Literature DB >> 20842083

Effect of gender on fatigue and recovery following maximal intensity repeated sprint performance.

C M Laurent1, J M Green, P A Bishop, J Sjökvist, R E Schumacker, M T Richardson, M Curtner-Smith.   

Abstract

AIM: This study investigated the effects of gender on repeated, maximal-intensity intermittent sprint exercise following variable day-to-day recovery periods.
METHODS: Sixteen volunteers (8 men, 8 women) performed four trials of high-intensity intermittent sprint exercise consisting of three bouts of eight 30 m sprints (total of 24 sprints). Following completion of the baseline trial, in repeated-measures design, participants were assigned, in counter-balanced order, variable recovery periods of 24, 48, and 72 h whereupon they repeated an identical exercise trial.
RESULTS: Results from a series of 4 (trial) x 3 (bout) repeated measures ANOVAs revealed men produced significantly (P < 0.01) faster times throughout all bouts and trials of repeated sprint exercise. Additionally, women exhibited significantly lower (P < 0.05) blood lactate concentration and significantly lower (P < 0.05) decrement in performance, indicating increased resistance to fatigue during repeated exercise sessions. There were no significant differences (P > 0.05) between genders for heart rate or rating of perceived exertion during or following trials. There were no significant differences for overall sprint performance within either gender among trials.
CONCLUSION: These results indicate men, while able to produce higher absolute power outputs (i.e., lower sprint time), demonstrate higher decrement scores within a trial compared to women, thus suggesting women may recover faster and fatigue less. Also, gender differences affecting recovery within in a trial were observed to be diminished between trials (i.e., day-to-day recovery) of maximal intermittent sprint work evidenced by the observed stability of performance between trials following various recovery durations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20842083

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sports Med Phys Fitness        ISSN: 0022-4707            Impact factor:   1.637


  15 in total

1.  Mechanical work accounts for sex differences in fatigue during repeated sprints.

Authors:  François Billaut; David J Bishop
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2011-08-10       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  Sex-Related Differences in Self-Paced All Out High-Intensity Intermittent Cycling: Mechanical and Physiological Responses.

Authors:  Valéria L G Panissa; Ursula F Julio; Vanessa França; Fabio S Lira; Peter Hofmann; Monica Y Takito; Emerson Franchini
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2016-05-23       Impact factor: 2.988

3.  The reliability of the intermittent critical velocity test and assessment of critical rest interval in men and women.

Authors:  David H Fukuda; Abbie E Smith; Kristina L Kendall; Robert P Hetrick; Ryan L Hames; Joel T Cramer; Jeffrey R Stout
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2011-07-17       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 4.  The Relevance of Sex Differences in Performance Fatigability.

Authors:  Sandra K Hunter
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 5.411

5.  Sex differences in human fatigability: mechanisms and insight to physiological responses.

Authors:  S K Hunter
Journal:  Acta Physiol (Oxf)       Date:  2014-02-25       Impact factor: 6.311

6.  Practice day may be unnecessary prior to testing knee extensor strength in young healthy adults.

Authors:  Jamie E Hibbert; Anthony S Kulas; Patrick M Rider; Zachary J Domire
Journal:  Int Biomech       Date:  2020-12

7.  Responsiveness of the Countermovement Jump and Handgrip Strength to an Incremental Running Test in Endurance Athletes: Influence of Sex.

Authors:  Felipe García-Pinillos; Pedro Delgado-Floody; Cristian Martínez-Salazar; Pedro Á Latorre-Román
Journal:  J Hum Kinet       Date:  2018-03-23       Impact factor: 2.193

Review 8.  Sex differences in fatigability of dynamic contractions.

Authors:  Sandra K Hunter
Journal:  Exp Physiol       Date:  2015-11-17       Impact factor: 2.969

9.  Comparison of the Gauntlet Test With Standard Laboratory Measures of Aerobic Fitness.

Authors:  Marissa L Burnsed-Torres; Therese K Wichmann; Zachary S Clayton; Michael E Hahn
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 4.415

10.  Repeated Sprint Performance in Male and Female College Athletes Matched for VO2max Relative to Fat Free Mass.

Authors:  Amanda L Mageean; Ryan P Alexander; Constance M Mier
Journal:  Int J Exerc Sci       Date:  2011-10-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.