveness of the Remeex system™ in Colombian women with recurrent stress urinary incontinence or intrinsic sphincter deficiency.

Authors:  Mauricio Plata; Daniela Robledo; Alejandra Bravo-Balado; Juan Carlos Castaño; Catalina Osorio; Milton Salazar; Juan Guillermo Velásquez; Carlos Gustavo Trujillo; Juan Ignacio Caicedo; Juan Guillermo Cataño
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2018-03-03       Impact factor: 2.894

3.  Male stress urinary incontinence: a review of surgical treatment options and outcomes.

Authors:  Landon Trost; Daniel S Elliott
Journal:  Adv Urol       Date:  2012-05-08

Review 4.  The artificial urinary sphincter and male sling for postprostatectomy incontinence: Which patient should get which procedure?

Authors:  Craig V Comiter; Amy D Dobberfuhl
Journal:  Investig Clin Urol       Date:  2016-01-11

Review 5.  Adjustable sling for the treatment of post-prostatectomy urinary incontinence: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Laercio Antonio da Silva; Rogério Simonetti; Edina Mariko Koga da Silva
Journal:  Einstein (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2019-09-23

6.  Remeex® System Effectiveness in Male Patients with Stress Urinary Incontinence.

Authors:  Gerardo-Alfonso Márquez-Sánchez; Bárbara-Yolanda Padilla-Fernández; Miguel Perán-Teruel; Pedro Navalón-Verdejo; Sebastián Valverde-Martínez; Magaly-Teresa Márquez-Sánchez; Javier Flores-Fraile; María-Fernanda Lorenzo-Gómez
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 4.241

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.