Literature DB >> 2084204

Factors affecting the long-term results of endodontic treatment.

U Sjogren1, B Hagglund, G Sundqvist, K Wing.   

Abstract

The influence of various factors that may affect the outcome of root canal therapy was evaluated in 356 patients 8 to 10 yr after the treatment. The results of treatment were directly dependent on the preoperative status of the pulp and periapical tissues. The rate of success for cases with vital or nonvital pulps but having no periapical radiolucency exceeded 96%, whereas only 86% of the cases with pulp necrosis and periapical radiolucency showed apical healing. The possibility of instrumenting the root canal to its full length and the level of root filling significantly affected the outcome of treatment. Of all of the periapical lesions present on previously root-filled teeth, only 62% healed after retreatment. The predictability from clinical and radiographic signs of the treatment-outcome in individual cases with preoperative periapical lesions cases was found to be low. Thus, factors which were not measured or identified may be critical to the outcome of endodontic treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2084204     DOI: 10.1016/S0099-2399(07)80180-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endod        ISSN: 0099-2399            Impact factor:   4.171


  183 in total

Review 1.  Impact of nickel-titanium instrumentation of the root canal on clinical outcomes: a focused review.

Authors:  Edgar Schäfer; Sebastian Bürklein
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2012-04-22       Impact factor: 2.634

2.  Comparison between two thermoplastic root canal obturation techniques regarding extrusion of root canal filling--a retrospective in vivo study.

Authors:  Christian Tennert; Ingo Lars Jungbäck; Karl-Thomas Wrbas
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2012-05-01       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Radiographic study of the problems and failures of endodontic treatment.

Authors:  Iftikhar Akbar
Journal:  Int J Health Sci (Qassim)       Date:  2015-04

4.  Apical pressure created during irrigation with the GentleWave™ system compared to conventional syringe irrigation.

Authors:  Markus Haapasalo; Ya Shen; Zhejun Wang; Ellen Park; Allison Curtis; Payal Patel; Prashanthi Vandrangi
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2015-10-26       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 5.  Magnification devices for endodontic therapy.

Authors:  Massimo Del Fabbro; Silvio Taschieri; Giovanni Lodi; Giuseppe Banfi; Roberto L Weinstein
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-12-09

6.  Blatant ignorance.

Authors:  B S Chong; A M Berman; G Billis; A M Quinn; C D Emery; G Di Filippo; H F Duncan; E Schäfer; N P Chandler
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2016-02-12       Impact factor: 1.626

7.  The Factors Responsible for Endodontic Treatment Failure in the Permanent Dentitions of the Patients Reported to the College of Dentistry, the University of Aljouf, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

Authors:  Azhar Iqbal
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2016-05-01

8.  The Comparative Efficacy of Different Files in The Removal of Different Sealers in Simulated Root Canal Retreatment- An In-vitro Study.

Authors:  Aruna Kanaparthy; Rosaiah Kanaparthy
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2016-05-01

Review 9.  Ability of new obturation materials to improve the seal of the root canal system: a review.

Authors:  Guo-Hua Li; Li-Na Niu; Wei Zhang; Mark Olsen; Gustavo De-Deus; Ashraf A Eid; Ji-Hua Chen; David H Pashley; Franklin R Tay
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2013-12-07       Impact factor: 8.947

10.  Technical quality of a matching-taper single-cone filling technique following rotary instrumentation compared with lateral compaction after manual preparation: a retrospective study.

Authors:  R Krug; G Krastl; M Jahreis
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2016-08-13       Impact factor: 3.573

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.