| Literature DB >> 2084024 |
B B Gerstman1, J M Piper, J P Freiman, D K Tomita, D L Kennedy, W J Ferguson, R C Bennett.
Abstract
To assess possible differences in the incidence of venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism associated with oral contraceptives of varying hormonal potencies, the authors conducted a retrospective cohort study in the 15-44 year old Michigan Medicaid population. Cohorts were defined by the progestin- and oestrogen-potencies of oral contraceptives in use at the time of follow-up as classified by an oral contraceptive potency scheme. Using the low-oestrogen-/low-progestin-potency formulations for reference (rate ratio = 1), adjusted rate ratios of 0.8 (95% CI: 0.5 to 1.3, P = 0.41) and 0.6 (95% CI 0.4 to 1.2, P = 0.13) were observed for intermediate-progestin-potency and high-progestin-potency formulations, respectively. Adjusted rate ratios of 1.4 (95% CI: 0.8 to 2.3, P = 0.21) and 2.6 (95% CI: 1.2 to 5.5, P = 0.01) were observed for intermediate- and high-oestrogen-potency formulations. These data suggest a dose-response relationship between oral contraceptive oestrogen potency and venous thromboembolism, whereas no such evidence for a dose-response relationship between oral contraceptive progestin potency and venous thrombo-embolism was found.Entities:
Keywords: Adult; Age Factors; Aged; Americas; Biology; Cohort Analysis; Contraception; Contraceptive Methods; Demographic Factors; Developed Countries; Diseases; Drug Interactions; Drugs; Economic Factors; Embolism; Endocrine System; Estrogens--analysis; Family Planning; Financial Activities; Financing, Government; Hormones; Incidence; Measurement; Medical Assistance, Title 19; Michigan; North America; Northern America; Oral Contraceptives; Physiology; Population; Population Characteristics; Progestational Hormones; Progesterone--analysis; Public Assistance; Research Methodology; Retrospective Studies; Risk Factors; Studies; Thromboembolism; Treatment; United States; Vascular Diseases
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 1990 PMID: 2084024 DOI: 10.1093/ije/19.4.931
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Epidemiol ISSN: 0300-5771 Impact factor: 7.196