Sarah Ross1, Yoon K Loke. 1. Division of Medical and Dental Education, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen and School of Medicine, Health Policy and Practice, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK. s.ross@abdn.ac.uk
Abstract
AIMS: The question of whether new medical graduates are adequately prepared for the challenge of prescribing has been raised. Although broad outcomes for prescribing competency have been agreed, clarity is needed on the detailed outcomes expected of new graduates. This study aimed to create a consensus on the required competencies for new graduates in the area of prescribing. METHODS: We used a modified Delphi approach based on the findings of a systematic review of educational interventions for improved prescribing. Panellists were asked to rank the importance of a list of 53 possible learning outcomes and to add any additional outcomes felt to be missing. RESULTS: Of the 48 experts who were invited to participate, 28 agreed (58%). Forty-five learning outcomes were included from the original list of 53. A further nine outcomes were suggested by panellists, of which five were included. The wording of three outcomes was changed in line with suggestions from the panellists. Many of the agreed outcomes relate to improving patient safety through medication review, checking appropriateness of the drug for the patient, recognizing the prescriber's limitations and seeking advice when needed. Enhanced communication with the patient and healthcare team, better documentation in the notes and discharge letters were key areas featured in this Delphi exercise. DISCUSSION: This study has identified 50 learning outcomes for teaching prescribing. These build on the existing British Pharmacological Society document by focusing specifically on prescribing, with greater emphasis on avoiding medication errors and better communication.
AIMS: The question of whether new medical graduates are adequately prepared for the challenge of prescribing has been raised. Although broad outcomes for prescribing competency have been agreed, clarity is needed on the detailed outcomes expected of new graduates. This study aimed to create a consensus on the required competencies for new graduates in the area of prescribing. METHODS: We used a modified Delphi approach based on the findings of a systematic review of educational interventions for improved prescribing. Panellists were asked to rank the importance of a list of 53 possible learning outcomes and to add any additional outcomes felt to be missing. RESULTS: Of the 48 experts who were invited to participate, 28 agreed (58%). Forty-five learning outcomes were included from the original list of 53. A further nine outcomes were suggested by panellists, of which five were included. The wording of three outcomes was changed in line with suggestions from the panellists. Many of the agreed outcomes relate to improving patient safety through medication review, checking appropriateness of the drug for the patient, recognizing the prescriber's limitations and seeking advice when needed. Enhanced communication with the patient and healthcare team, better documentation in the notes and discharge letters were key areas featured in this Delphi exercise. DISCUSSION: This study has identified 50 learning outcomes for teaching prescribing. These build on the existing British Pharmacological Society document by focusing specifically on prescribing, with greater emphasis on avoiding medication errors and better communication.
Authors: David J Brinkman; Jelle Tichelaar; Sanne Graaf; René H J Otten; Milan C Richir; Michiel A van Agtmael Journal: Br J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2018-01-25 Impact factor: 4.335
Authors: Lynda M Cardiff; Elaine Pm Lum; Charles Mitchell; Lisa M Nissen; Marea P Patounas; Liza-Jane McBride Journal: J Multidiscip Healthc Date: 2018-10-30
Authors: David J Brinkman; Jelle Tichelaar; Lidwine B Mokkink; Thierry Christiaens; Robert Likic; Romaldas Maciulaitis; Joao Costa; Emilio J Sanz; Simon R Maxwell; Milan C Richir; Michiel A van Agtmael Journal: Clin Pharmacol Ther Date: 2018-01-30 Impact factor: 6.875
Authors: Erik Donker; David Brinkman; Milan Richir; Paraskevi Papaioannidou; Robert Likic; Emilio J Sanz; Thierry Christiaens; João Costa; Fabrizio De Ponti; Milo Gatti; Ylva Böttiger; Cornelis Kramers; Sarah Garner; Rahul Pandit; Michiel van Agtmael; Jelle Tichelaar Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2021-05-04 Impact factor: 2.692