Literature DB >> 26440505

Sex differences in fatigability of dynamic contractions.

Sandra K Hunter1.   

Abstract

NEW
FINDINGS: What is the topic of this review? Women are usually less fatigable than men for isometric fatiguing contractions of similar intensity, but whether this occurs for dynamic tasks is less clear. This review presents evidence that the sex difference in muscle fatigue of repeated dynamic contractions is specific to the task requirements, including the velocity of shortening and the muscle group involved. What advances does it highlight? Contractile mechanisms are responsible for the sex differences in muscle fatigue for slow-velocity and low-load dynamic tasks. The variability of the sex difference in fatigability among dynamic tasks has implications for fatiguing contractions prescribed in training and rehabilitation to men and women. Women are usually less fatigable than men during single-limb isometric contractions, primarily because of sex-related differences in contractile mechanisms. It is less clear whether these sex differences in muscle fatigue occur for dynamic fatiguing tasks. This review highlights new findings that the sex difference in fatigability for dynamic shortening contractions with a single limb is dependent on the contraction velocity and the muscle group involved. Recent studies demonstrate that women are less fatigable than men for a dynamic task as follows: (i) the elbow-flexor muscles at slow- but not high-velocity contractions; and (ii) the knee-extensor muscles when muscle fatigue was quantified as a reduction in the maximal voluntary isometric contraction force after the dynamic fatiguing task. Contractile mechanisms are responsible for the sex difference in muscle fatigue of the dynamic contractions, with no evidence for a sex difference in the reduction in voluntary activation (i.e. central fatigue). Thus, these findings indicate that the sex difference in muscle fatigue of dynamic contractions is task specific. These data also challenge the assumption that men and women respond in a similar manner to training and rehabilitation that involve fatiguing contractions to overload the neuromuscular system. There is, however, a tremendous opportunity for conducting high-impact studies to gain insight into those factors that define the sex-based differences in muscle fatigue during dynamic tasks. Such studies can define the boundaries to human performance in both men and women during athletic endeavours, ergonomic tasks and rehabilitation.
© 2015 The Authors. Experimental Physiology © 2015 The Physiological Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26440505      PMCID: PMC5777316          DOI: 10.1113/EP085370

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Physiol        ISSN: 0958-0670            Impact factor:   2.969


  34 in total

1.  Supraspinal fatigue does not explain the sex difference in muscle fatigue of maximal contractions.

Authors:  Sandra K Hunter; Jane E Butler; Gabrielle Todd; Simon C Gandevia; Janet L Taylor
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2006-05-25

2.  Sex differences with aging in the fatigability of dynamic contractions.

Authors:  Tejin Yoon; Ryan Doyel; Claire Widule; Sandra K Hunter
Journal:  Exp Gerontol       Date:  2015-07-06       Impact factor: 4.032

3.  Exercise vasodilation is greater in women: contributions of nitric oxide synthase and cyclooxygenase.

Authors:  J Mikhail Kellawan; Rebecca E Johansson; John W Harrell; Joshua J Sebranek; Benjamin J Walker; Marlowe W Eldridge; William G Schrage
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2015-03-28       Impact factor: 3.078

4.  Sex Differences in Mechanisms of Recovery after Isometric and Dynamic Fatiguing Tasks.

Authors:  Jonathon Senefeld; Hugo M Pereira; Nicholas Elliott; Tejin Yoon; Sandra K Hunter
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 5.411

Review 5.  Skeletal muscle fatigue.

Authors:  Jane A Kent-Braun; Robert H Fitts; Anita Christie
Journal:  Compr Physiol       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 9.090

6.  Sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca2+ uptake and leak properties, and SERCA isoform expression, in type I and type II fibres of human skeletal muscle.

Authors:  C R Lamboley; R M Murphy; M J McKenna; G D Lamb
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2014-01-27       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  Sex differences in contractile properties and fatigue resistance of human skeletal muscle.

Authors:  Rob C I Wüst; Christopher I Morse; Arnold de Haan; David A Jones; Hans Degens
Journal:  Exp Physiol       Date:  2008-02-22       Impact factor: 2.969

8.  Sex differences in human skeletal muscle fatigue are eliminated under ischemic conditions.

Authors:  David W Russ; Jane A Kent-Braun
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2003-01-31

9.  Mechanisms of fatigue differ after low- and high-force fatiguing contractions in men and women.

Authors:  Tejin Yoon; Bonnie Schlinder Delap; Erin E Griffith; Sandra K Hunter
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 3.217

10.  Central fatigue explains sex differences in muscle fatigue and contralateral cross-over effects of maximal contractions.

Authors:  Peter G Martin; Jodie Rattey
Journal:  Pflugers Arch       Date:  2007-03-07       Impact factor: 3.657

View more
  37 in total

Review 1.  Performance Fatigability: Mechanisms and Task Specificity.

Authors:  Sandra K Hunter
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med       Date:  2018-07-02       Impact factor: 6.915

2.  Age differences in dynamic fatigability and variability of arm and leg muscles: Associations with physical function.

Authors:  Jonathon Senefeld; Tejin Yoon; Sandra K Hunter
Journal:  Exp Gerontol       Date:  2016-10-27       Impact factor: 4.032

3.  Rates of performance loss and neuromuscular activity in men and women during cycling: evidence for a common metabolic basis of muscle fatigue.

Authors:  Christopher W Sundberg; Sandra K Hunter; Matthew W Bundle
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2016-11-17

4.  Sex Differences in Mechanisms of Recovery after Isometric and Dynamic Fatiguing Tasks.

Authors:  Jonathon Senefeld; Hugo M Pereira; Nicholas Elliott; Tejin Yoon; Sandra K Hunter
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 5.411

Review 5.  The Relevance of Sex Differences in Performance Fatigability.

Authors:  Sandra K Hunter
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 5.411

6.  Exercise-induced quadriceps muscle fatigue in men and women: effects of arterial oxygen content and respiratory muscle work.

Authors:  Paolo B Dominelli; Yannick Molgat-Seon; Donald E G Griesdale; Carli M Peters; Jean-Sébastien Blouin; Mypinder Sekhon; Giulio S Dominelli; William R Henderson; Glen E Foster; Lee M Romer; Michael S Koehle; A William Sheel
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2017-06-19       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  Pharmacological attenuation of group III/IV muscle afferents improves endurance performance when oxygen delivery to locomotor muscles is preserved.

Authors:  Thomas J Hureau; Joshua C Weavil; Taylor S Thurston; Hsuan-Yu Wan; Jayson R Gifford; Jacob E Jessop; Michael J Buys; Russell S Richardson; Markus Amann
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2019-09-12

8.  Sex differences in neuromuscular function after repeated eccentric contractions of the knee extensor muscles.

Authors:  Andrea Lee; Jake Baxter; Claire Eischer; Matt Gage; Sandra Hunter; Tejin Yoon
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2017-04-21       Impact factor: 3.078

9.  Photobiomodulation (PBM) therapy at 904 nm mitigates effects of exercise-induced skeletal muscle fatigue in young women.

Authors:  Renata Luri Toma; Murilo Xavier Oliveira; Ana Cláudia Muniz Renno; E-Liisa Laakso
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2018-02-17       Impact factor: 3.161

10.  Muscle fatigue in response to low-load blood flow-restricted elbow-flexion exercise: are there any sex differences?

Authors:  Goncalo V Mendonca; Afonso Borges; Carolina Teodósio; Pedro Matos; Joana Correia; Carolina Vila-Chã; Pedro Mil-Homens; Pedro Pezarat-Correia
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2018-07-13       Impact factor: 3.078

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.