Literature DB >> 12639066

Health-related quality of life in patients with coronary artery disease treated for angina: validity and reliability of German translations of two specific questionnaires.

S Höfer1, W Benzer, G Schüssler, N von Steinbüchel, N B Oldridge.   

Abstract

The German versions of two patient-perceived heart disease specific health-related quality of life (HRQL) questionnaires, the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) and the MacNew Heart Disease questionnaire, were examined for their psychometric properties in patients with angiographically documented coronary artery disease and angina who were treated either medically or invasively and followed up for 1 year. Both HRQL questionnaires and the modified Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) angina-associated disability scale were completed by 158 patients at baseline and 12 months later when they also completed a generic health status questionnaire, the SF-36. Both specific HRQL questionnaires were acceptable to patients. Three of the four MacNew scales, but none of the SAQ scales, discriminated between patients by baseline CCS disability levels I and IV. Internal consistency ranged from 0.75 to 0.94 for the SAQ and from 0.86 to 0.97 for the MacNew scales. Test-retest reliability over a 4-week period of time ranged from 0.45 to 0.81 for the SAQ scales and 0.61 to 0.68 for the MacNew scales. Over 12 months, HRQL improved (p < 0.001) on three of the five SAQ and on all four of the MacNew scales with the responsiveness statistic ranging from 0.59 to 1.55 for the SAQ and 0.86 to 1.12 for the MacNew. The 12 month scores on all SAQ and MacNew scales were significantly higher in patients who improved than those who deteriorated on the SF-36 reported health transition question. We conclude that the SAQ and the MacNew are both valid, reliable, and responsive in German, that the MacNew discriminates better between angina grades at baseline, that HRQL improves over 12 months with both measures, that the SAQ angina frequency and disease perception scales have the largest effect sizes, and that the 12-month change in HRQL with both instruments was associated with change in SF-36 reported health transition status.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12639066     DOI: 10.1023/a:1022272620947

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Life Res        ISSN: 0962-9343            Impact factor:   4.147


  44 in total

Review 1.  Methods for assessing responsiveness: a critical review and recommendations.

Authors:  J A Husted; R J Cook; V T Farewell; D D Gladman
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 6.437

2.  Changes in health after elective percutaneous coronary revascularization. A comparison of generic and specific measures.

Authors:  H M Krumholz; C A McHorney; L Clark; M Levesque; D S Baim; L Goldman
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 2.983

3.  An improved questionnaire for assessing quality of life after acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  L Valenti; L Lim; R F Heller; J Knapp
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 4.147

4.  Letter: Grading of angina pectoris.

Authors:  L Campeau
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1976-09       Impact factor: 29.690

5.  Reproducibility and responsiveness of health status measures. Statistics and strategies for evaluation.

Authors:  R A Deyo; P Diehr; D L Patrick
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  1991-08

6.  Quality of life after coronary angioplasty or continued medical treatment for angina: three-year follow-up in the RITA-2 trial. Randomized Intervention Treatment of Angina.

Authors:  S J Pocock; R A Henderson; T Clayton; G H Lyman; D A Chamberlain
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2000-03-15       Impact factor: 24.094

7.  Predictors of quality of life after hospital admission for heart attack or angina.

Authors:  R F Heller; L Lim; L Valenti; J Knapp
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  1997-04-18       Impact factor: 4.164

8.  Quality of life in patients with ischaemic heart disease: a prospective controlled study.

Authors:  L Westin; R Carlsson; B Israelsson; R Willenheimer; C Cline; T F McNeil
Journal:  J Intern Med       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 8.989

Review 9.  Review of available instruments and methods for assessing quality of life in anti-anginal trials.

Authors:  B D Bliven; C P Green; J A Spertus
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 3.923

10.  Quality of life after myocardial infarction.

Authors:  T K Hillers; G H Guyatt; N Oldridge; J Crowe; A Willan; L Griffith; D Feeny
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 6.437

View more
  27 in total

1.  Test-retest reliability of HeartQoL and its comparability to the MacNew heart disease health-related quality of life questionnaire.

Authors:  Wan Ling Lee; Karuthan Chinna; Awang Bulgiba; Khatijah Lim Abdullah; Imran Zainal Abidin; Stefan Höfer
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2015-08-09       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Quality of life after myocardial infarction: translation and validation of the MacNew Questionnaire for a Dutch population.

Authors:  Veronique De Gucht; Therese Van Elderen; Leo van der Kamp; Neil Oldridge
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  Evaluative and discriminative properties of the Portuguese MacNew Heart Disease Health-related Quality of Life Questionnaire.

Authors:  A Leal; C Paiva; S Höfer; J Amado; L Gomes; N Oldridge
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 4.147

4.  The Italian MacNew heart disease health-related quality of life questionnaire: a validation study.

Authors:  Francesco Fattirolli; Niccolò Marchionni; Stefan Höfer; Pantaleo Giannuzzi; Elisabetta Angelino; Paolo Fioretti; Daniela Miani; Neil Oldridge
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2015-02-10       Impact factor: 3.397

5.  Quality of life after PCI vs CABG among patients with diabetes and multivessel coronary artery disease: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Mouin S Abdallah; Kaijun Wang; Elizabeth A Magnuson; John A Spertus; Michael E Farkouh; Valentin Fuster; David J Cohen
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2013-10-16       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Development and validation of the nasopharyngeal cancer scale among the system of quality of life instruments for cancer patients (QLICP-NA V2.0): combined classical test theory and generalizability theory.

Authors:  Jiayuan Wu; Liren Hu; Gaohua Zhang; Qilian Liang; Qiong Meng; Chonghua Wan
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2016-02-29       Impact factor: 4.147

7.  Health-related quality of life predicts unplanned rehospitalization following coronary revascularization.

Authors:  W Benzer; A Philippi; S Hoefer; O Friedrich; N Oldridge
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2015-09-22       Impact factor: 1.443

8.  Validation of the EuroQol questionnaire in cardiac rehabilitation.

Authors:  B Schweikert; H Hahmann; R Leidl
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2005-03-29       Impact factor: 5.994

9.  Clinical predictors of health-related quality of life after pacemaker implantation.

Authors:  Werner Benzer; Neil Oldridge; Michael Anelli Monti; Thomas Berger; Florian Hintringer; Stefan Höfer
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 1.704

10.  Cardiac rehabilitation in Austria: short term quality of life improvements in patients with heart disease.

Authors:  Stefan Höfer; Werner Kullich; Ursula Graninger; Dieter Brandt; Alfred Gassner; Martin Klicpera; Herbert Laimer; Christiane Marko; Helmut Schwann; Rudolf Müller
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 1.704

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.