Literature DB >> 20840671

Homogeneous EGFR amplification defines a subset of aggressive Barrett's adenocarcinomas with poor prognosis.

Andreas H Marx1, Margarete Zielinski, Charlotte-Marie Kowitz, Ana-Maria Dancau, Sabrina Thieltges, Ronald Simon, Matthias Choschzick, Emre Yekebas, Jussuf T Kaifi, Martina Mirlacher, Djordje Atanackovic, Tim H Brümmendorf, Walter Fiedler, Carsten Bokemeyer, Jakob R Izbicki, Guido Sauter.   

Abstract

AIMS: The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is a tyrosine kinase (TK) involved in the tumour progression of many cancer types and may serve as an important therapeutic target (erlotinib, cetuximab). Heterogeneity of EGFR amplification and expression could represent a major drawback for anti-EGFR therapy. The aim of this study was performed to determine the potential impact of tumour heterogeneity on anti-EGFR therapy in Barrett's adenocarcinoma (BAC). METHODS AND
RESULTS: Tissue microarray (TMA) sections of 112 BAC and 45 lymph node metastases were analysed for EGFR amplification and expression using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and immunohistochemistry (IHC). A subset of 20 samples was also sequenced for EGFR exons 18-21 and Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homologue (KRAS) exons 2-3 mutations. EGFR amplification was seen in seven (6.25%) of 112 interpretable BAC and typically high-level with more than 10-20 EGFR copies per tumour cell (EGFR/centromere 7 ratio >3). EGFR amplification was associated with high pT, pN and poor prognosis (P = 0.0004). Identical EGFR amplification status was found in 29 primary tumours and 29 matched lymph node metastases. Moreover, FISH analysis of three to 16 large sections from all amplified BAC and corresponding lymph node metastases did not reveal any heterogeneity of EGFR amplification. No EGFR mutation but one KRAS mutation was found.
CONCLUSION: The high level and homogeneity of EGFR amplification in primary tumours and metastases suggests the potential therapeutic utility of anti-EGFR drugs in BAC.
© 2010 Blackwell Publishing Limited.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20840671     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2559.2010.03643.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Histopathology        ISSN: 0309-0167            Impact factor:   5.087


  13 in total

Review 1.  [Update on Barrett esophagus and Barrett carcinoma].

Authors:  M Werner; S Laßmann
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 1.011

2.  Role of epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors in the treatment of esophageal carcinoma and the suggested mechanisms of action.

Authors:  Yaping Xu; Liming Sheng; Weimin Mao
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2012-10-24       Impact factor: 2.967

3.  MUC2 expression is an adverse prognostic factor in superficial gastroesophageal adenocarcinomas.

Authors:  Jon M Davison; Shane T Ellis; Tyler J Foxwell; James D Luketich; Michael K Gibson; Shih-Fan Kuan; Katie S Nason
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  2013-10-30       Impact factor: 3.466

4.  Three-dimensional mRNA measurements reveal minimal regional heterogeneity in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Wusheng Yan; Joanna Shih; Jaime Rodriguez-Canales; Michael A Tangrea; Audrey Player; Lixia Diao; Nan Hu; Alisa M Goldstein; Jing Wang; Philip R Taylor; Scott M Lippman; Ignacio I Wistuba; Michael R Emmert-Buck; Heidi S Erickson
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2012-12-03       Impact factor: 4.307

5.  A synonymous EGFR polymorphism predicting responsiveness to anti-EGFR therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer patients.

Authors:  Serena Bonin; Marisa Donada; Gianni Bussolati; Ermanno Nardon; Laura Annaratone; Martin Pichler; Anna Maria Chiaravalli; Carlo Capella; Gerald Hoefler; Giorgio Stanta
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2015-12-15

6.  Esophageal carcinoma cell line with high EGFR polysomy is responsive to gefitinib.

Authors:  Astrid Drenckhan; Tobias Grob; Anna Dupree; Thorsten Dohrmann; Oliver Mann; Jakob R Izbicki; Stephanie J Gros
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2014-07-29       Impact factor: 3.445

7.  Subcellular localization of EGFR in esophageal carcinoma cell lines.

Authors:  Lucas Spohn; Christiane Fichter; Martin Werner; Silke Lassmann
Journal:  J Cell Commun Signal       Date:  2015-11-18       Impact factor: 5.782

8.  The degree of segmental aneuploidy measured by total copy number abnormalities predicts survival and recurrence in superficial gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Jon M Davison; Melissa Yee; J Michael Krill-Burger; Maureen A Lyons-Weiler; Lori A Kelly; Christin M Sciulli; Katie S Nason; James D Luketich; George K Michalopoulos; William A LaFramboise
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-16       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Prognostic significance of epidermal growth factor receptor in locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma for patients receiving chemoradiotherapy.

Authors:  Zhenhua Gao; Xue Meng; Dianbin Mu; Xindong Sun; Jinming Yu
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2014-02-13       Impact factor: 2.967

10.  High-incidence of PTEN mutations in Chinese patients with primary small cell carcinoma of the esophagus.

Authors:  Zhimin Zhang; Hualiang Xiao; Fei Xie; Hui Zhang; Chuan Chen; He Xiao; Zhenzhou Yang; Dong Wang; Zengpeng Li; Ge Wang
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2014-01-14       Impact factor: 4.430

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.