Literature DB >> 20842695

Mouse Rad9b is essential for embryonic development and promotes resistance to DNA damage.

Corinne Leloup1, Kevin M Hopkins, Xiangyuan Wang, Aiping Zhu, Debra J Wolgemuth, Howard B Lieberman.   

Abstract

RAD9 participates in promoting resistance to DNA damage, cell cycle checkpoint control, DNA repair, apoptosis, embryogenesis, and regulation of transcription. A paralogue of RAD9 (named RAD9B) has been identified. To define the function of mouse Rad9b (Mrad9b), embryonic stem (ES) cells with a targeted gene deletion were constructed and used to generate Mrad9b mutant mice. Mrad9b(-/-) embryos are resorbed after E7.5 while some of the heterozygotes die between E12.5 and a few days after birth. Mrad9b is expressed in embryonic brain and Mrad9b(+/-) embryos exhibit abnormal neural tube closure. Mrad9b(-/-) mouse embryonic fibroblasts are not viable. Mrad9b(-/-) ES cells are more sensitive to gamma rays and mitomycin C than Mrad9b(+/+) controls, but show normal gamma-ray-induced G2/M checkpoint control. There is no evidence of spontaneous genomic instability in Mrad9b(-/-) cells. Our findings thus indicate that Mrad9b is essential for embryonic development and mediates resistance to certain DNA damaging agents.
© 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20842695      PMCID: PMC2967720          DOI: 10.1002/dvdy.22415

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dev Dyn        ISSN: 1058-8388            Impact factor:   3.780


  57 in total

1.  Relative toxicities of DNA cross-links and monoadducts: new insights from studies of decarbamoyl mitomycin C and mitomycin C.

Authors:  Yolanda Palom; Gopinatha Suresh Kumar; Li-Qian Tang; Manuel M Paz; Steven M Musser; Sara Rockwell; Maria Tomasz
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 3.739

Review 2.  Cell cycle checkpoint signaling: cell cycle arrest versus apoptosis.

Authors:  J A Pietenpol; Z A Stewart
Journal:  Toxicology       Date:  2002-12-27       Impact factor: 4.221

Review 3.  DNA repair in mammalian cells: Base excision repair: the long and short of it.

Authors:  A B Robertson; A Klungland; T Rognes; I Leiros
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 9.261

4.  Developmental defects and male sterility in mice lacking the ubiquitin-like DNA repair gene mHR23B.

Authors:  Jessica M Y Ng; Harry Vrieling; Kaoru Sugasawa; Marja P Ooms; J Anton Grootegoed; Jan T M Vreeburg; Pim Visser; Rudolph B Beems; Theo G M F Gorgels; Fumio Hanaoka; Jan H J Hoeijmakers; Gijsbertus T J van der Horst
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 4.272

Review 5.  Repair of DNA interstrand crosslinks: molecular mechanisms and clinical relevance.

Authors:  P J McHugh; V J Spanswick; J A Hartley
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 41.316

6.  Targeted disruption of the Nijmegen breakage syndrome gene NBS1 leads to early embryonic lethality in mice.

Authors:  J Zhu; S Petersen; L Tessarollo; A Nussenzweig
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2001-01-23       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 7.  The in vitro micronucleus technique.

Authors:  M Fenech
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2000-11-20       Impact factor: 2.433

8.  Inactivation of mouse Hus1 results in genomic instability and impaired responses to genotoxic stress.

Authors:  R S Weiss; T Enoch; P Leder
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2000-08-01       Impact factor: 11.361

9.  Deficient nonhomologous end-joining activity in cell-free extracts from Brca1-null fibroblasts.

Authors:  Qing Zhong; Thomas G Boyer; Phang-Lang Chen; Wen-Hwa Lee
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2002-07-15       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 10.  Transcription-coupled DNA repair: two decades of progress and surprises.

Authors:  Philip C Hanawalt; Graciela Spivak
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 94.444

View more
  4 in total

1.  Clamping down on mammalian meiosis.

Authors:  Amy M Lyndaker; Ana Vasileva; Debra J Wolgemuth; Robert S Weiss; Howard B Lieberman
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2013-08-26       Impact factor: 4.534

Review 2.  Micronutrient imbalance and common phenotypes in neural tube defects.

Authors:  Anneke Dixie Kakebeen; Lee Niswander
Journal:  Genesis       Date:  2021-10-19       Impact factor: 2.487

3.  The CDK-PLK1 axis targets the DNA damage checkpoint sensor protein RAD9 to promote cell proliferation and tolerance to genotoxic stress.

Authors:  Takeshi Wakida; Masae Ikura; Kenji Kuriya; Shinji Ito; Yoshiharu Shiroiwa; Toshiyuki Habu; Takuo Kawamoto; Katsuzumi Okumura; Tsuyoshi Ikura; Kanji Furuya
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2017-12-19       Impact factor: 8.140

4.  Loss of RAD9B impairs early neural development and contributes to the risk for human spina bifida.

Authors:  Xuanye Cao; Tian Tian; John W Steele; Robert M Cabrera; Vanessa Aguiar-Pulido; Shruti Wadhwa; Nikitha Bhavani; Patrick Bi; Nick H Gargurevich; Ethan N Hoffman; Chun-Quan Cai; Nicholas J Marini; Wei Yang; Gary M Shaw; Margaret E Ross; Richard H Finnell; Yunping Lei
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  2020-01-16       Impact factor: 4.700

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.