Caroline Williams1. 1. Faculty of Life and Health Sciences, University of Ulster, Newtownabbey, Co. Antrim, UK. caroline.caesara@btconnect.com
Abstract
AIM: To critically review the work-based learning literature and explore the implications of the findings for the development of work-based learning programmes. BACKGROUND: With NHS budgets under increasing pressure, and challenges to the impact of classroom-based learning on patient outcomes, work-based learning is likely to come under increased scrutiny as a potential solution. Evidence from higher education institutions suggests that work-based learning can improve practice, but in many cases it is perceived as little more than on-the-job training to perform tasks. EVALUATION: The CINAHL database was searched using the keywords work-based learning, work-place learning and practice-based learning. Those articles that had a focus on post-registration nursing were selected and critically reviewed. KEY ISSUES: Using the review of the literature, three key issues were explored. Work-based learning has the potential to change practice. Learning how to learn and critical reflection are key features. For effective work-based learning nurses need to take control of their own learning, receive support to critically reflect on their practice and be empowered to make changes to that practice. CONCLUSIONS: A critical review of the literature has identified essential considerations for the implementation of work-based learning. A change in culture from classroom to work-based learning requires careful planning and consideration of learning cultures. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING MANAGEMENT: To enable effective work-based learning, nurse managers need to develop a learning culture in their workplace. They should ensure that skilled facilitation is provided to support staff with critical reflection and effecting changes in practice. CONTRIBUTION TO NEW KNOWLEDGE: This paper has identified three key issues that need to be considered in the development of work-based learning programmes.
AIM: To critically review the work-based learning literature and explore the implications of the findings for the development of work-based learning programmes. BACKGROUND: With NHS budgets under increasing pressure, and challenges to the impact of classroom-based learning on patient outcomes, work-based learning is likely to come under increased scrutiny as a potential solution. Evidence from higher education institutions suggests that work-based learning can improve practice, but in many cases it is perceived as little more than on-the-job training to perform tasks. EVALUATION: The CINAHL database was searched using the keywords work-based learning, work-place learning and practice-based learning. Those articles that had a focus on post-registration nursing were selected and critically reviewed. KEY ISSUES: Using the review of the literature, three key issues were explored. Work-based learning has the potential to change practice. Learning how to learn and critical reflection are key features. For effective work-based learning nurses need to take control of their own learning, receive support to critically reflect on their practice and be empowered to make changes to that practice. CONCLUSIONS: A critical review of the literature has identified essential considerations for the implementation of work-based learning. A change in culture from classroom to work-based learning requires careful planning and consideration of learning cultures. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING MANAGEMENT: To enable effective work-based learning, nurse managers need to develop a learning culture in their workplace. They should ensure that skilled facilitation is provided to support staff with critical reflection and effecting changes in practice. CONTRIBUTION TO NEW KNOWLEDGE: This paper has identified three key issues that need to be considered in the development of work-based learning programmes.
Authors: Peter Pype; Wim Peersman; Johan Wens; Ann Stes; Bart Van den Eynden; Myriam Deveugele Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2014-11-07 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Ekechi Okereke; Jamilu Tukur; Amina Aminu; Jean Butera; Bello Mohammed; Mustapha Tanko; Ibrahim Yisa; Benson Obonyo; Mike Egboh Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2015-02-15 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Bertine M J Flokstra-de Blok; Thecla M Brakel; Marian Wubs; Ben Skidmore; Janwillem W H Kocks; Joanne N G Oude Elberink; Marie-Louise A Schuttelaar; Jantina L van der Velde; Thys van der Molen; Anthony E J Dubois Journal: Clin Transl Allergy Date: 2018-05-29 Impact factor: 5.871