Literature DB >> 20841517

The impact of continuing professional development versus traditional continuing pharmacy education on pharmacy practice.

Karen J McConnell1, Carey L Newlon, Thomas Delate.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Institute of Medicine states that the new vision for continuing education (CE) for health-care professionals will be based on continuing professional development (CPD); however, information on the utility of CPD is lacking.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of CPD, compared with that of traditional continuing pharmacy education (CPE), on perceptions of factors related to pharmacy practice.
METHODS: This 10-month, nonblinded, randomized controlled study recruited licensed pharmacists employed at a health maintenance organization (HMO). After completing a basic CPD course, participants were randomized to the intervention or control group. The control group was instructed to continue with traditional CPE. The intervention group participants completed 3 CPD workshops and were instructed to utilize the CPD approach for their learning needs. At baseline and follow-up, all participants completed a study questionnaire on perceptions of their pharmacy practices. The outcome measures were comparisons on follow-up and changes from baseline to follow-up in responses to the study questionnaire.
RESULTS: One hundred pharmacists were enrolled. The intervention (n = 44, 7 lost to follow-up) and control (n = 47, 2 lost to follow-up) groups were similar at baseline. At follow-up, a higher percentage of intervention participants reported that they had better interactions with other health-care providers (always/frequently 32% vs 6%, respectively) and initiated practice/work changes (always/frequently 21% vs 0%, respectively) (both p < 0.01) as a result of their education activities. Compared with control participants at follow-up, intervention participants reported that their education activities improved patient care changes (46% vs 23%), professional knowledge (34% vs 6%), skills (48% vs 17%), and attitudes/values (43% to 11%) (all p < 0.05). However, intervention participants reported more often that time was a barrier to completing education activities (75% vs 32%, p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Pharmacists who participated in CPD reported more often that their perceptions of various aspects of their pharmacy practice improved as a result of their education activities compared with pharmacists who participated in traditional CPE.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20841517     DOI: 10.1345/aph.1P161

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Pharmacother        ISSN: 1060-0280            Impact factor:   3.154


  16 in total

1.  A continuous professional development process for first-year pharmacy students.

Authors:  Richard O'Brocta; Asim Abu-Baker; Parag Budukh; Mona Gandhi; Jill Lavigne; Christine Birnie
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2012-03-12       Impact factor: 2.047

2.  University-based continuing education for pharmacists.

Authors:  Theresa J Schindel; James P Kehrer; Nesé Yuksel; Christine A Hughes
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2012-03-12       Impact factor: 2.047

3.  Use of SMART learning objectives to introduce continuing professional development into the pharmacy curriculum.

Authors:  Toyin Tofade; Anand Khandoobhai; Kim Leadon
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2012-05-10       Impact factor: 2.047

4.  Report of the 2012-2013 professional affairs committee: tables of influence-is pharmacy hungry enough?

Authors:  Linda Garrelts Maclean; Gayle A Brazeau; Renae J Chesnut; Brian L Erstad; Kisha O Gant; Elizabeth P Pitman; Julie K Johnson; Timothy Musselman; Lynette R Bradley-Baker
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2013-12-16       Impact factor: 2.047

5.  The sustainability of improvements from continuing professional development in pharmacy practice and learning behaviors.

Authors:  Karen J McConnell; Thomas Delate; Carey L Newlon
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2015-04-25       Impact factor: 2.047

Review 6.  Forty Years of ACPE CPE Accreditation.

Authors:  Dimitra V Travlos; Jennifer L Baumgartner; Mike Rouse; Jeffrey W Wadelin; Peter H Vlasses
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 2.047

7.  The Report of the 2018-2019 Professional Affairs Standing Committee: The Role of Educators in Pharmacy Practice Transformation.

Authors:  Philip D Hall; Hannah Fish; Sarah McBane; Jeff Mercer; Cynthia Moreau; James Owen; Anne Policastri; Gail B Rattinger; Sneha Baxi Srivastava; Michael C Thomas; Lynette R Bradley-Baker
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 2.047

8.  Training on the use of a bespoke continuing professional development framework improves the quality of CPD records.

Authors:  Parastou Donyai; Angela M Alexander
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm       Date:  2015-09-28

9.  Education and Assessment of Pharmacists on the Use of the Drug Burden Index in Older Adults Using a Continuing Professional Development Education Method.

Authors:  Lisa Kouladjian; Timothy F Chen; Danijela Gnjidic; Sarah N Hilmer
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2016-05-25       Impact factor: 2.047

10.  Involvement of community pharmacists in continuing professional development (CPD): a baseline survey in Gondar, Northwest Ethiopia.

Authors:  Dessalegn Asmelashe Gelayee; Gashaw Binega Mekonnen; Mequanent Kassa Birarra
Journal:  Global Health       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 4.185

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.