Literature DB >> 20840774

Personality and the physician-patient relationship as predictors of quality of life of cardiac patients after rehabilitation.

Erik Farin1, Milena Meder.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Numerous studies document the influence of psychosocial variables on the course of coronary heart disease. This study examines the influence of personality traits (trait anger, cynicism) and aspects of the physician-patient relationship (promoting patient participation by the physician, active communication behavior of the patient, trust in the physician) on the health related quality of life (HRQOL) of cardiac patients after rehabilitation.
METHODS: N = 331 patients with chronic ischemic heart disease were surveyed using questionnaires at two time points (beginning and end of 3-weeks inpatient rehabilitation). In addition, characteristics of the disease and cardiac risk factors were provided by the physician. HRQOL was measured using a total of six scales and three instruments: SF-12, MacNew questionnaire, and SAQ. Hierarchical regression analyses were carried out to predict HRQOL after rehabilitation, in which the baseline values of HRQOL, sociodemographic variables, characteristics of the disease and risk factors, personality traits, and finally the aspects of the physician-patient relationship were included stepwise. As a number of variables were used for the regression models, multiple imputation was conducted.
RESULTS: The baseline values explain most of the variance (42%-60%). After controlling the baseline values, the sociodemographic variables explain up to 5% incremental variance of HRQOL, with income being the most important predictor. The characteristics of the disease and cardiac risk factors explain between 0.4% and 3.8% incremental variance, however, variance increase is often not significant. The personality traits added in the fourth step explain up to 2% additional variance; trait anger is a significant predictor of HRQOL in three of the six scales. The features of the physician-patient relationship included in the last step lead to a significant increase in explained variance (between 1.3% and 3.9%) for all six scales. In particular, the physician's promotion of patient participation has a significant influence. The overall explanation of variance for HRQOL is between 50% and 64%.
CONCLUSIONS: Low income, a high level of trait anger, and low patient participation are significant risk factors, even if a number of potential confounders are adjusted. Research is needed that shows which causal pathway low income functions on and what therapies in rehabilitation can mitigate the disadvantage of persons with a high level of trait anger. The providers should implement measures to actively integrate rehabilitation patients in treatment (e.g. encourage them to ask questions).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20840774      PMCID: PMC2949817          DOI: 10.1186/1477-7525-8-100

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes        ISSN: 1477-7525            Impact factor:   3.186


  56 in total

1.  Assessing health-related quality of life: is it important when evaluation the effectiveness of cardiac rehabilitation?

Authors:  N Oldridge
Journal:  J Cardiopulm Rehabil       Date:  2003 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.081

Review 2.  Trait anger, anger expression, and ambulatory blood pressure: a meta-analytic review.

Authors:  Jennifer L Schum; Randall S Jorgensen; Paul Verhaeghen; Marie Sauro; Ryan Thibodeau
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2003-10

3.  Independent and mediated contributions of personality, coping, social support, and depressive symptoms to physical functioning outcome among patients in cardiac rehabilitation.

Authors:  Biing-Jiun Shen; Charles P McCreary; Hector F Myers
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2004-02

4.  Change in quality of life in the year following cardiac rehabilitation.

Authors:  J Müller-Nordhorn; M Kulig; S Binting; H Völler; H Gohlke; K Linde; S N Willich
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.147

5.  Social inequality, ethnicity and cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  R S Cooper
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 7.196

Review 6.  Improving patients' communication with doctors: a systematic review of intervention studies.

Authors:  Jane Harrington; Lorraine M Noble; Stanton P Newman
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2004-01

7.  A factorial randomised controlled trial of decision analysis and an information video plus leaflet for newly diagnosed hypertensive patients.

Authors:  Alan A Montgomery; Tom Fahey; Tim J Peters
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 5.386

8.  Health-related quality of life in patients with coronary artery disease treated for angina: validity and reliability of German translations of two specific questionnaires.

Authors:  S Höfer; W Benzer; G Schüssler; N von Steinbüchel; N B Oldridge
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.147

9.  Depression and other psychological risks following myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Nancy Frasure-Smith; François Lespérance
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  2003-06

10.  Association of perceived physician communication style with patient satisfaction, distress, cancer-related self-efficacy, and perceived control over the disease.

Authors:  R Zachariae; C G Pedersen; A B Jensen; E Ehrnrooth; P B Rossen; H von der Maase
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2003-03-10       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  9 in total

1.  [Communication preferences of patients with chronic back pain in medical rehabilitation].

Authors:  E Schmidt; L Gramm; E Farin
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 1.107

2.  Predictors of Changes in Health-Related Quality of Life 6 and 12 months After a Bariatric Procedure.

Authors:  Carolin Peterhänsel; Michaela Nagl; Birgit Wagner; Arne Dietrich; Anette Kersting
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 4.129

3.  HIV/AIDS patients' medical and psychosocial needs in the era of HAART: a cross-sectional study among HIV/AIDS patients receiving HAART in Yunnan, China.

Authors:  Yi Wen; Yun Shi; Chengqin Jiang; Roger Detels; Di Wu
Journal:  AIDS Care       Date:  2012-10-15

4.  Provider and Consumer Behaviors and their Interaction for Measuring Person-Centered Care.

Authors:  Samantha M Hack; Anjana Muralidharan; Clayton H Brown; Alicia A Lucksted; Jennifer Patterson
Journal:  Int J Pers Cent Med       Date:  2017

5.  Development of an instrument evaluating the impact of surgeon-patient relationship in patients on sick leave.

Authors:  Thierry Dubert; Cedric Girault; Alexandre Kilink; Marc Rozenblat; Yves Lebellec; Anne-Lise Vataire; Myriam Vilasco; Gregory Katz
Journal:  J Mark Access Health Policy       Date:  2017-08-11

6.  Doctor-patient relationship: Evidence from Bangladesh.

Authors:  Syed Abdul Hamid; Afroza Begum; Md Ragaul Azim; Md Sirajul Islam
Journal:  Health Sci Rep       Date:  2021-10-01

7.  A qualitative study to identify reasons for discharges against medical advice in the cardiovascular setting.

Authors:  Eberechukwu Onukwugha; Elijah Saunders; C Daniel Mullins; Françoise G Pradel; Marni Zuckerman; F Ellen Loh; Matthew R Weir
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2012-07-30       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  Translation and psychometric testing of the Farsi version of the Seattle angina questionnaire.

Authors:  Zahra Taheri-Kharameh; Majideh Heravi-Karimooi; Nahid Rejeh; Ebrahim Hajizadeh; Mojtaba Vaismoradi; Sherrill Snelgrove; Ali Montazeri
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2017-12-02       Impact factor: 3.186

9.  Patient Involvement in Care and Breast Cancer Patients’ Quality of Life- a Structural Equation Modeling (SEM)zzm321990Approach

Authors:  Hajar Dehghan; Ali Keshtkaran; Niloofar Ahmadloo; Zahra Bagheri; Nahid Hatam
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2018-09-26
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.